Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflecrion on peloponnesian war
Reflecrion on peloponnesian war
Reflecrion on peloponnesian war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Peloponnesian War was the most infamous war between Athens and Sparta. Athens and Sparta were the two super powers of their time. Sparta was known for being an unstoppable war machine with its army that was willing to take on anyone. They rose to power by disciplining and educating themselves. Athens on the other hand, were known for their strong navy fleet, however, they were also people of wisdom. They were very intrigued by science, philosophy, art, architecture and literature. They were most famous for creating a new form of government known as democracy, where all the citizens’ rich or poor had a voice on the city’s decisions for its future. The Greek city-state of Sparta had a form of government that mixed various traits of monarchy, …show more content…
oligarchy and democracy. However, Sparta had a duel monarchy with two kings, one that was always in Sparta and the other to lead military, judicial, and religious campaigns.
They had a small oligarchy that dealt with political control. However, democracy is seen in the eyes of Aristotle and Plato as not the most efficient form of government. Athens lost the Peloponnesian through surrender causing the collapse of the famous Athenian Empire. Sparta gained control over Athens and ruled it to their desire. Although, Athens was a democracy during the Peloponnesian War, democracy itself was not a contribution to their loss, Athens lost due to many reasons such as Alcibiades’s betrayal, revolts from allied city-states, loss of their navy and the plague.
The Peloponnesian War lasted from “431-404 bce” and was caused by Athens’s new growing power which posed as a threat to Sparta. The war was viewed in three phases, “the Archidamian War (431-421), the Peace of Nicias and the Sicilian Expedition (420-413), and
…show more content…
the Ionian War (412-404).” The war started in 431, Athens and the Delian League fought against Sparta and the Peloponnesian League. In 421 there was a peace of Nicias. Sparta and Athens initially had a treaty called the “Thirty Year’s Peace” that brought the end of the “first phase” Peloponnesian War. However an underlying series of events caused Sparta and Athens to go to war once again. For example, Athens’s demeanor and intervention towards Sparta’s ally Corinth. Athens intervened in an argument between Corcyra who as supported by Athens and Epidamnos who was supported by Corinth. Eventually after a few years Corinth abandoned the issue. Soon after, Potidaea a colony belonging to Corinth revolted from its rulers. Athens once again intervened, but this time Sparta took Potidaea’s side. Sparta threatened to take control of Attica if Athens were to attack Potidaea. Athens was not threatened and so the war began. Then in 421 Athens captured Scione. Athens also created an alliance between Argos and Corinth. Athens attacked Melos in 416. Once they captured them, they prepared for the Sicilian expedition. During 413 Sparta captures and fortifies Decelea. In 412 the allies of Athens revolted, Athenians started the siege of Chios, arguments between Persia and Sparta began. In 410 the Spartan peace offer was refused and there was an Athenian naval victory at Cyzicus. More allies of Athens started to revolt in 405 BC. The war was over in 404 with Athens surrendering and the walls being torn down. Alcibiades was an intelligent and smart witted Athenian who was best known for being close to Socrates and his demeanor towards the Peloponnesian War that was destroying Greece.
His role in the war, greatly affected the outcome of Sparta’s victory against Athens. Alcibiades was a diplomat and military general who aided the achievement of the Peloponnesian War by influencing Argo, Mantineia and Elis to create an anti-Spartan alliance. The association was altogether defeated, however, Alcibiades managed to escape out of it and avoid any punishment. He then convinced the Athenian navy to use their resources for an invasion on Syracuse in Sicily. The Athenian navy agreed, however, the night before they were supposed to sail, Alcibiades was accused of vandalizing statues of Hermes in Athens. Alcibiades was then sentenced to death, but once again he managed to escape to the enemy, Sparta. Now he was a problem to Athens. Alcibiades gave the Spartans all of Athens’s military secrets and tried to influence Athens’s allies to revolt. Eventually the Spartans got sick of Alcibiades and so he moved on trying to cause chaos in Persia. He then returned to Athens after failing in Persia and they welcomed him back surprisingly. Athens realized his skills as naval commander, so the state drops the charges against Alcibiades. He was placed in charge of the Athenian navy and received great victories over the Spartan navy at Abydos and Cyzicus. Despite of all this, there was a small naval defeat
in Alcibiades’s absence, causing his political enemies to use their power to convince the people to reject him and exile him from Athens once again. When the Athens faced Sparta at Aegospotami, Alcibiades cautioned them of their future. However, he was ignored and Athenians ended up losing their whole navy in a surprise attack by Lysander the Spartan admiral. If it were not for Alcibiades running off and betraying Athens by giving Athens’s secrets away, then Athens would have stood a stronger chance against Sparta. Alcibiades was later murdered by the Spartans. . Athens had many ally city-states during the war. However, during the war, Athens were unable to maintain alliances with their leading allies. For example, Athens relationship with Argives. Athens and Argives would constantly battle and then create alliances afterwards. The reason Argives formed an alliance with Athens was because they would be hidden when Boeta allied with Sparta. However, due to Athens strength and oppression, Argives was pushed into making an alliance with Sparta. The failure to keep allies during the war, affected Athens greatly causing them to lead to their downfall. Athens had to constantly deal with revolts within their allied city-states. These revolts costed Athens a great deal in resources and diverted their attention from the battle at hand. Sparta used the distress in Athens city-states to their advantage by sending out troops to help the revolting cities in hopes of distracting Athens attention. When Mytilenes revolted, Athens had to send forty ships to try to reconquer the city, while Athens itself was fighting against a plague. Some revolts costed Athens many troops and even a commander. The lost at Delium and territory of Sicyon for Athens, gave Boetians and other allies time to build an army. Brasidas captured Amphipolis which meant trouble for Athens, since Amphipolis was the lumber supply for shipbuilding. It allowed control over the bridge that connected Athens’s allies. Argilus then revolted against Athens and aided Brasidas in stealing Amphipolse. Brasidas influenced and aided Scione and Mende to revolt against Athens as well.
