The southern United States is often the victim of its own history, where racial biases and prejudices restricted the civil rights and liberties of African Americans. Following the civil war during the reconstruction period, Jim Crow laws enforced racial segregation in all public facilities in what once was the Confederate States of America. These laws shaped the United States for years to come and according to Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow have created a modern day social caste system, one where African Americans are restrained in a limited position in the social hierarchy. Racial caste is alive and well in the United States. In a generation that elected an African American as their president, supports Black History month and sees …show more content…
an abundance of black leaders in the public spotlight, mass incarceration is an all too real omen to the notion that racial equality is still on the horizon. In 1986, the U.S. Congress passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, which amongst other things, created a 100 to 1 sentencing disparity for crack vs. powder cocaine possession, which some people consider to be a racist law that discriminates against minorities. Alexander points to the United States having the world’s highest incarceration rate, booming prison populations contributed to drug convictions. The bias that African Americans receive by law enforcement polices and tactics all lead to a double standard where African American youth face time behind bars and receive a second-class status that follows them everywhere in life. While the book states that different races consume illegal drugs at similar rates, the harsh reality remains where in some states black men have been sent to prison on drug charges at rates twenty to fifty times those of white men. This number is a serious reminder that police officers reinforce racial stereotypes of what is perceived to be a criminal and conduct their operations in a manner that doesn’t serve proper justice. The court system essentially gives little to no effort to any impoverished African American youth, and many accept plea bargains or lesser sentences rather than facing a overcrowded judicial system that paints a picture of life in jail before the defendant is able to take the stand.
The War on Drugs has not deterred the use or sale of narcotics in this country and has instead only singled out people, defined by their race. Alexander compares the mass incarceration of minorities under harsh treatment by police enforcement and court systems as the new form of the south’s Jim Crow laws. The epidemic of crack cocaine in inner cities that forced Reagan’s hand to begin the Drug War only fueled mass imprisonment of African-Americans when in contradiction, whites and any other racial group for the matter, also engage in such criminal activity. Alexander puts estimates that whites may actually use drugs more frequently in proportion to their population. But the enforcement selectively hurts minorities more frequently than it hurts …show more content…
whites. Ultimately, there are few rules that constrain police in the War on Drugs. Consequently, it is very easy for them to make arrests and detainments or to find drugs if they are present. Many court cases have been brought and usually been found to have expanded the power of the government in drug searches repeatedly, to the point where one wonders if it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Alexander documents this phenomenon and court cases that have made "racially discriminatory enforcement" drug policies into an impossible and unworkable defense for any criminal. The division often can be seen to fall on poverty lines, too. No doubt that this is significant. Alexander’s argument is that this new system of racial caste, called mass incarceration, is a contributing element in the cycle of poverty enforced upon minorities, and not merely an effect of the cycle. Alexander cites that few people in drug crimes go to trial. They usually plead out. So, even in cases of innocence, you will be found plead guilty, because you don't have the resources not to. Once in, the odds of getting out and going back are astronomical. Under the current laws, the conditions are not conducive to people overcoming addiction or being rehabilitated. Then, of course, once out, they cannot get a job or welfare because of felony convictions. The social stigma of being a convicted felon – even for minor offenses of marijuana possession, leave a long lasting burden on one’s life when seeking employment or a stable social life and many are often forced to homelessness or even suicide. Alexander highlights the extraordinary number of African American men, “locked away in cages.” In a chapter titled How It Works, Alexander demonstrates three stages that define the entrapment towards such minorities.
