Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of social media in our youth
The influence of social media in our youth
The influence of social media in our youth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The influence of social media in our youth
By banning books it will make create a very negative effect on many people. The main people that will be affected by this would be kids. Kids use books to get away from all the chaos of the world, bullying, a bad home life, or maybe even self hate. There are so many good books, but at the same time, there are some bad books out there that should not be read. But does that really mean that we should ban books? So many people think that by banning books, then people/kids won’t be able to read bad stuff. Well, this is technically not true. There are so many different “resources” out there in this time-period, that people can use, to read/see bad stuff. For intense, the internet is one of the biggest ones out there. Also if you think about it, …show more content…
books cost money. So if you ban books, then people will have more money because they don’t spend it on books right? Wrong… It doesn’t matter if books are banned, for people to start saving money. They will find something else to spend their money on that they think they need. If we ban books, then kids won't even know what a library is?
They won't be able to just walk into the quiet library, find a good book that they can sit down and be able to escape the reality of the world. When a child dives into a book, it takes them on an adventure and blocks out the reality of the world. If a child is having a hard time at home, for any reason, then they can sit down and pick- up a book and enter into that book like it was their own life that they were experiencing in a new way. If good kids are reading good books then I don’t see what the harm of them is. There is also the fact that school is much harder to do without any books. Of course, you can do it online, but it just isn't the same as something that you can use 3/5 of your senses with. I like something that you can hold, see, and feel in my hands. A new concept is much easier for me to grasp when it is on paper. All this online stuff is hard for me to really understand very well. In conclusion, books should stay. Even though some books might be bad, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t an good books out there to read. Parents need to help children how to make sure a book is not bad. Not to mention if we take books out of the world, then people will not be able to expand their vocabulary by learning new words from the books they read. Overall books are mostly a good influence for people, and they make people feel better after reading
them.
In the article How Banning Books Marginalizes Children, the author, Paul Ringel, states that approximately fifty-two percent of the books banned in the last ten years illustrate “diverse content”, such as race, religion, gender identity, etc. Ringel believes that attitudes about which books are “appropriate” for kids to read have too often suppressed stories about different cultures and life experiences. He basis his argument around the pretext that when libraries stop the banning it will allow kids to learn how to navigate imaginary worlds filled with differences and apply those lessons to their own lives.
if my imagination of having a society without books was true and i wanted to continue reading i would take quick action and memorize a book. in the book The ugly duckling by Hans Christian Andersen because it teaches people that they can find acceptance of themselves, you can change over time, and you always have
In order to understand how banning books in schools affect student learning, it is important to understand why books are banned in the first place. If parents describe a book as inappropriate or offensive for children, they can complain about it to the school district to have it banned. If the school district agrees with the parents, they will ban the book from the school curriculum and forbid teachers from teaching the book to students. Parents might think that the book goes against religious or moral...
...even the books themselves. But the main factor in the decline of books was the censorship by special interest or minority groups who constantly wanted to ban books that they found offensive.
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
...ersy. The logical thing to do would be to cease all attempts to control the people, but the banning of books is anything but logical.
Postman states that Orwell believed books would be banished, and Huxley thought that books would remain, but go unread. In the article, Postman writes, “What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one” (Postman 1). Once again, Huxley is more accurate with his prediction. Books still remain in libraries and book stores, however, only a few people read them. Now a days, society can use e-books, and small tablets like a Kindle or a Nook to read something that now collects dust. With digital books on demand, it is no wonder Huxley felt that there would be no reason to read actual
Number one, as I said: quality of information. Number two: leisure to digest. And number three: the right to carry out actions based on what we learned from the interaction of the first two”(84-85). Books are where people get their information from, banning books basically means the censorship of information.
As the American Library Association notes, books are usually banned "with the best intention…to protect others, frequently children, from difficult ideas and information." (Brunner). If a book has frightening or controversial ideas in them, adults willing often censor that book from children. From 2000 to 2009, of the 5,099 challenges that were reported, 1,639 of these challenges were in school libraries and 30 challenges in academic libraries. (Frequently Challenged Books). At various times in American history, even some of the tamest books have been banned. Harriet the Spy, was banned because it supposedly taught children to "lie, spy, back-talk, and curse." Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl was banned for being too depressing. A Light in the Attic, by Shel Silverstein, was banned because it might encourage kids to break dishes so they won't have to dry them. (Frequently Challenged Books). While some of these excuses are more reasonable than other excuses, the banning of these books prevents the children from empathizing...
Banning Books “It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer.
On the other hand, some people may believe that books should never be banned in school. According to Oscar Wilde, the author of The Picture of Dorian Gray, stated that “The books that the world calls immoral are the books that show the world its own shame”(BuzzFeed). Banning of books does hide the truth about the world from children. At the same time it is to protect them from the evil of the world at a young age. If books were banned until a certain grade this would not shield children from the truth of the world forever. This would shield children from the world until the proper age that they could understand the text.
But they don't know that by reading it they are "indulging in sinful and Godless acts" or that these books are putting them on the fastest train to Hell. I own A Clockwork Orange, Lord of the Flies, To Kill a Mockingbird, Twelfth Night, and Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, all of which have been or are banned. What's going on here? & nbsp; The most frequently challenged and/or banned books in 2001 were: & nbsp;
In conclusion, book banning is necessary because children may be taught bad habits, lose the magical innocence of childhood, and not be mature enough to decide what materials to read. The banning of books, while unfortunate, is needed to help keep children safe and
Book banning in the United States and anywhere else in the world I feel should be abolished. Books are published and written for a reason. The reason is to expand the mind to new things. Sure some books are better than others but there is no reason to challenge or ban books.
The subject of censorship is a very controversial one, especially the banning of books. Many people believe they must protect themselves and others from the "evils" of many classic books and works of art because they can be deemed "indecent" in one way or another. Many believe that this is absurd and censorship in its current form is a violation of our First Amendment right to free speech. Personally, I align myself with the latter, however I do feel there are occasions where censorship is justifiable.