Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contribution of religion in contemporary society
Religion in India
Contribution of religion in contemporary society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contribution of religion in contemporary society
The Nature of India's Contribution to the World
The major contribution of India, in the world to day, would be in the
sphere of spirituality. In the global division of labour this work has
come to her lot and it is our duty to discharge this responsibility
with sincerity and honesty. One hundred years back, Swami Vivekananda
had said:
"Here in this blessed land, the foundation, the backbone, the
life-centre is religion and religion alone. Let others talk of
politics, of glory of acquisition of immense wealth poured in by
trade, of the power and spread of commercialism, of the glorious
fountain of physical liberty; but these the Hindu mind does not
understand and does not want to understand. Touch him on spirituality,
on religion, on God, on the soul, on the Infinite, on spiritual
freedom, and I assure you, the lowest peasant in India is better
informed on these subjects than many a so-called philosopher in other
lands... We have yet something to teach to the world. This the very
reason, the raison d'être, that this nation has lived on, in spite of
hundreds of years of persecution, in spite of nearly a thousand years
of foreign rule and foreign oppression. This nation still lives; the
raison d'être is, it still holds to God, to the treasure house of
religion and spirituality."
And lest we confuse the ideas of God, religion, and spirituality with
our narrow cynical vision, the following words of Swami Vivekananda
should make us feel at ease and give confidence. While defining
religion and its true form, Swami Vivekananda said:
"Religion is the manifestation of the Divinity already in man."
"Religion is the idea which is ...
... middle of paper ...
...ters of life to the shore of blessedness; if this ship
appears to be leaking, appears to be damaged, take blame on yourself.
Plug the holes with your brains and blood and keep the national ship
afloat. I am come now to sit in your midst and if we are to sink let
us sink together; but never let a curse rise to our lip."
Behind all his (Swami Vivekananda's) patriotism, deep down there was
the spiritual motive. For him India was synonymous with the spirit of
religion. 'If India is to die,' he had said, 'religion might be wiped
off from the face of the earth, and with it the Truth.' He did not
want to see India as a replica of a Western country. His dream of
future India was that of material prosperity along with spiritual
revival, with which she would extend the hand of peace and blessedness
to all peoples of the world.
As I have read the primary sources, it became clear to me that African Americans and Indians wants to be treated equally and fairly. As I read "An Indian's View of Indian Affairs" by Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce, the main thing that caught my attention was "Treat all men alike. Give them the same laws." This caught my attention because he clearly talked about the way he was tired of white men having all of the authority and the chiefs who would always talk about equality or fairness, but fails to show it with their actions. Also, he went on to say that everyone should be treated as one because essentially everyone is one and was born the same way. Basically, his view was an argument to state that it's not right to treat one person better or
The Effects of British Imperialism in India One could approach this topic from two points of view: the British and the Indian. One could choose either party and find very different opinions. When British colonizers first arrived in India, they slowly gained more and more control in India through many ways, the most prominent being trade and commerce. At first, they managed India’s government by pulling the string behind the curtain. However, soon they had acquired complete rule over India, converting it into a true British colony.
...t right, but yet,he never quit. He never said no. In saying that he had to disappear, it’s as if he is stating he had to not see that consequences of his actions. He did not want to get his hands dirty.
Imperialism in India British imperialism in India had many positive and negative effects on both the mother country, Britain and the colony, India. Many people would argue which effects were more prominent in these countries, and some would agree that they were equal. But in both cases, there were actually both. In India, the British colonization had more positive effects than negative. For instance, when the British colonized India they built 40,000 miles of railroad and 70,000 miles of paved roadway.
In India and World Civilizations by D.P. Singhal, the theme is “the cross-fertilization of cultures and the resultig new development” (Embree 451). The author uses artifacts from Mohejodaro and Yucatan, theories of Parmenides, and the revenue system of Ptolemaic Egypt (Embree 451). Singhal discusses the Hellenistic world and the Roman Empire and how it influenced artistic creativity in India. Singhal rejects the idea of Hellenistic and Roman art having any influence on Indian art. Despite having easy access to Christian sources, there isn’t any evidence of India being influenced by Christian thought, according to Singhal.
"All the leadership had spent their early years in England. They were influenced by British thought, British ideas, that is why our leaders were always telling the British "How can you do these things? They're against your own basic values.". We had no hatred, in fact it was the other way round - it was their values that made us revolt." -Aruna Asaf Ali, a leader of the Indian National Congress. (Masani, quoted in Wood, 32, 1989)
Imperialism in India lasted 190 years, from 1757 to 1947. India was taken over by the British for their interests in the potential for power and goods that were available there. However, the British were pressured to take India by some of Europe, including the French and Dutch, because they all wanted to share the resources that could be removed. The overall effects on the British imperializing India were negative.
