Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical background of psychology
Essays on the history of psychology
Part i origins of psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Medicine has always played a major role in society, but it was not until the early 1900s that mental illnesses were receiving more attention. People began searching for cures and new treatments were starting, or at least being tried. Famous psychiatrist, Walter Freeman, created the first ever lobotomy in the United States. Although he was not the first ever to attempt one, he was the one known for having the best method. The lobotomy is a type of neurosurgery, or surgery performed on the brain, also known as psychosurgery (Freeman). He created his version of the lobotomy in 1936 with his partner James Watts. The medical field marveled at the new procedure and it was not long before Walter Freeman became a household name. After realizing his …show more content…
initial procedure was flawed and could be done better, he created the transorbital lobotomy. The first transorbital lobotomy was performed on January 27, 1946. This occurred in Washington, D.C. in Walter Freeman’s personal office. He believed that mental illnesses were related to overactive emotions, so if he cut pieces of the brain, he would also cut away the feelings that were connected to the illness. Transorbital lobotomies were done by making the patient unconscious by electroshock, he then would take a sharp instrument similar to an ice-pick and would insert it above the patient's eyeball (Walter Freeman). He would go through the orbit of the eye and into the frontal lobes of the brain, moving the instrument back and forth, then repeating it on the other side (Howard Dully’s Journey, 2005). The purpose of the transorbital lobotomy was to attempt to cure people of whatever mental illness they had. Once 1949 hit, transorbital lobotomies became more and more common. It was not too long after that Walter Freeman was performing the operations in all kinds of mental institutions across the entire country. Freeman operated over 2,500 lobotomies on people throughout his life, and he would even perform it on people under the age of eighteen (Walter Freeman). Mental illnesses were the main cause of many problems within families and people themselves. Many procedures resulted in success, but sometimes the result was death. Walter Freeman even thought about moving ahead of the game. Instead of focusing on just mental illnesses, he wondered if he could cure everyday problems like headaches. When Freeman attempted this procedure right away the headaches were gone, but also resulted in a mental state much younger than the person really was. He attempted to transform the transorbital lobotomy to something that could cure just about anything, although it did not really work. In general, there were many cases where one could say lobotomies were a great success, but almost just as often it seemed to ruin a life. Thankfully, recent technology has helped make medicines that can help cure mental illnesses or at the very least relieve some symptoms. As a result, lobotomies are now more of a thing of the past. Although, some still view it as a last ditch effort. One of the more well known cases of the lobotomy is Howard Dully. Dully is in his mid fifties and now lives in California. He was one of Freeman’s youngest patients ever, being operated on just at the age of twelve (Howard Dully’s Journey, 2005). Howard’s mother passed away when he was young so he had to live with his father and stepmother. His step-mother said “he would disobey and was even savage looking”, so she went to Freeman and asked if the lobotomy procedure was right for him. Once the lobotomy was approved it did not really matter, seeing that nothing was wrong with him. Doctors even told her that he was just being an average child. After the procedure Howard remembers always feeling like something is off or like he is missing something. Unfortunately, he has no memory of the lobotomy, so he talked to his father and found out it was just because of his stepmother. I believe majority of the procedures either were beneficial or at least necessary.
There was not much else out there to help, and technically he did cure whatever he was asked to fix, it just had major side effects that could include death. Although, I also think the Howard Dully case was completely ridiculous and a procedure of that magnitude could happen without any kind of testing, background check, or referral from another doctor. While I am against the risk of the lobotomy, I still believe Freeman deserves every bit of credit he got. Although it was very unfortunate that his career came to an end on a bad note, when he lost his medical licenses due to a patient dying while he was operating. Considering he was heading over 2,500 different procedures, it is hard to believe he only messed up once, so that is something that sticks out to …show more content…
me. At the very least, Freeman and his lobotomy definitely opened many different eyes in the medical and psychological fields.
Studies into his procedures and their results helped lead to a whole new understanding of how the brain and its different parts work and can impact a human being. It paved the way for new medicines and technologies that are being used today to help treat people that suffer from many different kinds of mental disorders. I think that is what makes the lobotomy not only necessary, but one of the most influential medical surgeries ever in history. Mental illnesses and the human brain are one of the hardest things for doctors and scientists alike to try and figure out. There are so many different illnesses and even different versions or severities of the same illness. The lobotomy also fixed the problem of the extreme overcrowding on mental institutions. Before people who suffered from mental disorders really had any chance of a cure or treatment, they would all just get thrown into some kind of institution that really did not help at all, it just served as somewhere to put the people. This eventually became a nasty problem due to too many people filling up the institutions and with not even care, workers, or space available. So, whether the outcome was a success or a death, the lobotomy no doubt helped to get people out of institutions. One could also say that the surgery itself helped lead to different surgeries on different body parts more successful. With
so many procedures being performed, it led to more data on how the human body would react to being operated on. Again, overall, I do believe the lobotomy was not only necessary, but extremely beneficial. During its time, the transorbital lobotomy was by default the best. Though, that is only because there really was not too much out there yet to compete with it. The only other thing that was done with people who suffered from mental illnesses or disorders was sending them to a institution. The procedure started off taking a long time and was extremely dangerous, but with Freeman “perfecting” it, it became able to be done in less than fifteen minutes and only more barbaric and dangerous (Hall). Although, this was the only way people felt they could get any kind of relief. Freeman’s lobotomies were also a much cheaper alternative to paying for an institution or the state paying for a patient to be in an asylum (Hall). One could also say a surgery of this type during this time is incredible just in itself. If anything, the transorbital lobotomy gave thousands of people hope who never had any before, and I think that is a main reason as to why the procedure is so important.
