Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The man who was almost a man story
The man who was almost a man story
The man who was almost a man thesis analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The man who was almost a man story
In the short story “The Man Who was Almost a Man” we read about a young seventeen-year-old African American boy named Dave, who is struggling with the fact that he is still seen and treated as a child. In his attempts to be viewed as mature and earn the respect of his community, he buys a gun with money given to him by his mother. He believes that with a gun in his possession others will be forced to respect him the book states, “…if he were holding his gun in his hand, nobody could run over him; they would have to respect him.” The passage I chose was when the crowd had formed after Jenny the mule was shot by Dave, and they were trying to get to the bottom of the incident. Immediately the townsfolk were doubtful Dave’s faux story that Jenny impaled herself on the plow, and began interrogating Dave for the truth. While his story was …show more content…
Hawkins aren’t that angry. Instead they seem to view it as a childish mistake rather than a crime, “Somebody in the crowd laughed. Jim Hawkins walked close to Dave and looked into his face. ‘Well, looks like you have bought you a mule, Dave.’ ‘Ah swear fo Gawd, Ah didn go t kill the mule, Mistah Hawkins!’ ‘But you killed her!’ All the crowd was laughing now.” (Wright) If the crowd had viewed Dave as an adult, the atmosphere might have been less lighthearted, and would have been treated as a much more serious offense. This fact bothered Dave especially as later that day while in bed he was thinking of the incident, “Something hot seemed to turn over inside him each time he remembered how they had laughed.” (Wright) He knew that the townsfolk didn’t take him seriously, and that this event just furthered solidified that he was still a child in the eyes of his peers. So instead of sticking around and trying to build his reputation again, and paying off the death of the mule, he hopped in a boxcar of a train so he could, “[go] away to somewhere, somewhere he could be a
He continues to ask questions and the main character responds with, “I don’t know, maybe the guy who done them all in is dead” (Pancake 87). As you can conclude from the context throughout their conversation, it made him very uncomfortable talking about the murdering of the hitchhikers. He was afraid that the boy would find out it was him. As the main character and the hitchhiker come to know each other along the ride he comes to the problem of whether or not to murder him as he has done to all the others in the
Dave still continues to behave as a child throughout the short story. “Dave’s attempt to get money from his mother to buy the gun reveal that he in fact is still a child; he whines wheedles and beg, and his mother responds as if he were a child.’(Loftis 439) When presenting the idea of owning a gun to the man who owns it Dave was given a response such as this: “You ain’t nothing but a boy. You don’t need a gun.”(Wright 900) Members of the community do not find Dave mature enough to own a weapon such as this. He has not exerted any actions or characteristics that members of the community find fitting for a man. Dave has only seemed ,as seen in the text, to exert behavior of a child. In both scenarios of Dave obtaining the gun and killing the Jenny with the gun; Dave wanted to hide his actions and lie about what he has done. When presented with opportunities to act as adult and prove maturity Dave goes astray and acts as if he were a child instead of the young man he would like to be seen
When the professor Greg Hampikian decided to write “When may I shoot a student” He was trying express his own opinion to the Idaho State Legislature about the bill that allows for guns to be on the college campus of Boise State University. Greg tells us why he thinks this bill is really not needed by saying “I think we can all agree that guns don’t kill people, people with guns do.” He goes on to make many different examples of how the bill might be misunderstood and why it would be pointless to add the bill that will allow people to have a gun on campus. Greg is wanting to know why the Idaho State Legislature would create a problem when there is not a problem in the first place. Greg goes on being ironic when he is pointing out that the only crime on the campus is when students cheat on a test or experiment with drugs, he even go as far to say that the campus has a murder rate of zero.
Also, the author’s intention of mentioning that the bus and the passengers were departing could be to reemphasize Charley’s isolation. The author tends to list out Charley’s struggles and the events from the war to increase the effect it left on the reader, emphasizing the grief in Charley’s life. As the passage progresses, the reader learns about the child who Charley initially ignores. However, the spatial description of Charley and the boy is very metaphoric. A key scene in the passage is that of the boy on the bicycle near the gates of the graveyard....
In the article “Peaceful Woman Explains Why She Carries a Gun” Linda M. Hasselstrom, explains a series of events that prompt her to an important decision. It was a decision that changed her life. Hasselstrom is a respected writer who has written several books on based on personal, life experiences. In this particular article she gives examples of events that have occurred to her that forced her take a decision of carrying a gun. She explains that throughout her 10 recent years there were varies occasions where she saw herself in a dangerous situation. During those 10 years she constantly experienced situations where she saw she needed protection, and a simple self defense class wasn’t going to help. She became aware of her surroundings and eventually had experience on what to do in those types of dangerous situations. Although carrying a gun for her was something she needed when it came to protection, she also had to learn that it was a huge responsibility.
"Being Prepared in Suburbia" is an essay by Roger Verhulst published in 1992. The purpose of this essay is to show how guns can change a person's mind and emotions. Throughout the essay, Verhulst shares personal examples of his beliefs of gun ownership and personal examples of how his life changed once he bought a Crossman Power Master 760 BB Repeater pump gun. After purchasing the gun, he believed that the reason people like guns so much is because of a passion that gun owners feel. He stated, "This is the feeling that explains their passion, their religious fervor, their refusal to yield. It's rooted in the gut, not in the head" (Verhulst 342). He also realized that personal thoughts and morals about gun ownership change for a gun owner, and, in a sense, how the gun has authority over an individual's life. For example, "But a roving opossum that took up residence in our garage for a few cold nights in January undermined my good intentions" (Verhulst 341). Honestly, those are only excuses and not legitimate reasons. A strong person would not go against his or her beliefs and would know that using a gun should only be for a specific and valid purpose. Throughout the essay, he believes the weak gun legislation and the problems with gun usage are because of a passion that you feel in your gut; in reality, it is a lack of self-control.
