Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Perspective on world religion
What is a worldview as it relates to religion
Worldview from a Christian perspective
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Perspective on world religion
This paper will explore the question of how to understand the nature of perceived ultimacy in Zen Buddhism. This will be achieved through providing a justification for why this question should be of any interest and then hypothesizing about possible implications of the results. Next, the framework that is to be used in categorizing the core beliefs in Zen will be explained and made clear. After this description is complete the author will proceed to fit Zen Buddhism into this framework and will demonstrate that the Zen religion is no exception to the employed framework. Finally the author will describe the perceived ultimacy of Zen Buddhism.
The topic of Zen Buddhism and understanding how it fits into a framework that was designed to describe and compare religions is important because religion has a major impact on the world and to be able to understand and “explore” what the world has to offer is an important aspect of existence as a human being. Some might wonder why Zen Buddhism is important when it is not a major religion in the United States, but perhaps that is the very reason it is so important to understand Zen Buddhism and to be able to describe it in a way that allows one to make comparisons with more familiar religions in a standardized framework. Zen Buddhism in particular is interesting in the setting of the United States because as Americans we have had little experience with Buddhism. Shunryu Suzuki related in the book Zen Mind, Beginners Mind, that Americans start Buddhism with a very pure mind, a beginners mind, which allows us to understand the Buddha’s teaching as he meant them to be understood (138).
Suzuki also states in the book that because of this, hopefully, young Americans have the chance to fi...
... middle of paper ...
...if he and the world were just created from nothingness (Suzuki 67), this too is a change in how humans normally experience the world. Wherever Zen Buddhism fits in exactly between secular and spiritual is hard to tell, and like Suzuki said perhaps Zen is a religion before religion and the appreciation of our original nature as strange as it might sound to us is even described as “unusual” to Suzuki himself (124). It is clear however that Zen fits into Young’s framework and perhaps with a beginner’s mind one can make use of this and find for themselves the answers to at least part of the questions about their own life.
Bibliography
Suzuki, Shunryu. Zen Mind, Beginners Mind. New York & Tokyo: Weatherhill, 1982.
Young, William A. The World’s Religions Worldviews and Contemporary Issues.
2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 1995.
Zen themes may be familiar to a student of religion, since they arise from Buddhism. The Buddha, Sidhartha Gautama, is said to have achieved his four noble truths about the nature of existence through meditation.
The book Buddhism Plain and Simple, by Steve Hagen, caught my attention and became more interesting to me than I thought. I have always heard of the religion Buddhism, but I never knew what it was all about. I never thought that Buddhism was as huge as it is. I knew that it existed in other countries, but I never knew what exact countries. Many of the views in this book surprised me and the book taught me a lot about morals and better ways to live your life. The word “ Awareness” is talked heavily all through this book. For Buddhists, this is probably the most important aspect in their religion.
Zen in the Art of Archery, by Eugen Herrigel describes the ritualistic arts of discipline and focus that the Zen religion focuses around. In this book, Herrigel describes many aspects of how archery is, in fact, not a sport, but an art form, and is very spiritual to those in the east. The process he describes shows how he overcame his initial inhibitions and began to look toward new ways of seeing and understanding. In the beginning of the book, Herrigel tells us that he is writing about a ritual and religious practice, “whose aim consists in hitting a spiritual goal, so that fundamentally the marksman aims at himself and may even succeed in hitting himself.” (Herrigel p. 4).
He believes in the concept of self-awareness, mindfulness, and acceptance, which corresponds with the Pantheistic, Buddhist view of his life (Fittipaldi, 1982, p. 69-71). As for his naturalist, humanist view of life, there is no nature to a God. The humanist believes that a man is apart of nature and there is nothing else that exists outside of the world that he should experience (Norman, 2004, p. 11). The “Christian” part of Zen Christianity lines up with his humanist view due to the belief in compassion. There is compassion for humans because of Christ and in humanists because of them wanting to be connected.
Americans have created their own vision of Buddhism with the unique understandings of the United States, its objectives and potential. Their idea of what a good or “mindful” society should be like is influenced by their beliefs. Such beliefs include: the specific qualities that Americans should have, the practices they should engage in, their participation in politics, law, education, legal and medical systems, the military, and so on. The adoption of mindfulness to all these important aspects that are highly valued by Americans is how the believe they create a good, mindful
Zen Buddhism teaches of a concept called wu-nien, or “no-thought”. This of course is not a literal absence of thought, but it is rather a detachment from the thou...
The Buddhist claimed that "to be concerned with speculative questions is like being concerned with the origin of a poisoned arrow while it is still in one's flesh, contaminating the bloodstream." Kasulis writes that a conflicting group supposed that nothing at all continued from the cause into the effect, that the two where completely distinct. The Abhidharma Buddhist scrutinized the principles behind the Buddhist teachings. Zen Action, Zen Person states that these became almost as important as practicing the teachings; that is the scrutnization of the principles. With all this wrangling over the principles and the debate on them, Nagarjuna came up with his "Logic of the Middle." The origin of this came from the doctrine of sunyata or rather emptiness, which Kasulis states is the "Logic of Emptiness."