Lobotomies were traditionally used to remedy patients with psychological illnesses and behavioral disorders; in the 1950s, they were mainly phased out and substituted with medications, talk therapy, and other methods of dealing. As an overall decree, lobotomies are not carried out today, and many people reason that they are essentially quite brutal. When performed effectively, a lobotomy could bring about significant behavioral modifications for the patient. For psychotic patients, lobotomies were sometimes favorable, relaxing the patient so that he or she could live a somewhat average life. Lobotomies are also notorious for producing a lifeless affect and general reduced responsiveness; this was viewed as an advantage of the lobotomy over all by some supporters of the surgery. Nonetheless, lobotomies can in addition go very wrong. The brain is a tremendously elusive and very intricate organ, and in the era when lobotomies were performed, people were not familiar with much about the brain, as they did not have the assistance of a wide variety of scientific equipment to visualize the brain and its behaviors. At its worst, a lobotomy could be fatal, but it could also cause severe brain damage, ensuing in what was in essence mental retardation of the patient. Patients could also fall into comas and persistent vegetative states after lobotomies. The lobotomy is now thought
Without them, we would be decades behind because the average person would not find signing away a piece of their body acceptable. Skloot brings up a case where a man sues a scientist for doing research on his removed spleen without his consent. The author states that those in favor of research said it “…would ‘create chaos for reseachers’ and ‘[sound] the death kneel to the university physician-scientist’. They called it ‘a threat to the sharing of tissue for research purposes,’ and worried that patients would block the progress of science by holding out for excessive profits, even with cells that weren’t worth millions…” (203). The concern shown from the quote was that with extensive limitations on research and tight ethical codes, the information found would be inadequate at best. On one hand, you do need to be honest with the patient, but for the cost of so many lives, there needs to be a balance of creating breakthroughs and appeasing those who matter in the situation. In regards to Henrietta, she did sign a document to have any medical procedure done that was deemed necessary by her doctors. With that being said, she did unknowingly give away some of her rights as a
Was Charlie better off without the operation? Through Flowers for Algernon, Daniel Keyes sends an crucial message to society that man should never tamper with human intelligence or else the outcome can be personally devastating. After Charlie's operation, he felt isolated and lonesome, change in personality made him edgy around people or (lack social skills), and suffered from traumas due to past memories.
The film gives a historical overview of how the mentally ill have been treated throughout history and chronicles the advancements and missteps the medical community has made along the way. Whittaker recounts the history of psychiatric treatment in America until 1950, he then moves on to describe the use of antipsychotic drugs to treat schizophrenia. He critically summarizes that it is doctors, rather than the patients, who have always calculated the evaluation of the merits of medical treatment, as the “mad” continue to be dismissed as unreliable witnesses. When in fact it is the patient being treated, and their subjective experience, that should be foremost in the evaluation. The film backs up this analysis with interviews of people, living viable lives in the town of Geel, Belgium. I would recommend this film to anyone interested in the history of medicine and specifically to those examining mental illness. It provides a balanced recounting of historical approaches to mental illness, along with success stories of the people of Geel, Belgium. And although I had to look away during the viewing of a lobotomy procedure, I give credit to the power of the visual impact the footage
One of the most famous forms of a cure during the 1930s was a surgery called Lobotomy. “Lobotomy, also known as leucotomy which mean cut/slice white in Greek, or its nickname of ice pick, is a neurosurgical operation that involves severing connection in the brain’s prefrontal lobe” according to Freeman. Lobotomy was performed by
Szasz, Thomas. Coercion as Cure: A Critical History of Psychiatry. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction, 2007. Print. Braslow, Joel T. Mental Ills and Bodily Cures: Psychiatric Treatment in the First Half of the Twentieth Century. California: University of California, 1997. Print.
Charlie?s experiment was temporary, and overtime his IQ regressed. Algernon, a mouse that went through the same surgery as Charlie, died. If Charlie?s hypothesis proves correct, then he will die as well. Charlie?s life was better before the experiment because he was not exposed to the risks and consequences of the surgery. Without the experiment, Charlie would still be living his ignorant but happy life.
The term used to describe this surgical procedure is trepanning or trephination. It has also been referred to burr holing. Trepanning is hought to be the oldest surgical procedure performed that can be validated by archaeologists. (1) It is also thought to be the first attempt to reign in unruly or deviant behaviors. Mental illness was an unknown in this era. The prevailing thought of the time was that these individuals were ruled by evil spirits. Hippocrates endorsed trepanning, writing explicit instructions in how to perform the surgery.
