Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nazi propaganda during the war
Moral relativism Essay
Moral relativism Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Isa Blagden, an English novelist in the early 19th century, once said, “If a lie is only printed often enough, it becomes a quasi-truth, and if such a truth is repeated often enough, it becomes an article of belief, a dogma, and men will die for it” (Blagden 155). Blagden expounds within this excerpt how political and social leaders disguise falsities with the perception of popularity. Most famously, this technique was exploited by the Nazi leader, Joseph Goebbels, under the moniker of the “big lie”. However, as demonstrated in the movies The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance and The Dark Knight, dogmatic beliefs creating the foundation for social structures are present in even the most liberal, progressive societies. The movies The Man Who Shot …show more content…
Within both movies, the stability of the society derives from the populous turning a blind eye to the immorality that underlies their respective societies. Within The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, the townspeople look towards Tom Doniphon rather than the Marshall to oppose Liberty Valance and maintain peace. For example, when Liberty Valance harasses Ransom in the diner, the other attendees allow Tom Doniphon to stand alone against Liberty Valance (add citation). The townspeople implicitly accept that the law is built on the balance between Tom and Liberty, rather than any formal legal code. The standing posture of Liberty Valance and Tom Doniphon in contrast to the sitting positions of the townspeople further symbolizes the town’s reliance on Tom to maintain order. The only formal representation of the law, The Marshall, is typically absent and treated as inept, such as when Nora Ericson treats the Marshall as a child when he shows fear towards Liberty Valance (add citation). Similarly, in The Dark Knight, the citizens of Gotham also accept their own corruption by promoting the Batman, a vigilante restricted by no law, as seen in him ignoring the limits of jurisdiction when capturing Lau (add citation). In both movies, the demos ignore the outside forces superseding their judicial …show more content…
Within The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, Ransom accepts the role of a political leader, even though his fame derives from a lie. Even after Tom tells Ransom that he had shot Liberty Valance (add citation), Ransom perpetuates the lie and uses the fame from the lie to fuel his political career (add citation of train scene of credentials). John Ford also demonstrates this relationship between Tom’s lie and Ransom’s rise to fame by cutting directly from the image of Tom’s burning house to a cheering crowd for Ransom (add citation). Ransom begins the movie as a young idealist that truly adheres to the supreme powers of the law, but ends the movie by contradicting all these virtues by building his career on deceit. Ransom, however, continues this lie, because he prioritizes the positive impact of his political career on the new territory over the truth. Ransom’s lie directly reflects the “noble lie” by demonstrating how social cohesion built on a lie may be best for social order. Similarly, within The Dark Knight, the protagonists Commissioner Gordon and Bruce Wayne both lie to the public to maintain public morale and belief in the judicial system. After Harvey Dent became the tangible symbol of the Gotham judicial system by leading
The short story “The Sniper”, by Liam O’Flaherty and the poem “The Man He Killed,” by Thomas Hardy both use themes of guilt and regret to emphasize how war negatively affects the soldiers fighting it. In “The Man He Killed”, Hardy’s character, a war veteran, wonders what might have happened had he met the man he killed anywhere other than war. The soldier feels a strong sense of confusion and guilt because he realized the man he killed could have been his friend elsewhere. The veteran’s guilt resembles significant similarity to that of O’Flaherty’s character in “The Sniper”. The main character, a sniper in the Irish civil war, unknowingly kills his brother in a battle. The sniper felt remorse even before recognizing the body. The snipers’ sense
The Murderers Are Among Us, directed by Wolfe Gang Staudte, is the first postwar film. The film takes place in Berlin right after the war. Susan Wallner, a young women who has returned from a concentration camp, goes to her old apartment to find Hans Mertens living there. Hans took up there after returning home from war and finding out his house was destroyed. Hans would not leave, even after Susan returned home. Later on in the film we find out Hans was a former surgeon but can no longer deal with human suffering because of his traumatic experience in war. We find out about this traumatic experience when Ferdinand Bruckner comes into the film. Bruckner, Hans’ former captain, was responsible for killing hundreds
...law. The law is based on equality, and though it is often misguided in a town of racism, he continues the case against Frank, as he must uphold the word of that law; not only was he choosing to prosecute on behalf of a character who was, in the novel, seen by many as racially inferior, he was prosecuting against his own brother, a man famed for his heroism.
