Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary devices and their effects
Literary devices english12
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary devices and their effects
The conclusion of “The Locket” was not predictable and I was surprised that Edmund turned up alive after all and that the locket was stolen. I was surprised because the priest takes the locket off a dead soldier who he thinks is Edmund, Octavie mourns Edmund, also thinking he is dead, and finally, when the judge is telling Octavie to stop being sad, it seems as though he is telling her to move on with her life. It seems as though the rest of the story will be about how Octavie recovers from her sadness because of Edmund’s death. I was surprised that Edmund was alive at the end because in the beginning, it seems that everyone is dead and the locket is taken off a dead soldier. Even though the locket is said to be a charm, after the battle, it seems the only people left on the field are dead. The priest finds one of the dead soldiers with the locket around his neck, and since the locket was Edmund’s the priest thinks the dead soldier is Edmund and sends the locket to Octavie. I was also surprised that Edmund turns up alive at the end because Octavie mourns Edmund, also thinking he is dead and believes she will grow old and sad like her Aunt Tavie. She rereads the letter that came with the locket over and over again, and she thinks that it can’t be real. In the story, Octavie thinks, “Oh! …show more content…
She could not believe that one of those dead was her own! with visage uplifted to the gray sky in an agony of supplication.” Octavie thinks she has no more reason to go on living. She thinks, “Why was she here! What further had she to do with life and the living!” Finally, I was surprised that Edmund turns up alive in the end because I started to think that the rest of the story may be about how Octavie recovers from her sadness and grief. When the judge tells Octavie to remove the veil I thought it was so that she could move on with her life and stop being sad about Edmund. The judge asks Octavie to remove the veil since it is out of place with the beautiful day and never to put it on again. He’s telling her to look at the beautiful things in life and that life is worth living rather than to continue to be upset and sad over Edmund’s death. I had the feeling that the judge is trying to help her overcome her sadness and grief, to get rid of the black dress and veil, and to start living her life again. It is only at the end of the story that I was surprised and realize that the nightmare Edmund had of the serpent coiling around his throat was actually his messmate stealing the locket. The conclusion of “The Locket” was not predictable and I was surprised that Edmund turned up alive after all and that the locket was stolen.
I was surprised because the priest takes the locket off a dead soldier who he thinks is Edmund, Octavie mourns Edmund, also thinking he is dead, and finally, when the judge is telling Octavie to stop being sad, it seems as though he is telling her to move on with her life and recover from her sadness even though Edmund is dead. At the end of the story when Edmund says the locket was stolen, that’s when I was surprised and realize that the nightmare he had of the serpent coiling around his throat was actually his messmate stealing the
locket.
I did not like the ending of the story. I found that the ending was very predictable and anticlimactic, especially when all the tension was being built up throughout the rest of the book. When I was nearing the end of the book I was already starting to envision the ending of the book and when I got to the end I was disappointed to see that I was correct. I would have preferred if the ending was more of a cliff-hanger and ended completely different than anyone would have expected.
The novel began with the narrator embarking on a journey to the underworld. As he entered the battle royal, Ralph Ellison set up the narrator’s story using the archetype of the Odyssey. The narrator spends the entirety of the book trying to become enlightened, and to prove to his grandfather and Dr.Bledsoe that he is more than what they think he is. However, the book ends with the narrator stuck in a dark hole, living underground, right back where he started. This contrast to the story of odysseus allows Ellison to demonstrate how the narrator failed to become what he had tried so hard to be, and how his enlightenment had been destined to be a troubled one.
This creates a twist in the plot, making readers discover the true meaning and thinking back to all they had read. Oedipus is told that he has fulfilled his fate and discovering his true identity in the middle of the play, and Mrs. Hutchinson discovers her fate in the middle of the short story as well. This encompasses the full knowledge of the detriments to come. Overall, both dramatizing pieces encompass unknown suspicions that are already evident within communities but not apparent to the readers, yet they are gradually revealed. This creates a captivating plot and accomplishes the goals of the writers – to compel readers to uncover the brutal yet enthralling
Roderick’s sister was also very ill with something that was never diagnosed. In the first few days of the narrator’s visit Ethelred died. She was put into a casket and then the two men carried her to a vault that was below the narrator’s room. Several night later the men noticed sound coming from the vault and went down to investigate. They began to read to each other again, but Roderick paid no attention.
Sir Fortinbras and noble knights of the army of Norway, I stand before you today to tell a tale of a martyred hero to whom we must remember. Hamlet be thy name. He was a friend and a leader. About eight months ago Hamlet was distraught, I'd never seen him like this before. He had a good excuse, I mean his father had just died, his mom, god rest her soul, remarried not even a month afterwards. Hamlet's affair with Ophilia was dwindling in his giant fire of emotions. Ophilia was the kings' servant's daughter. The king's servant was Polonious. Polonious did not want Ophilia with Hamlet, nor did Ophilia's brother Laertes. Hamlet was under a lot of pressure, but it wasn't until a few of the guards and myself saw a ghost whom we believed was Hamlet's deceased father. This was the point of all of our lives were you either take one path or the other each leading you in a total different direction. Hamlet went to the guard tower with us the next night and reasoned to our favor that the ghost did in fact perpetuate the look of King Hamlet. The ghost made a follow me motion to Hamlet and we grabbed him. Please do not follow Sir Hamlet, I pleaded. The spirit was insistent and Hamlets gut instinct drove him to follow the floating omen. I know not the exact words that the ghost spoke that night but from what I understand, he was back from the dead to inform his son that he had not died from the rumorous snake bite which had been presumed. King Hamlet's brother, the current King Claudius, had murdered him while he lay in the garden by pouring poison in his ear. The ghost also informed Hamlet of an affair that his mother had been having with Claudius. This bit of information stunned and enraged if you will Hamlet. Hamlet knew not what to believe. After all the ghost could have just as easily been the devil himself for all we knew.
