Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Text messaging – how is it affecting literacy
What is the impact of texting on our culture and society
The advantages of texting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Text messaging – how is it affecting literacy
The New Age English Language As you walk around just take the second to notice that almost everyone you passed is quickly twiddling their thumbs across their phone screen. Ding. Someone’s iPhone just received a new text, two-seconds later, Swoosh. Did you figure out what the New Age English Language is yet? Yes, you are correct, texting. Since the first text message was set on December 3, 1992, our english language has been growing and evolving and it not stopping yet. Critics will claim that texting is destroy our english language as a whole. These critics do not understand that texting has formed from our modern day english. When thinking of texting, many fail to see that texting has become one of the newest form of the english language. In order to have a successful educational experience, one must be able to incorporate the benefits of texting which include having a strong understanding of grammar …show more content…
“texting… used to communicate ideas in English accurately and with ease and efficiency through a specific medium and for almost exclusive audience.” Texting had become a way to expressive in the most fastest way. A way to deliver important information to an audience without much problem. The use of text messaging becomes beneficial in an educational setting because if there was a group message between a class and it professor. This group chat will set up a communication between the two in a much more efficient way. Also when using text messaging, the language used can be more simple terms to get the message across easier. Text messaging can be as simple as “Wed. class moved M2-23” This would tell the recipient that the class on Wednesday will be moved and held in a different room, room M2-23. It was simply understood by the text in quotes that the class was moving. In addition, that group chat could even be a small summary of the lesson that day and key points to
Text messaging has become a norm in our generation, as technology rapidly advances and gives way to more efficient forms of communication in a fast-paced world; and many are skeptical about the influence this new form of interaction is having on our society, especially with our younger generation. David Crystal, a professor at the University of Wales, writes “2b or Not 2b?” in support of text messaging. He insists, despite those who underestimate or negate the beneficial influence text messaging has on language proficiency, that “there is increasing evidence that [texting] helps rather than hinders literacy” and that the fairly recent form of communication has actually been around for a while and “is merely the latest manifestation of the human ability to be linguistically creative and to adopt language to suit the demands of diverse settings. In contrast, Jeffery Kluger argues in “We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem with Text Messaging” that text messaging is rapidly becoming a substitute for more genuine forms of communication and is resulting in difficulty among young peoples of our generation to hold a face-to-face conversation, engage in significant nonverbal expression, and ultimately build effective relationships with family, friends and co-workers. Both writers’ present valid arguments, however, my personal experience with text messaging has led me to agree more with Crystal’s view on the matter. Text messaging is indeed having a positive effect on society by making frequent texters primarily aware of the need to be understood, as well as offering betterment of spelling and writing through practice, and reinventing and expanding on a bygone dimension of our language through the use of rebuses and abbreviations.
“Our generation doesn't ring the doorbell. They text or call to say they're outside,” this line is from one of the well-known social networks, Tweeter, which shows how the way of communication has change in this modern life. According to 2013 statistics by Business Insider, in United States alone, smartphone owners aged 18 to 24 send 2,022 texts per month on average — 67 texts on a daily basis — and receive another 1,831 texts (Cocotas). Nowadays, technology such as text messaging has practically replaced traditional face to face communication among the society primarily in young generations because texting allows messages to be sent fast and effortless. In order to quickly type what they are trying to say in text messaging, people are frequently using textspeak; the language created by using abbreviation rather than complete words. Based on this phenomenon, David Crystal, an honorary professor of linguistics at the University of Wales has published an article entitled ‘2b or not 2b?’ in the Guardian on July 5, 2008 comes out with the research and studies that state texting can actually improve the literacy of children and create creativity of writing. However, by observing more critically, texting do decrease a person’s ability to switch between textspeak and the normal rules of grammar and adversely affect formal writing and conversational skills.
He recognizes the shorting of the text appropriate language and the change in shorthanded words. Targeted audience can be different groups of people, including the: parents of teenagers during this rapid growth of technology, worried of their children losing the ability write in scholarly manner due to endless conversation through text message, the academic instructors and experts who stand against the texting as writing and anybody who has an access to texting on
These major changes show in the classroom. Texting affects students in the classroom, and the teachers.
