The Lisbon Earthquake

651 Words2 Pages

The Lisbon Earthquake of 1755 devastated the Portuguese city, decimating it to ruins with a total death toll rumored to be around 30,000-60,000. Following the quake, tsunami waves crashed over the city. Fires broke out and spread throughout the city as well. The mass destruction disrupted common Enlightenment ideologies of the time. Popular philosophers of pre earthquake Europe such as Isaac Newton, Leibniz, and Alexander Pope, argued that we live in the best of possible worlds. Their “whatever is, is right” maxim represented the optimistic themes that were characteristic of early 18th century thought (Fleming). Prior to the earthquake, Lisbon was heavily catholic centralized. The devastating day fell on All Saints day when most of the population …show more content…

Leibniz was a critical philosopher in spreading this ideal throughout the Enlightenment. His work “Theodicee” discusses the concept of a good world, “indeed the best of possible worlds, chosen by an all-wise, all-good creator” (Brightman). His ideas on suffering and evil reinforce the initial popular response to the earthquake, that “God sends us unhappiness, as a result of original sin our vices surpass our virtues, and ‘a single Caligula, a Nero has done more [evil] than an earthquake.’” (Brightman). He believed that individual lives lost were for the good of the universe, that God did not see individual lives but the benefit of the whole universe, and therefore, there is more good in the universe. Pope carries this ideal on, developing the idea the “whatever is, is right” (Brightman). In his poem, Essay on Man, Pope reaffirms Leibnitz’s claim that nature’s evil, as well as the evil of man, “do not undercut the notion of a reasonable God,” (Dynes). Rousseau sums this optimistic philosophy up as the most critical optimistic philosopher of the enlightenment. His work, Discourse of the Science and Arts, veered away from the more popular of enlightenment ideals by denigrating science as “deletrious, since [it] took people farther away from their natural innocence and …show more content…

Voltaire was not widely received prior to the Lisbon earthquake. He often found himself butting heads with the Church, government, and intellectual establishments. This caused him to publish works anonymously and he was also denied authorship quite often (Dynes). Voltaire did, however, relish in this “intellectual combat” and “used wit to make his points” (Dynes). His established writing is what eventually carried him to fame following the Lisbon earthquake. Voltaire was writing against his time, too radical for the enlightenment. However, the public just needed a shock to reevaluate their ideology. The Lisbon Earthquake provided Voltaire the perfect platform to deliver his message to a newly receiving audience. They’re ideas were shattered and they were perfectuly vulnerable to be seduced by a witty and charasimatic writer such as Voltaire. Perfect

Open Document