...oke about is the consequence of a man gone insane. He truly wanted to kill Fortunato but in a way that wouldn’t leave blood on his hands, so he cemented him into a small corner of the wine cellar. It was an evil act that displayed the ugly face of revenge.
It begins as the narrator is trying to calm down Usher. He reads a story and similarities begin to take place, “it appeared to me that, from some very remote portion of the mansion, there came, indistinctly, to my ears, what might have been, in its exact similarity of character, the echo (but a stifled and dull one certainly) of the very cracking and ripping sound which Sir Lancelot had so particularly described.” These similarities begin to further unnerve the narrator until he notices Roderick Usher has turned he chair to face the door and is saying nonsense. “We have put her living in the tomb! Said I not that my senses were acute? I now tell you that I heard her first feeble movements in the hollow coffin. I heard them –many, many days ago –yet I dared not –I dared not speak!” It is then that the narrator fully grasps the situation and after Roderick finishes they both look up to see Madeline Usher covered in blood standing in the door way. She attacks her brother in her last struggle and the narrator deathly afraid and paranoid for his sanity flees the house with great haste to watch it fall into the marsh as Usher had predicted with his gloomy sayings. This truly terrifies the narrator and leaves him horrified and truly shaken from what has happened. With this ending
...ows the reader to interpret the end of the story by himself, which brings imagination into the picture. Why does Montresor hesitate in putting up the last stone? This makes the reader wonder if Montresor was beginning to feel guilty. At the end of the story Montresor and Fortunato talk a little. Montresor called aloud, "Fortunato!" No answer came so Montresor states, "I thrust a torch through the remaining aperture and let it fall within. There came forth only a jingling of the bells. My heart grew sick; it was the dampness of the catacombs that made it so"(153). This statement leads the reader to believe that Montresor may have had a moment when his conscience begins to creep up on him. He quickly states that it is the dampness of the catacombs that makes his heart sick.
As the tragedy comes to a close, the truth is revealed to Oedipus concerning his lineage and unnatural actions. Although the truth had been spoken to him about these matters previously, Oedipus had chosen not to believe and understandably so. True revelation comes to Oedipus through the same slave that had been ordered to kill him as a baby.
John Locke is a philosopher who discovered many theories. His philosophy states, “humans begin as blank and gradually acquire knowledge through experience” (Locke). This means that it is the experiences that determine who you are. They can determine if someone is a good person or a bad person. Positive experiences can make someone a good person; bad experiences determine if someone is a bad person, and the same can be said for the monster in Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein.
... shows how truth could come from deceitful actions, however once again demonstrated the tragic end of characters whose death was cause by deception.
Edmund lusted for all of his father’s power, lying to his gullible brother and father aided him in his plan for total authority along with destroying their lives. As bastard son of Gloucester, Edmund wanted to receive all of the power destined for his brother, Edgar, who was Gloucester’s legitimate son. Edmund stated his disapproval of his brother, “Wherefore should I/ Stand in the plague of custom, and permit/ The curiosity of nations to deprive me/ For that I am some twelve or fourteen moonshines/ Lag of a brother? Why bastard?”(1.2.2-6). Edmund wanted the respect and love that Edgar received even though he was Gloucester’s bastard son. He claimed that he was not much younger or “moonshines lag of a brother” therefore he should be considered just as smart and able-minded as any legitimate son. He built up hatred toward Edgar and in order to get rid of him he convinced his father that Edgar had betrayed him through a letter. The letter that Edmund made read, “If our father would sleep till I waked him, you/ should enjoy half his revenue for ever, and live/ the beloved of your brother, Edgar”(1.2.55-57). Edmund portrayed Edgar as the son that would kill Gloucester only to inherit his money and share his inheritance with Edmund. Gloucester believed Edmund, sending out guards to kill Edgar for his betrayal...
Eleanor and Theodora are at each others throats and the end of chapter one, only to be locked arm-in-arm with friendship in the beginning of chapter two. The group as a whole will suffer through a horrifying haunted house experience, only to be laughing and drinking brandy shortly after. But in the end, both the book and the movie excel at establishing a mood and a setting necessary to bring this haunted novel to life. The book does so with its poetic descriptions, tone and character development while the film captures the chilling mood with skillful camera work and brilliant art
...e tension from Ophelias death and the ever-increasing tension and complexity of the plot. It is also an important milestone for Hamlet as he comes in terms with the fact that death is the ultimate equalizer and later in the scene Hamlet imagines how that even Alexander the greats body would of turned into dust, which could have been used to make loam, and that loam could have been used to plug a beer-barrel. This readies Hamlet to die in the final scene, knowing the death is universal, equalizing and more importantly, that everyone dies.