According to Welch, “The public’s reaction to anti-Semitic films reveals that propaganda had considerable success in persuading the population that a Jewish ‘problem’ existed, but equally that there was a limit to their tolerance of the type of virulently anti-Semitic propaganda to be found in films like Der Ewige Jude and publications like Der Stuermer.” Even after years of Nazi propaganda, even Goebbels wasn’t convinced that “such propaganda had persuaded Germans to condone open violence against
“Trauma. It doesn 't eke itself out over time. It doesn 't split itself manageably into bite-sized chunks and distribute it equally throughout your life. Trauma is all or nothing. A tsunami wave of destruction.A tornado of unimaginable awfulness that whooshes into your life - just for one key moment - and wreaks such havoc that, in just an instant, your whole world will never be the same again”(Holly Bourne, The Manifesto on How to be Interesting). In "Moral Injury," Tony Dokoupil explores the guilt, shame, and regret that burdens countless veterans. In "The Man I Killed," when author Tim O 'Brien kills an individual for the first time it traumatized him as a young soldier in Vietnam. This action wreaks havoc within O 'Brien, altering his
In some situations, Individuals or a group of people can achieve justice and thus, make changes for others. In “Gideon’s Trumpet,” for instance, after being found guilty, Gideon appeals to the Supreme Court stating that his right to have a counsel had been violated. The Court agrees to hear the case, and it turns out that the State of Florida was appointing counsel only in “special circumstances” over the years and if they change the rule many people would be freed. That happens, but Gideon is not freed and is having a new trial instead with a lawyer. He was able to prove that Gideon was not the one who committed the crime but the man who gave testimony saying that he saw Gideon doing it, is guilty of it. In this way, Gideon achieves justice and changes the rule for others like him. Another example is seen in “A Few Good Men” where LT Kaffee with Cmdr. Galloway tries to do an investigation. At first, LT Kaffee doesn’t want to find out new details of the case and is tend to a plea bargain, which is an agreement in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the defender to accept guilt. However, Cmdr. Galloway can convince him to go into details. Thanks to her, they find out that “Code Red” was ordered and LT Kaffee can make Col. Jessep accept that he ordered it. Thus, due to the
The movie came down to liberty and violence verses law, order and freedom of speech, in which the latter prevailed, the latter being Ransom Stoddard. The sad thing was that with Liberty’s death died those living under the law that he lived, too. A prime example of this was Tom Doniphon. He was well respected mainly for his powerful presence and his ability not to be manipulated by anyone including Liberty Valance. However, when Senator Stoddard came back for Doniphon’s funeral, no one knew who Doniphon was. He died with Liberty. The even sadder thing was that he killed h...
He, as in the case of Tom Robinson and Atticus Finch, becomes a victim of the judicial system. Flaws come to light in the judicial system during the trial of Tom Robinson when the jury silently convicts the defendant guilty before the trial begins. Then Mr. Underwood 's meaning became clear: Atticus had used every tool available to free men to save Tom Robinson, but in the secret courts of men 's hearts Atticus had no case. Tom was a dead man the minute Mayella Ewell opened her mouth and screamed” (241). The overwhelming amount of prejudice present in the South during this period ensured an unfair outcome in the trial of Tom Robinson. Coming in with prejudices and stereotypes meant that the actual trial showed little to no purpose; the jury had already made their decision as to the guilt of Tom. Such a system as this takes people’s fears and biases and fashions weapons to slaughter the accused. Despite his own awareness, Judge John Taylor watches helplessly as the jury convicts an innocent man. Racism becomes judge, jury, and executioner for both Atticus and Tom as well, foiling Atticus’ chances at freeing Tom and Tom’s own chances at returning home to his family. These confines of the legal system prevent the Judge from doing what he knows in his heart is right and bind him tightly with laws of
Aldous Huxley’s novel, Brave New World, showcases a world alternate from ours, in a dystopian setting. Where human morals are drastically altered, families, love, history, and art are removed by the government. They used multiple methods to control the people, but no method in the world is more highly used and more effective than propaganda. The world state heavily implemented the use of propaganda to control, to set morals, and to condition the minds of every citizen in their world. However, such uses of propaganda have already been used in our world and even at this very moment.