The first stage, known as the roundup, sweeps vast numbers into the criminal justice system by police who are rewarded in cash through drug forfeiture laws and federal grant programs for rounding up as many people as possible. Uninhibited by constitutional rules of procedure, police can stop, interrogate and search anyone, granting racial biases free rein. The second stage, involves the conviction of a defendant who is denied meaningful representation and pressured to plead guilty while prosecutors are able to seek extra charges with any decision immune from review of any racial bias. Some advocates have dubbed the final stage as the period of invisible punishment. This term is meant to describe the unique set of criminal sanctions that are imposed on individuals after they step outside the prison gates, a form of punishment that largely operates outside of public view and takes effect outside the traditional sentencing framework. These laws operate collectively to ensure that the vast majority of convicted offenders will never integrate. They will be discriminated against, legally, for the rest of their lives and denied employment, housing, education, and public benefits. Many will eventually return to prison and then be released again, caught in a closed
circuit of perpetual imprisonment with no ability to break the barriers constraining their lives. Alexander focuses on mass incarceration, which shares a great deal of underlying characteristics, namely a systematized control of minorities that keeps them oppressed as a system of racial caste in a fashion similar to the oppressive nature of the Jim Crow laws of the past. The War on Drugs merely operates as a scapegoat and a vessel for law enforcement to enact the racial bias and bigotry that once fueled this nation through many civil rights movements.
C. Vann Woodward’s most famous work, The Strange Career of Jim Crow, was written in 1955. It chronicles the birth, formation, and end of Jim Crow laws in the Southern states. Often, the Jim Crow laws are portrayed as having been instituted directly after the Civil War’s end, and having been solely a Southern brainchild. However, as Woodward, a native of Arkansas points out, the segregationist Jim Crow laws and policies were not fully a part of the culture until almost 1900. Because of the years of lag between the Civil War/Reconstruction eras and the integration and popularity of the Jim Crow laws, Woodward advances that these policies were not a normal reaction to the loss of the war by Southern whites, but a result of other impetuses central to the time of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
The book, the Strange Career of Jim Crow is a wonderful piece of history. C. Vann Woodard crafts a book that explains the history of Jim Crow and segregation in simple terms. It is a book that presents more than just the facts and figures, it presents a clear and a very accurate portrayal of the rise and fall of Jim Crow and segregation. The book has become one of the most influential of its time earning the praise of great figures in Twentieth Century American History. It is a book that holds up to its weighty praise of being “the historical Bible of the civil rights movement.” The book is present in a light that is free from petty bias and that is shaped by a clear point of view that considers all facts equally. It is a book that will remain one of the best explanations of this time period.
The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness is a book by Michelle Alexander, a civil rights litigator and legal scholar. The book discusses race-related issues specific to African-American males and mass incarceration in the United States. Michelle Alexander (2010) argues that despite the old Jim Crow is death, does not necessarily means the end of racial caste (p.21). In her book “The New Jim Crow”, Alexander describes a set of practices and social discourses that serve to maintain African American people controlled by institutions. In this book her analyses is centered in examining the mass incarceration phenomenon in recent years. Comparing Jim Crow with mass incarceration she points out that mass incarceration is a network of laws, policies, customs and institutions that works together –almost invisible– to ensure the subordinate status of a group defined by race, African American (p. 178 -190).
...ty and their survival as a group in society because of restraint from the federal government in the ability to litigate their plight in Court. The Author transitions the past and present signatures of Jim Crow and the New Jim Crow with the suggestion that the New Jim Crow, by mass incarceration and racism as a whole, is marginalizes and relegates Blacks to residential, educational and constitutionally endowed service to Country.
“The New Jim Crow” is an article by Michelle Alexander, published by the Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law. Michelle is a professor at the Ohio State Moritz college of criminal law as well as a civil rights advocate. Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law is part of the world’s top education system, is accredited by the American Bar Association, and is a long-time member of the American Law association. The goal of “The New Jim Crow” is to inform the public about the issues of race in our country, especially our legal system. The article is written in plain English, so the common person can fully understand it, but it also remains very professional. Throughout the article, Alexander provides factual information about racial issues in our country. She relates them back to the Jim Crow era and explains how the large social problem affects individual lives of people of color all over the country. By doing this, Alexander appeals to the reader’s ethos, logos, and pathos, forming a persuasive essay that shifts the understanding and opinions of all readers.