Imagine two countries, so different from each other, that conflicts were inevitable. Athens and Sparta were not countries, however, they were city-states of Greece with many contrasting values. Athens was the city of the arts, reading, and writing. Meanwhile, military was the only thing the on the Spartans’ minds. Athens and Sparta differ in many ways due to their governments, economies, and cultures.
... one another until they were no more. From the Persian War to the Peloponnesian the two states had changed a lot of the years. Starting from their greatest alliance yet first moment of subtle rivalry, the Persian War. Although they were indistinctly competing against one another, without each other they could not have dominated. Then there were the two blows to the peace treaty. The first blow being the Athenian assistance in the battle between Corinth and Corycra. The second blow being the idea to burn Corinth’s town down. Although these were remarkable mistakes the Athenians saw nothing wrong with them. Lastly, was the war. In 431 B.C. the Peloponnesian War broke out between the two allies, after all they had been through, their alliance was over. War was bound to happen, although they lived in tranquility for so long, one or the other was destined to break out.
The Peloponnesian War and the Decline of Leadership in Athens Thucydides set out to narrate the events of what he believed would be a great war—one requiring great power amassed on both sides and great states to carry out. Greatness, for Thucydides, was measured most fundamentally in capital and military strength, but his history delves into almost every aspect of the war, including, quite prominently, its leaders. In Athens especially, leadership was vital to the war effort because the city’s leaders were chosen by its people and thus, both shaped Athens and reflected its character during their lifetimes. The leaders themselves, however, are vastly different in their abilities and their effects on the city. Thucydides featured both Pericles and Alcibiades prominently in his history, and each had a distinct place in the evolution of Athenian empire and the war it sparked between Athens and Sparta.
The Peloponnesian War (431-404 B.C.) was a conflict between the Athenian Empire and the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta that resulted in the end of the Golden Age of Athens. The events of the war were catalogued by the ancient historian Thucydides in The History of the Peloponnesian War. Thucydides’ writings showed the ancient Greek belief that there is a parallel between the city-state and the character of its citizens; in order for the city-state to be successful, its citizens must be virtuous. Thucydides did not believe that the true cause of the Peloponnesian War were the immediate policies of the Athenian Empire against the city-states in the Peloponnesian League but rather the fundamental differences in the character of the two city-states
The book written by Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, contains two controversial debates between distinguished speakers of Athens. The two corresponding sides produce convincing arguments which can be taken as if produced as an honest opinion or out of self-interest. The two debates must be analyzed separately in order to conclude which one and which side was speaking out of honest opinion or self-interest, as well as which speakers are similar to each other in their approach to the situation.
The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. "Peloponnesian War (ancient Greek History)."Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, 24 Dec. 2013. Web. 05 Apr. 2014
Thucydides, Dent, J. M., & Dutton, E. P. (1910). The Peloponnesian War. London & New
Sparta and Athens - Explain and Contrast Both Sparta and Athens were Greek city-states. Sparta was a strict military ruled city-state where the people established themselves as a military power early. However Athens was more of a political city-state that was more involved with their economical stature than their military forces. Still changes from the Persian wars would change the powers of the city-state and somewhat unite them.