British Imperialism in India and South Asia forever changed the course of history, having both positive and negative effects on these nations and ultimately resulting in an imperialized system that limited the freedom of citizens in India and brought tremendous wealth to Britain. Imperialism is the policy of extending the rule of a country over other countries or colonies To this degree, Britain took control of India and South Asia because they saw an opportunity for trade superiority and were enticed by the potential these regions held. From the mid eighteenth to twentieth centuries, India was governed by two different variations of British imperialism. First through the British East India Company, perhaps the most powerful private trading entity the world has ever seen, and second, through the direct control of the British government. The British East India Company came to dominate and control India for nearly two centuries, exploiting the nation's resources and rendering them economically and socially delayed . These centuries of imperialism ended in many issues in India, including economic instability, social inequity, crime, and political corruption. These factors drastically altered their culture, forever changing India's future potential, primarily for the worse. While the British carried out many modifications that seemed, at first, to aid the Indian populace, such changes were irreparably damaging and left the nation helpless and underdeveloped.
The Transformation of the “Indian Problem”. In this paper, I plan to examine the marked transformation and the history of the so-called “Indian Problem.” The idea of an “Indian Problem” began with the arrival of white settlers in North America, and for them, it was a problem of safety, security, and land acquisition. Around 1890, the “Indian Problem” became an issue of how to help the Indians go extinct humanely, or to assimilate into white culture.
Although only recognized as an independent country since August 1947, India has been widely known throughout history. Starting as early as the 27th century BCE with the birth of one of the world’s first highly sophisticated civilization, namely the Indus Valley Civilization, India has been recognized for its rich historical and cultural heritage. While it was only a lot later in its history, specifically during the rule of king Ashoka in the 5th century that the country started to unify; it was during the during the two hundred years of British colonization when this big mass of area in South Asia accepted a unified national flag and became the country that it is today. A country that is home to over 1.2 billion people. A country where its long history has left different layers of deposit that have neither totally merged nor ceased to influence the Indian people. India is one of the world’s most complex societies in which “centuries coexist”, however, this greatness in diversity and culture also seems to hinder development in this country. India has thus been labeled a “third world”, but before we go any further let us try and find out what that means. What is a third world country and how does a country like India fit the image? By 1921, about 84 percent of the world had been colonized since the sixteen century with approximately 168 colonies. During past two centuries the world has seen an increasing number of new nations being born due to the process of decolonization. As the numbers were increasing, especially after 1945, political theorists sought to find a term to categorize these new nations that were considered qualitatively different from older countries of Europe and Northern America and thus termed them as “Third World...
India and Italy have been part of the world since long time, both of the countries share unique features in them. India and Italy recently started having even stronger bonds with each other. Both the countries are part of ancient civilizations; people of India and Italy have continuous civilization since 2500 B.C.E. Both the countries can be compared and contrasted on the basics of their culture, religion, economy, history and trade stats etc. I have never seen Italy in my life but I hear people from Italy are similar to Indians in most of the ways and Italy itself attracts me as a beautiful country. I always wanted to go to Italy from the start as I have only seen the Italy in pictures and movies. Italy has kept his heads up from the recession as compared to the countries around it like Spain, Switzerland, Austria and Hungary.
When in 1978 Edward W. Said published his book Orientalism, it presented a turning point in post-colonial criticism. He introduced the term Orientalism, and talked about 2 of its aspects: the way the West sees the Orient and the way the West controls the Orient. Said gave three definitions of Orientalism, and it is through these definitions that I will try to demonstrate how A Passage to India by E. M. Forster is an Orientalist text. First, Said defined Orientalism as an academic discipline, which flourished in 18th and 19th century.
Vasco da Gama landed at Calicut, sailing via the Cape of Good Hope in 1498. This marked the beginning of
Indian Culture The Republic of India is located in South Asia. India is home to one of the world s largest populations and is known to be one of the oldest civilizations. These two factors have contributed to the development of rich cultural heritage and diversity, making it a big tourist attraction. However, this diversity has caused serious problems among the people, especially with the different religious views and beliefs.
The British invasion formed into a historical development of British colonialism in India. Despite India under the British rule, Mahatma Gandhi played an important role in gaining Independence. He not only changed India but also strongly fought for India's independence, using various strategies. The British Empire ruled as long as they could to reform India both politically and socially.