Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Value and importance of monuments
The importance of monuments
The importance of monuments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Art is an expression of human creativity. Artistic objects include various visual representations such as monuments, structures, museums, paintings and sculptures. Robert M. Edsel, the author of The Monuments Men: Allied Heroes, Nazi Thieves, and The Greatest Treasure Hunt in History, illustrates the effort made by men to conserve art during World War II. This war demolished various European cities and artifacts. During the war, a team of men bonded together to save these artifacts. The goal was not only to save the art from the destruction of the war, but also most notably from Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party. Were The Monuments Men’s causes important to the war? Was art worth the protection of The Monuments Men and possibly their lives? Art
Art is a key element in understanding history and culture. It is the written words, drawings, constructions of a nation. Eric Mortimer Wheeler, an archaeologist and British officer, was part of one of the first efforts to conserve art during the war. A fellow officer asked Eric Wheeler how important the destruction to buildings in Leptis Magna, a great city of a Roman emperor, by the British army were. His words were, “They’re irreplaceable. They’re history. They’re… It’s our duty as soldiers to protect them, sir. If we don’t, the enemy will use that against us (Edsel 35)”. Another example of art’s importance is seen when Walter Hancock gave a Torah to a Jewish chaplin. It was previously thought by Jewish survivors at his previous service that all Torah scrolls were destroyed. When the Jewish chaplin brought it to his next service, the scroll received great emotional response, “the people weeping, reaching for it, kissing it, overcome, with joy at the sight of the symbol of their faith (Edsel 310)”. Art protection was crucial during World War II. “This was the moment of art conservation; there was not a second to lose if the world’s cultural patrimony was going to be preserved (Edsel 27)”. The Monuments Men were a group of skilled technicians tasked with the job of conserving art at the time of World War II. “Their initial responsibility was to mitigate
The Monuments, Fine Arts, and Archives (MFAA) “was still struggling to become relevant (Edsel 52)”. For example, when Private First Class Lincoln Kirstein arrived in England to join the Monuments Men operation, no one informed he was coming or have even heard of The Monuments Men. “The base at Shrivenham was filled with civilian experts and Civil Affairs officers, but there was no military structure in place for the MFAA organization at all (Edsel 223)”. Additionally, when a list of monuments that were to be protected during Operation Overload in France, the following illustrates the view of others on the importance of this Monuments Men document during the war. “The MFAA list of Protected Monuments was rejected by field officers as too comprehensive and detrimental to battlefield maneuvers (Edsel 64).” The MFAA was not taken as seriously as other soldiers, and that was because their job about preserving art was not seen as that
Monuments and museums are arenas of public history and for the formation and articulation of identities and narratives.[1] Decisions taken as to the formation of museums and the selection, display and organisation of exhibits are influenced by criteria which are not necessarily politically neutral; these may especially involve devices of political elites to emphasise aspects of communal togetherness and thus exert control over communities.[2] Memory and commemoration of past events and generations is by its nature a political and contested act, especially in sharply divided societies.[3] It is no surprise that recently established governments and states should particularly concern themselves with the production of such forms of festivities, commemorations, and monuments.[4] As rulers of a sharply divided society, unionist elites in Northern Ireland in the aftermath of its eventful creation in 1920-1 had particular reasons to concern themselves, and did concern themselves, with such strategies of power.[5] The integration of the province's Catholic minority may have been, or may have been felt to be, beyond the rulers of Northern Ireland;[6] but this very fact heightened the importance of preserving the highest possible degree of political unity under unionist hegemony among the Protestant majority.[7]
Although the complete listing of the names of those killed in action or missing in action, the horizontality, reflectivity, and subdued, un-heroic and apolitical tone were more or less mandated by the memorial's sponsors, Lin's one genuine innovation was to list the dead and missing chronologically, rather than alphabetically, that latter being the accepted norm in military monuments. Lin quotes the purpose of the memoria...
...r figure out what these paintings really stand for. In recent years they have been painted over and redone in certain areas, so something needs to be found before there are no paintings left.
History has a strange way of coming back around when it comes to human civilization. It has been said repeatedly that those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it. However, just because there is a potential for danger in the future, this does not mean that humanity must ignore what once was. History is normally remembered through what is known as a memorial. When a memorial is put into physical representation, it is then known as a monument.
