The Mary Prince: The History Of Mary Prince

1002 Words3 Pages

The History of Mary Prince is the story of the first female British slave to escape slavery. The book is told by Mary herself, and was used to help the anti-slavery movement. This book is the main source of information on Mary’s life, but there is no way to ensure that all of it is authentic. One should be aware of who truly had the control over this book, and how it may have affected whether or not all of the stories Mary had to tell got in. Without following the standard expected of her, she may not have ever been able to share her experiences like this. Mary Prince was able to convey her story of slavery to others by following the expectations set by the Antislavery Society, such as emphasizing Christianity, only including likable character …show more content…

It was important for her to be seen as an innocent victim. Because of that, any negative personality traits were most likely ignored. Ferguson elaborated on this in her introduction. “Mary Prince took full advantage of their trust to stake out a path to freedom.” (17). While Mary’s owners were certainly in the wrong for every action, the fact that Mary took advantage of their trust would not be seen as a desirable trait. This is just one example of where the actions Mary took may have been glossed over to put her in the most flattering light. The main way this story caught attention was through Mary’s descriptions of the brutality of slavery. It was there to make the reader sympathize with Mary, and by doing that learn to sympathize with all slaves. If Mary acted out in a way that was unflattering, readers may not sympathize with her as well. The fact that Mary became a Christian is still an important note to keep in mind. Going behind anyone’s back would be seen as wrong, and this would not be acceptable in a book about a Christian woman. This role was so important for Mary to maintain that people were willing to risk losing valuable content in the story in order to avoid making Mary look like a bad …show more content…

It is horrifying to think of how censored this book seems to have been, that there were worse abuses not even brought up. It is important to understand that this book was not Mary’s complete story. It was paraphrased to ensure a better understanding for the readers, but through that some content may have been lost. Mary’s status as a Christian also majorly affected which stories were included and which were not. It seems that the goal set by the makers of this book was to show the harshness and brutality of slavery while keeping Mary Prince poised as an innocent victim. The audience had to know that she suffered, but they could not let them know absolutely every way she suffered. This book was made to help convince the public to abolish slavery, rather than to detail the entire life of Mary Prince. Because Mary Prince chose to play by the rules set for her, she was able to get her story, or at least part of it, known to the

Open Document