The Necklace Rhetorical Analysis

612 Words2 Pages

Being honest will always be the most important part of a relationship. One lie can either destroy or save the friendship. In “The Necklace”, by Guy de Maupassant, because Mathilde lies to a friend she loses everything. I disliked the story because she only cared about luxurious items,was very selfish, and lied about losing the necklace. If she would have been honest she could’ve saved herself from all the hard work and rough times she went through.
Mathilde at first only cares about having luxurious items. She was always unhappy that she didn't have materialistic things. In paragraph 4 it says, “She dreamed of expensive banquets with shining place-settings, and wall hangings depicting ancient heroes and exotic birds in an enchanted forest.” She spent all her time wishing she was living a different life like her friend Jeanne who she had gone to school with. At school after learning how to act properly like a rich person, she didn’t like that she had all this knowledge and was not able to use it. …show more content…

After getting the invitation to the party instead of being happy she’s angry because she doesn’t have anything fancy and expensive to wear when instead should be glad Loisel got them an invitation to a nice party. After Loisel is nice enough to give her money to buy a new dress, she’s still not satisfied because she wants luxurious jewelry to wear along with the dress. Jeanne was nice enough to let Mathilde borrow a necklace, but it shows that she doesn’t trust her with her nice things since the necklace she gave her was fake. The night of the the party Mathilde becomes as fake as the necklace, pretending to be a person she is

Open Document