You can say that overuse in texting is determination the way teens, students write formally in the classroom. Teens that spend most of their eyes on their phone has already created their own texting style. Now I am able to answer the question, how does texting affect teen literacy? Texting affects teen literacy because, text messaging does affect our grammar because, teens text like for example; “ttyl”, “gtg”, “wyd”. They find an easy way of texting rather than using the correct way. In order to get what they want done, we wanted to see and learn about the damage that texting can cause on teens and we did learn, we learned that it can affect our grammar, grades, and even your future in trying to get a job, your skills in so much more. I wanted to inform the teens about the damage that texting in short terms can do to you. Encourage them not to write in short term because, they are too
Texting is killing language,” Ted starts off the video by saying that “The idea is that texting spells the decline and fall of any kind of serious literacy, or at least writing ability, among young people in the United States and now the whole world today (Ted, 2013). Throughout the film discussion, what stuck out to me the most was how drastic language has changed via technology.
Drouin, M., & Davis, C. (2009). R U Txting? Is the Use of Text Speak Hurting Your Literacy?. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(1), 46-67. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?q=texting+spelling+grammar&id=EJ862013
Step onto any college campus and take a look around. You will find clumps of students standing around in circles, phones in hand, typing away. What is it they are doing? Texting. Ever since the first text message was sent in 1993, the use of text messaging as a means of communication has spread like wild fire, especially amongst the adolescent generation. And with this new form of communication a new language has appeared; text-speak, the shortening of common words into abbreviations and acronyms (Drouin 49). While texting and the text-speak language seem to have been welcomed by many, what affect is this new technology having on the way we communicate? Is it possible that texting is negatively affecting our ability to use formal written communication, or is this idea just a myth perpetuated by negative media attention? And what changes has texting brought to the way we communicate person-to person? Are these changes positive, negative, or perhaps a mixture of both?
Technology has evolved to become more advanced now compared to how it was in the past. In the past, one was not able to “text” one another because of the lack of technology, however, texting is now the way the younger generations verbally communicate with one another. There could still be more ways to improve technology in the near future. With many more improvements to come, there is still room for improvement of texting. Texting is not killing language, but instead is starting the development its own language.
Text messaging didn’t just develop overnight, it developed over time. Text messaging first started in the early 1900’s. The first text message ever sent said “Merry Christmas” on December 3, 1992. This message wound up being sent by Neil Papworth’s computer to Richard Jarvis’s mobile phone. It’s unusual to see a text message sent from a computer to a phone. Everyone is used to text messages being sent from mobile phone to mobile phone, but there was growth to get to that point. In 1993, Nokia took a big step by making the first mobile phone. This allowed customers to send text messages to each other. But this didn’t intrigue many people because in 1995, Americans sent on average 0.4 text message per month. With time, people began to text more. Within the next two years, text messaging became easier and easier. People started to realize that it’s more convenient than face-to-face conversations and you can get answers quicker. 2 years later, Nokia wanted to make text messaging easier for everyone. Nokia created the first mobile phone that featured a full keyboard on the Nokia 9000i Com...
“Texting in Class a Growing Problem.” TheKanson.com. 7 December 2010. Singel, Ryan. The.
Celts, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Danes, and Norman French had invaded the Great Britain years ago. Since then, the people there are mixed of genes, cultures, and spoken languages. As the result, despite the culture, the language also mongrelized. When someone imitate a foreign word, they are said to borrow it, and the action is called borrowing or loanwords. Thus, other than native English words, all the vocabulary are borrowed from foreign language or coined with its elements.
When someone knows a language, they can typically speak the language and understand the words, structure, and the meaning when someone is speaking the same language. Therefore, it would be in the best interest to make sure that everyone is on the same page—make sure that the sentence structure, every words’ meaning, everyone’s understanding of proper grammar is the same throughout the whole world. That’s precisely what the Spanish, French, and Italians did, creating centers for their languages in Madrid, Paris, and Rome, respectively, to make sure that no matter how far the language spread, the basic aspects of the language stayed consistent. English, on the other hand, has no center for the English language. English is the world’s most widespread
The English language has experienced several shifts and transformations ever since its earliest history in the medieval England to the current. English has been historically said to have evolved through three major stages that include Old English, Middle English and Modern English. Each of the three stages may be also sub-divided into early and late stages in order to give a comprehensive picture of the language’s history. English language, According to Algeo (2010), originated from the various dialects used by the Anglo-Frisian communities of the 5th to 7th century AD Britain. This form of English is classified as Old English and was popular among Germanic invaders who occupied the surrounding geographical areas at the time. Old English did,
The English language has changed extremely in the last centuries. It was not only reflected in the grammar and vocabulary but also in spelling and pronunciation. English passed two stages, namely Old English, Middle English, and now is in a continual state of change that can be still traced as Modern English.