Since the election of President Barrack Obama in 2008, many people have started to believe that America is beyond racial inequalities - this is not the reality. Rather, we, as a society, chose to see only what we want to see. Discrimination is still rampant in our nation. Michelle Alexander explains that since the Jim Crow laws were abolished, new forms of racial caste systems have taken their place. Our society and criminal justice system claim to be colorblind, but this is not the actuality. Michelle Alexander explains:
The Strange Career of Jim Crow, by C. Van Woodward, traces the history of race relations in the United States from the mid and late nineteenth century through the twentieth century. In doing so Woodward brings to light significant aspects of Reconstruction that remain unknown to many today. He argues that the races were not as separate many people believe until the Jim Crow laws. To set up such an argument, Woodward first outlines the relationship between Southern and Northern whites, and African Americans during the nineteenth century. He then breaks down the details of the injustice brought about by the Jim Crow laws, and outlines the transformation in American society from discrimination to Civil Rights. Woodward’s argument is very persuasive because he uses specific evidence to support his opinions and to connect his ideas. Considering the time period in which the book and its editions were written, it should be praised for its insight into and analysis of the most important social issue in American history.
The War on Drugs is believed to help with many problems in today’s society such as realizing the rise of crime rates and the uprooting of violent offenders and drug kingpin. Michelle Alexander explains that the War on Drugs is a new way to control society much like how Jim Crow did after the Civil War. There are many misconceptions about the War on Drugs; commonly people believe that it’s helping society with getting rid of those who are dangerous to the general public. The War on Drugs is similar to Jim Crow by hiding the real intention behind Mass Incarceration of people of color. The War on Drugs is used to take away rights of those who get incarcerated. When they plead guilty, they will lose their right to vote and have to check application
Does the name Jim Crow ring a bell? Neither singer nor actor, but actually the name for the Separate but Equal (Jim Crow) Laws of the 1900s. Separate but Equal Laws stated that businesses and public places had to have separate, but equal, facilities for minorities and Caucasian people. Unfortunately, they usually had different levels of maintenance or quality. Lasting hatred from the civil war, and anger towards minorities because they took jobs in the north probably set the foundation for these laws, but it has become difficult to prove. In this essay, I will explain how the Separate but Equal Laws of twentieth century America crippled minorities of that time period forever.
This supports the conservative’s claim that the war on drugs is not making any progress to stop the supply of drugs coming into America. Conservative writer for the magazine National Review, William Buckley, shows his outrage towards the Council on Crime in America for their lack of motivation to change the drug policies that are ineffective. Buckley asks, “If 1.35 million drug users were arrested in 1994, how many drug users were not arrested? The Council informs us that there are more than 4 million casual users of cocaine” (70). Buckley goes on to discuss in the article, “Misfire on Drug Policy,” how the laws set up by the Council were meant to decrease the number of drug users, not increase the number of violators.
The prospect of a racially discriminatory process violates the ideals of equal treatment under the law under which the system is premised (Kansal, 2005). Law enforcement, as the frontline of the criminal justice system, has a great deal to do with who ends up being incarcerated. Law enforcement personnel are the initiating beings who start the path to incarceration for individuals they come in contact with. Their decision in terms of making a stop, making a report, making an arrest and so on determines if and how that individual will enter the criminal justice system. One discriminating practice used by police officers is racial profiling.
“Jim Crow was more than a series of rigid anti-black laws. It was a way of life.” (“What was Jim Crow?”). The laws created a divided America and made the United States a cruel place for over 70 years. The Jim Crow Laws caused segregation in the education system, social segregation, and limited job opportunities for African Americans.
Michelle Alexander asserts that mass incarceration in contemporary American society is the result of targeting African Americans in the “War on Drugs” and serves to maintain a racial caste system similar to the system that existed during pre-Civil War slavery and has been propelled by what Michael Cohen calls “Jim Crow political logic” of Southern
One of the most prevalent misconceptions, Benson and Rasmussen, contend is the notion that a large percentage of drug users commit nondrug crimes, what might be called the “drugs-cause-crime” assumption implicit in the government’s drug-war strategy. If true, then an effective crackdown on ...
Massive protests against racial segregation and discrimination broke out in the southern United States that came to national attention during the middle of the 1950’s. This movement started in centuries-long attempts by African slaves to resist slavery. After the Civil War American slaves were given basic civil rights. However, even though these rights were guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment they were not federally enforced. The struggle these African-Americans faced to have their rights ...