Americans have often used art to symbolize the relationship between themselves and their history. Therefore, art is used to honor and remember someone or an event where people died, through a memorial. As an example, The National World War II Memorial is a memorial to honor and remember the people who served in World War II. The success or failure of a memorial depends on how well it represents the image that people have of a certain person or event. Especially in America because they find the construction of a national monument so controversial that no memorial has been erected in the National Mall without a discussion. The National World War II Memorial on the National Mall was a poor addition; its location diminishes the formerly open space between the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial, its design is vague, and it is a poor choice even when compared with the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. A very good start.
James B. Gardner, “Contested Terrain: History, Museums, and the Public,” The Public Historian 26.4 (Fall 2004), 11-21
As with many advances in industry and technology, we can thank war for increasing the interest in research for art conservation. After the Great War, the British Museum unpacked its collections after wartime storage in the Underground railway tunnels. Many items had unexpectedly deteriorated in a relatively short time; iron had rusted, bronze developed green corrosion, pottery and stone objects were covered in growth of salt crystals. The museum then decided to set up a permanent scientific research laboratory to further its understanding of the causes of deterioration of materials and learning methods of treating its effects. Conservation of art is now a full-time academic pursuit with Master’s programs at many universities in the United States with the intent to study, prevent, maintain, and restore cultural work.
The Haus der Kunst, or House of Art, is an art museum located in Munich, Germany. The rich history of the museum and the city in which it lies is strongly tied to the Nazi party’s rise to power. The construction of the exhibits and the museum itself was strongly propelled by Hitler’s efforts and his opinions on art: on what to preserve and what to destroy. The museum and what it portrays has changed in many ways from the original vision Hitler held for it, survived through WWII, and still remains a prominent museum in Germany today (“Historical Documentation”).
Monuments are everywhere, whether to honor a person, place, or thing. They are important in remembering a cultural heritage or an event that took place. Memorials have been built for thousands of years to remember the fallen. A great deal of contemplation is put into the mere idea of a monument. There are a few specific concepts to keep in mind before constructing a monument, which these three monuments so obviously embrace.
Nowadays, historians and scholars tend to emphasize that memory has become extinct from the cultural domain. Hence, as the historian Pierre Nora had emphasized “people talk so much about memory only because there’s none left” (Assman 1). Even though the “experiential memory” (Assman 4) has started to fade due to the lesser number of the victims of the war, in the contemporary era new “new forms of memory” are being introduced that provide “access to the past” (Assman 6) through memorials, museums, and recollection of archives. Of course, scholars such as Erica Doss, have claim that in our century cultures suffer from a memorial mania, “an urgent desire to express and claim those issues in visibly public contexts” (2). However, building statues
In general, pieces of art are categorized into one group of artifacts that give insight about a specific time period and culture in history. During the World War II, Adolf Hitler destroyed thousands of pieces of art that were produced by Jews. He ultimately was attempting to erase their culture by destroying their artwork and other belongings. The movie, The Rape of Europa, gives a detailed account of Hitler’s attempt to destroy a large sum of artwork, Hitler’s desire to create a museum with, what he considered, valuable artwork, and the challenges soldiers faced to save pieces of art from being destroyed.
Without out art people would not understand the past and be able to learn from their mistakes. As stated by Frank Stokes in the Monuments Men movie, “You can wipe out an entire generation, you can burn their homes to the ground and somehow they'll still find their way back. But if you destroy their history, you destroy their achievements and it's as if they never existed. That's what Hitler wants and that's exactly what we are fighting for,” (Stokes). By allowing people to understand just how precious art is, they are able to see the significance and how without it they would not be here today. The excerpt also shows that you can take away everything from people and they can still manage to rebuild and live one, but without art it's like they never existed. This journey that the Monuments Men went on in 1943, was crucial in the development of culture in Europe. Some of the artwork that was stolen included The Ghent Altarpiece and The Bruges Madonna, created by two of the greatest artists of the Renaissance; Hubert and Michelangelo. These world renowned pieces would have been destroyed if it were not for the perilous journey of the Monuments Men. These artworks helped to shape the culture of Europe and the United States into what it is today. The artwork recovered was invaluable, making the cost of it worth more than a human life, proved in the paramount expedition of the Monuments
Monuments are a symbol of a significant time in history. Monuments represent life, death, success, and struggle just to name a few. They have become as important to society as the events they represent. They bring history alive to new generations and memories to those who experience them firsthand. Monuments create a bridge between generations. Many parents feel a certain indescribable joyfulness when they see the look in their child’s eyes they had went they viewed the same monument.
.... As every era, every civilization leaves behind monuments and artistic culture in the form of cities and works of art, all this forms the basis for the nation’s memory of its historical heritage.
this view and says on the contrary if a pieceof art is lost today its