First, there is the illusion of essentialism (svabhava), that things are what they appear to be; eventually, after realizing emptiness, the practitioner notices that things are not what they seem to be, but is still evolving within a dual state of thought. Finally, after realizing “the emptiness of emptiness” that he comprehends that everything simply “is”, without making any distinction. The concept of non-duality is therefore very much observed in Zen: reaching this state is the primary objective. It is seemingly a lot harder to recognize the influence of non-duality and no-self in Pure Land Buddhism, there are many things that point to an understanding alike that of Mahayana and Zen. First of all, according to Pure Land, all human beings are inherently and hopelessly evil. It is believed there is no way of ever becoming a good person, because all actions that are outwardly good are self-centered; wanting to become a virtuous person is therefore deemed egotistical and arrogant. This being the Pure Land version of “no-self”: as long as the practitioner is concerned with an “I. It is only once someone has a deep realization (shinjin, or “true entrusting”) that he/she is an evil being, that he can remove the “I” and devoting oneself to a different power that is Amida
Buddhism prevailed as a religion indigenous to west India and comprises of varieties of traditions, beliefs and practices based on the teachings of Buddha. There are many reasons why Buddhism became so popular and entered into many civilizations. Buddhism began to be popular throughout Asia alongside India. Buddhism has blossomed in the contemporary world, especially in the West. It is an issue to wonder what Buddhism offers that other religions cannot and has become so significant worldwide. Buddhism has become an idea that is widespread and the teachings of Buddha have made a real difference in many civilizations like India, China, Japan, Vietnam, Korea and surprisingly Buddhism has come to make a significant difference in American culture.
The popularity of Buddhism in America became most pronounce in the period after World War II. It is interesting to note that the United States had just concluded the most devastating war in human history, with the first use of the atomic bomb on the Empire of Japan, yet the Japanese of style Buddhism took hold in America more than other school after the war. It could be said that the main figure head of Japanese, or more precisely, Zen Buddhism, in America was the author and intellectual Dr. D.T. Suzuki. In terms of the American expression of Buddhism, Suzuki had more influence over the interpretation of Zen philosophy than any other writer of the time.
Many people seek success in their lives, whether it’s wealth, a good education, or a family of their own. Zen Buddhism leads to a different kind of success than that. It brings success in the form of happiness, morality, self-actualization, and lack of stress: most of which one will not take away from Taoism. With origins in China, Zen Buddhism focuses on discipline and meditation as a portal to spontaneity and freedom. Many describe it as a blend of Mahayana Buddhism (originally from India) and Taoism (another philosophy from China). Ultimately, Zen Buddhism is the philosophy that will lead to a successful life because of its principles of showing others unconditional love and compassion as well as letting go of surrounding negativity.
Her spiritual practice up until achieving kensho had been a compilation of different religious traditions in a rather haphazard way to find the Way. She stumbled from tradition to tradition as she never found lasting happiness or peace in any of the traditions that she practiced up until Zen Buddhism. Her miko tradition did not give her peace of mind in the Way, but instead raised more questions about her state of mind, the “gloom” she felt “despite the mysteries, despite the miracles, despite all [her] social service activities” (65), Satomi-san always felt that she was not enlightened, not on the path. This internal questioning had been commonplace for Satomi-san up until she discovered her Zen Buddhism. Zen allowed her to see her experiences from a new viewpoint, a viewpoint that made relative sense of her past, and in turn allowed Satomi-san to align her past and present with her future, allowing her to walk on the Path in a clear concerted manner toward satori, deeper
"What is Buddhism? | The Buddhist Centre." What is Buddhism? | The Buddhist Centre. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2014. .
The Web. The Web. 18 Mar. 2014. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. " The Buddhist World: Lay Buddhist's Guide to the Monk's Rules. "
Eastern enlightenment religions have been gaining popularity throughout the western world for the past few decades, with many people attracted to a "different" way of experiencing religion. As with many other enlightenment religions, Buddhism requires disciples to understand concepts that are not readily explainable: one such concept is that of no-self. In this essay I shall discuss the no-self from a number of modern perspectives; however, as no-self is difficult to describe I shall focus on both the self and no-self. Beginning with psychological aspects, and neurophysiological research on transcendental meditation, I shall discuss the impact of modern brain science on our understanding of the self and transcendence. Next I will outline the relationship between quantum physics and non-locality, as this gives a western scientific explanation for no-self. Returning to the original source of Buddhism, I will briefly outline the discussion between Siddhartha and Vaccha regarding atman, then discuss the mind and no-self and their relationship to liberation. Finally I will summarize a few issues that the western mindset may face approaching this topic.