The Great Depression of the 1930’s caused widespread poverty, but the popular culture of the time did not reflect this. People wanted to escape from this harsh time so movies, dancing and sports became very popular. Radios broadcasted boxing matches and boxers became stars. The heavyweight champion James J. Braddock aka “Cinderella Man,” gained popularity. James Braddock gained fame by winning many fights and proving everyone wrong when they said he was too old and couldn’t win.
He still faces many problems when trying to get the gun due to the fact that he was treated like a kid and that he acted like a kid. When he went to the store Joe, the sales guy, even treated him like a kid. Joe knew that Dave’s mom kept Dave’s money, because he wasn't responsible enough to hold his own money. The fact that Dave’s mom held on to the money that he worked for shows that he is still just a kid who needs his mom's permission; so therefore, his mom is a force holding him back from becoming a man. Even though Joe said he was a kid he still offered him a gun for a two bucks, so Dave goes back to his house to try a get money for the gun. He waited till he was alone with his mom because he was afraid of his dad, which also shows that his father is another force that prevents him from becoming a man. Dave had to argue with his mother a little bit before she finally agreed, but
Dave sees the gun in the story as an easy way to gain the respect of the other men and the fields and an easy way to become a man. Dave goes to visit Joe, who is a white man, at the beginning of the story to try and purchase a gun from his Sears catalog that he keeps at his store. When Dave gets home you can see the simple lifestyle they live in and how his parents are not particularly kind to him. Dave must beg his mother for the gun and his money to buy the gun. Richard Wright suggests that in this way, Dave is very childish and not yet ready to be a man.
Again we see Dave keeping secrets when he lies what actually happened the night he came home with blood on his clothes. Dave claims the blood on him is from a mugger, but Dave does not tell anyone whom he actually killed until the end of the movie. Dave keeps this secret to himself, because he does not want to be reminded of his past and talk about what happened to him when he was a little kid all those years ago.
One of the first arguments is that in a world without guns, the deciding factor in many violence-related situations is physical ability. Harris claims that the world without guns is “one in which the advantages of youth, size, strength, aggression, and sheer numbers are almost always decisive.” The logic behind this is quite justifiable and calls for serious point in the issue. To support this, he references that police are unable to respond and arrive before anything could happen. Though a major weakness in this argument is that the physically superior being could just as well be the one possessing a firearm. In cases where all present are armed, outcomes would be determined by skill and the type of firearm. Harris addresses this by raising the question of which firearms could plausibly be prohibited. Due to the political influence of the NRA and the laws of concealment and hunting, Harris considers handguns and rifles to be the key issue. His argument is weakened due to making a large claim, handguns are the most frequently used firearms in gun violence cases, yet he does not provide any evidence to back up this statement. On the other hand, his claims that handguns are not in the pool of plausible weapon bans gain more credibility by referencing Supreme Court cases. Instead, he focuses attention on how an armed person could change a situation for the better.
Most people believe that, owning a rifle is for protection, but in reality, they own guns just for possessing seek. The gun in the boy's hand has a tag on it, which stated, "gun culture" which has an important advantages in the way of live of the people relating to their ability to posses rifles in the United States of America. One can not even imagine the number of people roaming about carrying rifles as they say "my gun is for protection". which signifies the ethos Mr. Ziglis used to show that he is from the United states of American and has seen many things to make him depict such a great idea in his
The story begins with Dave telling the reader a little about himself and his old job as a bouncer at a nightclub. He appears to be your average 40-year-old; he talks about providing for his family, playing with his kids, drinking with his buddies, and watching Fraiser. However, throughout the story, the reader gets a more and more in depth look into the mind of Dave.
In Anderson’s “Departure,” the main character is a man named Mr. George Willard, and as the storyline unfolds the readers are walked through his final moments in his hometown of Winesburg before his life is changed in new, big city. After his final goodbyes to his friends, Mr. Willard climbed aboard, took a seat, and began reminiscing this town “Things like his mother's death”(Anderson, 11). George, upon his departure, began thinking of his upcoming adventure “The young man’s mind was carried away... With the recollection of little things occupying his mind... car window the town of Winesburg had disappeared and his life there had become but a background on which to paint the dreams of his manhood.”(12). Willard leaned back into his seat throughout his train ride to the new city emotionally thinking
Hasselstrom. In this essay the author, a pacifist, explains why she feels the need to carry a gun. She begins by describing her line of work as a freelance writer and the isolated area she lives in. She then goes on to recall events from the past years where she has felt threaten or unsafe. One such incident was a camping trip she took with her friend where fellow campers made them feel uncomfortable. Another event was that of a woman who had car troubles, she called for help but reached a rapist who assaulted her. The author continues to recall more personal incidents such as being followed by men who harassed her on a narrow bridge, another man with a shotgun who made her realize how isolated her ranch was, and one evening when a light was on in her home. These events prompted her to learn Kung Fu, yet she still felt unsafe and decided on carrying a gun. Despite being hesitant at first to carry a gun it has proven to be the best deterrent when faced with a threatening situation, simply showing the gun has been enough to protect