The story “A Man Who Was Almost a Man” impacted me the most out of all the stories we’ve read. Dave the "boy" in this story uses a gun to symbolize his becoming of a mature man. Although almost everything Dave did as a seventeen-year-old boy was controlled and monitored by his parents he wanted to prove to them and his surrounding adults that he was a man. The gun to Dave was the easiest way of proving "The type of man he has become". The fact that he ends up buying the gun and shows his maturity of using the gun at a young age shows that everyone should not be judged by their age or looks. Later in the story Dave ends up buying the gun for two dollars to show the significance of how mature he can be, and that he is capable of holding a gun and the power to do so. The symbol of the gun speaks power, manliness,
Joseph Goebbels is one of the most influential writers of the twentieth century due to his abilities to persuade the German nation to support Hitler’s Nazi Party and its anti-Semitic values. In 1930, before Hitler’s come to power, Goebbels wrote and disseminated a Nazi propaganda pamphlet meant to persuade the reader to support socialism, hate capitalism, and completely eliminate the Jewish presence in Germany. (Lualdi)
The life of Heinrich Himmler is the perfect example of what happens when hatred and prejudice overpowers one’s conscience and morals.
“"Propaganda is as powerful as heroin, it surreptitiously dissolves all capacity to think” by Gil Courtemanche connects to the sad fact of using propaganda as a deadly weapon to feed people with false information and stop them from thinking. George Orwell’s novel, 1984, describes a totalitarian dystopian society where the Party is constantly brainwashing its citizens with information that is beneficial to its own rights. On the opposite side, people are working for the party just like dominated slaves for their masters without knowing what’s going on. But, in order for the party to achieve this goal, they have to use different techniques of propaganda in Oceania to create fear for people so that they can obey the rules. The use of propaganda in the society of 1984 takes away freedom from individuals because of the absence of privacy, thinking and making decisions.
Justice is used in the novel when Atticus fights for Tom Robinson’s innocence. Even though Atticus knows the case is going to result in Tom being guilty, he still tries to defend Tom. Earlier in the story, Judge Taylor surprisely but purposely chooses Atticus to be Tom’s attorney. It seems like Judge Taylor may want to bring justice for Tom as well. At the end of the heated trial, it’s revealed that Tom is guilty, and the Ewells have won the case. Tom is put into prison and within a few days, he was shot seventeen times while attempting to escape. The outcome of Tom shows a big example of injustice. While Helen is faced with the injustice of her husband, Link Deas provides her with Tom’s former job. With her new job, Helen constantly gets harassed by the Ewells as she walks by their house. Link Deas came along and sweared to Bob that he will protect Helen from their threats and harassment. These are the varied examples of justice that are represented through Atticus, Judge Taylor, and Link Deas.
In 1984 by George Orwell, the society is presented as oppressive, and is set in a totalitarian world. The supreme power in this book is the Party and Big Brother. The Party seeks to control every aspect of life, and is able to alter the ‘truth’ through the manipulation of people’s thoughts, as well as language. Truth is necessary for a functioning society because it allows you to access your freedom of thought, and without truth it allows power to be used for manipulation, perhaps in a bad way.