A large concern of the field of neurobiology seems to be finding and understanding a connection between the structure and function of the nervous system. What tangible system of tissues is responsible for creating a given perceived output? Some outputs can be more easily traced back to a specific 'motor symphony' and the involved structures isolated. This problem has obsessed generations of scientists. One of the first of this generation of researcher was F.J. Gall who promoted the idea that observable features of the brain could lead to an understanding of specific traits of action (7). Gall's greatest opponent, Marie-Jean-Pierre Flourens published research on localization of function and among his findings was evidence for sensory perception in certain sub-cortical structures (7). However, when Flourens examined the cerebrum he did not get such clean results. He found that damage to the cerebrum would not compromise specific abilities in the patient based on area, but incapacitate the patient in different ways based on the extent of the created lesion. In other words, damage to the cerebrum effected a diminution of 'higher mental faculties' such as "perception intellect and will" according to how great the lesion actually was, not according to where in the hemispheres it occurred (7). His conclusion proposed these higher mental faculties as existing throughout the structures of the cerebrum, and not isolated as with sensory perception. How is it possible to attribute, say elements of personality to a specific structure? Is their a region of the brain responsible for the way we are? A 'nice' region, an 'angry' gland? Here we encounter the ever ephemeral concept of where the I-function lies within the nervous system.
In the late eighteenth century, the moral treatment was first adopted by Dr. Willis and then popularized by French physician Philippe Pinel and British philanthropist William Tuke. Discouraged by the inefficiency of traditional treatments and inspired by the Enlightenment principle, these innovators tried to find a new approach to help psychotics back to sanity. Because the principle and practices of moral treatment place a high value on respecting the liberty, humanity, and individuality of patients, the moral treatment achieved the success in curing patients and remained popular in the next century.
The early history of mental illness is bleak. The belief that anyone with a mental illness was possessed by a demon or the family was being given a spiritual was the reason behind the horrific treatment of those with mental illness. These individuals were placed into institutions that were unhygienic and typically were kept in dark, cave like rooms away from people in the outside world. The institutions were not only dark and gross; they also used inhumane forms of treatment on their patients. Kimberly Leupo, discusses some of the practices that were used, these included may types of electro shocks, submitting patients to ice bath, as well as many other horrific events (Leupo). Lobotomies, which are surgical procedures that cut and scrape different connections in the brain, were very common practice. They were thought to help cure mental illness, but often ended up with more damage than good.
The treatment involved passing electrical currents through the brain which would trigger a small seizure and ease the symptoms of certain mental illnesses, however the procedure was used without anesthesia and caused the patient to jerk uncontrollably, this treatment would sometimes result in fractures, memory loss, and other side effects. The treatment is still used today, although with much weaker currents and anesthesia. Another popular treatment used in the asylums was the injection of insulin into a patient to induce a coma. This treatment was thought to reset an individual’s brain and bring them back to “normal”, however, insulin coma therapy proved to be not very effective and was phased out in the 1960s. One of the most inhumane treatments for the mentally ill was the lobotomy, or the prefrontal leucotomy. This surgical procedure involved opening a hole in the head to sever nerve pathways in the prefrontal cortex. The lobotomy was performed at least 15,000 times in Britain before being phased out in the late 1950s. Another type of brain surgery discussed in the film, was one done on patient, Maggi Chapman, who underwent a surgery in which an electrode was attached to a part of her brain and then turned on to fry that part of the brain. Maggi goes on to describe how the next few years she felt like a zombie and had a difficult time going through life (BBC,
Danvers, an insane asylum in Boston, Massachusetts was the rumored birthplace of the procedure known as lobotomy (Taylor). Dr. Walter Freeman studied lobotomy, and he was the first to practice the procedure. Lobotomy began with electric shock to the forehead. Then the eye lids were folded back and an ice pick was used to sever the frontal lobes. The patient would have black eyes after this awful procedure. This was supposed to cure an insane person (“YouTube”).
Mental illness, today we are surround by a broad array of types of mental illnesses and new discoveries in this field every day. Up till the mid 1800’s there was no speak of personality disorder, in fact there was only two type of mental illness recognized. Those two illnesses as defined by Dr. Sam Vaknin (2010), “”delirium” or “manial”- were depression (melancholy), psychoses, and delusions.” It was later in 1835 when J. C. Pritchard the British Physician working at Bristol Infirmary Hospital published his work titled “Treatise on Insanity and Other Disorder of the Mind” this opened the door to the world of personality disorder. There were many story and changes to his theories and mental illness and it was then when Henry Maudsley in 1885 put theses theories to work and applied to a patient. This form of mental illness has since grown into the many different types of personality disorder that we know today. Like the evolution of the illness itself there has been a significant change in the way this illness is diagnosed and treated.
money, and not do medical research- which is what he really wanted to do. The