Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Constructivism theory and world politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Constructivism theory and world politics
‘If you are going through Hell, keep going!’ When he was sworn in on January 20, 2009, the newly elected President Barack Obama could have had in mind this quote from Churchill for he was facing not only a still unstable new world order inherited after the end of the Cold War, but also an economic crisis qualified by many specialists as the worst since 1930. The political equation required to solve the problem wasn’t to be found on a dusty shelf and needed imagination. Therefore his democrat administration carried on building the policy and the strategy mentioned during the campaign. Highly influenced by Clinton’s, bound to initially follow the steps of the previous Bush era, they traced a path based on a comprehensive approach to the situation they were facing. This led to an inclusive response, involving any available actor. In terms of security, the answer is stated in the National Security Strategy (NSS) released on May 27, 2010. The NSS combines the three theories (Realism, Liberalism and Constructivism) governing US behavior in the realm of international relations. In the meantime, it meticulously follows the precepts of Smart Power promulgated by Joseph S. Nye. Nonetheless, Obama’s deliberate will to influence the rules of international relations, relying on a holistic approach of the world, obvious in the second part of the NSS (Strategic Approach), is indubitably constructivism. An analysis of the president’s ends, ways and means will highlight this thesis. The goals sought in the Strategic Approach of the NSS are US leadership, security, a robust economy, respect for universal values and a collaborative universal order providing peace, security and opportunity. American leadership will be strong and responsible across ... ... middle of paper ... ...to Theory and History, ninth edition, Joseph S. Nye, Jr. and David A. Welch, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2013 NSS p8 Ibid Ibid NSS p10 Ibid NSS p11 NSS p12 Ibid NSS p16 NSS p14 Ibid NSS p15 Bibliography: - Churchill, Winston, in Finest Hour, The Journal of Winston Churchill, accessed 9/7/2013 p.31 from https://www.winstonchurchill.org/images/finesthour/vol.01%20no.141.pdf - Gallemore, Galeb, in the video ‘Theory in Action: Constructivism’, accessed 9/7/2013 at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYU9UfkV_XI - Nye, Joseph S. and Welch, David A., Understanding Global Conflict and Cooperation: an introduction to theory and history, Ninth edition, PEARSON, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2013 - Obama, Barrack, 44th President of the United States of America, NSS 2010 http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf
..., SJ. “Soft, Hard or Smart? What is the right choice for Obama?”. Defence Research Paper, JSCSC, 2008/2009.
Ninth ed. of the book. New York: Worth, 2014. 468 - 71.
Churchill, Winston. "Their Finest Hour." Their Finest Hour. The Churchill Centre, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2013.
As we move steadfast into the twenty-first century we are confronted with more complex and compromising issues affecting the intricately connected global system. New forms of aggression and threat are the faces that greet policy-makers as they spend countless hours configuring ways to counter future attacks such as terrorism or massive drug trafficking within and across national borders. Instead of submitting ourselves to the tyranny of chance, which cruelly deals out futures blighted with catastrophes that can remain vivid in our memories, President George W. Bush has issued a mandate in an attempt to regain control over future acts of aggression such as terrorism in the United State; he issued the Executive Order of Homeland Security as that initial step.
Butler, Chris. "The Flow of History." Welcome -. N.p., 1 Jan. 2007. Web. 19 May 2014. .
In no field other than politics does the justification for action often come from a noteworthy event and the true cause stays hidden behind the headlines. The United States’ transformation from a new state to a global superpower has been a methodical journey molded by international conditions (the global terrain for statecraft), the role of institutions and their programmed actions, and ultimately, the interests of actors (the protection of participants in making policy’s items and i...
Duiker, William J., and Jackson J. Spielvogel. World History. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomsom Learning, 2001. 374-438.
In order to fully comprehend the reasons for Churchill’s speech and the vast response of relief from the population, one must understand the events leading up to its giving. On June 4
Winston Churchill was perhaps one of the greatest public speakers in history. Some of the best speeches have come from being in life or death situations, Winston was known best for this. His small sound clips like, “this was their finest hour”, and “this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning”, encourage his troops and his people that they will win this war and will overcome the greatest odds. Although Churchill told many speeches, his speech on June 18, 1940 showed the most emotion and courage of any other speech he told. In this speech he explained that the war in France is over and the war in Britain would begin. He said that if we fail then the world sink into an abyss. This emotion that he shows would give Britain hope, courage and most of all determination.
Perry, M., Davis, D., Harris, J., Laue, T. V., & Warren, D. J. (1985). A history of the world (Revised Edition ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
The Tenth edition. Edited by Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. New York: Longman Publishers, pp. 113-117. 371-377.
Ellis, Elizabeth Gaynor, and Anthony Esler. World History: The Modern Era. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007. Print.
The Soviet Union’s collapse at the end of the Cold War left the United States without its major global rival. Now alone at the top, the United States’ strategic imperatives have shifted remarkably. The shift has been significant enough to prompt fundamental questions about the international order and whether this new “unipolar moment” will last. Indeed, since 1989, political scientists have clamored to define the United States’ status relative to the rest of the world. Indispensable nation? Sole super...
Meiertöns, H. (2010). Doctrines of U.S. Security Policy: An Evaluation Under International Law. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved July 2, 2011 from EBSCOhost
Works Cited Duiker, William J., and Jackson J. Spielvogel. World History. 6 th. -. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Pub Co, 2010. print.