The roots of the Peloponnesian war can be traced long before 431 BCE, when it officially started. It can be traced back to as early as the Persian Wars, where the Athenians had found their home burned by the hands of the Persians. That disaster left the Athenians with no home and no sanctuary. Even though that was a defeated battle amidst a victorious war, they still had reason to believe that the Persians will come back for more. Apprehensive at the thought of having their city burned yet another time, the Athenians knew they had to do something. Naturally, they chose to get help. Gathering up the neighboring city-states around them, the Athenians formed the Delian League; an alliance working directly to defend the whole of Greece from Persian attacks (Kagan 8). In the beginning, this worked out well; everybody got their say on what went on in the league, and everybody was satisfied. However, the Athenians saw that if they were to take more power, the members of the league would not be strong enough to resist. Therefore, that was exactly what they did; they took more and more power until what was the Delian League became the Athenian Empire (Kagan 8). As they grew even more powerful and wealthy, their neighbors of Sparta and the Peloponnesian League, Sparta's alliance, could not help but notice (Kagan 13). In 431 BCE, lighted b...
The Peloponnesian War was between the Greek cities of Athens and Sparta due to the growing tensions that continued to grow between the two cities that eventually came to a breaking point. The Peloponnesian War, which can be divided into three phases known as: The Archidamian War, The Sicilian Expedition and The Decelean War, is one of the greatest event in Greek history and an analysis of the causes and effects of this war will give us a better understanding for how the cities of Athens and Sparta came to war and the impact it left behind.
In Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War, Pericles commends the ergon of Athenian heroes, which has placed them in the realm of logos, while directing the Athenians to follow these ideals of logos. The maintenance and continued success of Athens' political establishment relies on the prevalence of polis, rationality and discourse over family, emotion and reckless action. However, the indiscriminate turns of fate and fortune, often place logos in opposition with the base, primal nature of ergon. Both Thucydides and Sophocles recognize that when logos conflicts with the unexpected ergon, the preservation of rationality and unanimity among the citizens of the polis depend on the leadership of a single honest leader. In the History of the Peloponnesian War, Thucydides presents Pericles as a man of logos, whom Athens needs to achieve its full potential as an empire and later to rescue her from disaster. Likewise, Sophocles presents Theseus, in Oedipus Colonus, as the perfect successor of Pericles, who returns Athens to its former glory before the end of the war. In these two examples, we see that the dominance of logos over ergon within a polis lies in the ability and logos of the city’s current leader.
Athens and Sparta were both city-states in Classical Greece. While Athens embraced democracy, Sparta was a dictatorial fierce warrior state. Sparta was a militaristic community, Athens was a freethinking, and commerce minded city-state. Modern societies have modeled their government organizational structure and military discipline practices from lessons learned of these ancient city-states. There is much is to be praised regarding Classical Greece for their courage, their progressive thinking and the birth of democracy. However, I think it is important to remember that in both cases, Athens and Sparta were able to sustain their lifestyle on the backs of countless slaves, non-citizens and women and that there is a darker and less romantic side to the past.
The term democracy comes from the Greek language and means "rule by the people."(Democracy Building 2012) The democracy in Athens represents the events leading up to modern day democracies. Like our modern democracy, the Athenian democracy was created as a reaction to a concentration and abuse of power by the rulers. Philosophers defined the essential elements of democracy as a separation of powers, basic civil rights, human rights, religious liberty and separation of church and state. The most current definition of a democracy is defined as a “government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.”(Dictionary.com). The American democracy was greatly influenced by the Athenian democracy. The Founding Fathers of the American democracy borrowed ideas from the Athenian way of governing. Presently, Americans live in a democracy that is much different than that the Athenian democracy, and what the Founding Fathers of the American Democracy envisioned. Although there are some commonalities between Athens and what our Founding Fathers intended, there are major differences as well. Differences between the modern American democracy the Athenian democracy and what the Founding Fathers envisioned are size of the democracies, the eligibility of a citizen to participate in the democracy and how a citizen participated.
To address the question of how Greek democracy ended, you must first see how it started. Around 600 BCE Solon made some of the first changes in Athenian life. His reforms gave freedom and rights to many that had none. During this time period, Solon abolished Draco’s Laws that were currently in place. He ended the practice where the poor could offer themselves as collateral. The penalty for nearly all crimes had been death until his code of law was set in place. Solon established trade rules, encouraging the exportation of olive oil and prohibited that of grains. Grains were needed to feed the populace. However, his reforms didn’t go far enough or last. (Cadoux, 2015)
Because of the tranquil times, the civilization’s society had more time to focus on writing, math, astronomy, and artistic fields, as well as trade and metallurgy. Out of all the city-states of Greece, two excelled over all the rest, Sparta and Athens. Even though they were the most advanced and strong civilizations, they were bitter enemies. While Athens focused mainly on the people’s democracy and citizen rights, Sparta were ferocious and enslaved its original inhabitants, making them unable to leave and kept under a close eye to prevent insurgence (History of Greece:The Golden Age of Greece). Additionally, Sparta had strict and trained soldiers that underwent intense physical exercising and instruction.