The Line Between Sex-Work And Human Trafficking

898 Words2 Pages

Sex-work is viewed to be a disgraceful and morally unacceptable act, stemming from the cultural and historical stigma that exists in regard to sexual expression. Similarly, many still argue that a woman’s sexuality is morally wrong, completely disregarding male sex-workers and increasing the negative view against sexual liberation. More so, sex work as a business in a regulated and controlled environment differs completely from the view many western cultures hold; sex-work as a form of oppression. However, this is referred to as human trafficking and creates confusion when discussing sex-work. The line between sex-work and human trafficking is blurred; yet, sex-work as a business is not so much a discussion of morals, but of the way people …show more content…

Yet the social and legal prohibition of sex work is what creates the risk within the business. Sex-workers are perceived as people in dire situations, which can be applied to many cases, however, within regulated environments, which provide safety, health care, and support; the act of sex-work is representative of a business rather than a form of immorality. There is the discussion that sex-work evokes a sense of lust and that is “the bondage of the soul to the forces of darkness,” (Blackburn 2004, p.54) a religious basis towards ones expression of their sexual identity. There is a strong antagonism towards namely, woman’s sexuality, in the patriarchal religious view, perceiving them as innately debase and sinful; educating many that the act of sexual pleasure is morally wrong. These principles are still embedded within modern societal discussion, and while not entirely linked to religion, reflects the degrading image of sexual expression, inhibiting the chance of boarder views of sex-work. This limited notion of sex-work limits the general ideas of sex-work and further acts to affirm the negative stigma that surrounds …show more content…

This approach to the sex-work argument is problematical as it reflects the mainstream view that disregards other genders that may be involved in sex-work; “prostitutes must be defined as women.” Likewise, they suggest that sex-work “exists to meet the desire of men to degrade women,” further inhibiting the difference between forced sexual labor and sex-work as a force of sexual and sexuality liberation and freedom. Radical feminists believe hat sex should be “free of economic coercion” and act the “eliminate prostitution in all forms,” there by denying the possibility of sexual freedom. Sex-work is viewed here as not only the selling of one’s sexuality, but also of themselves; arguing that there is no form of morals when it comes to sex-work, actively denying the right of individuals to choose their own decisions. Sex-work, however, in supportive conditions, would allow for more freedom in regards to choice and control. Thus, while aspects of sex-work in many cultures are seen as degrading and harmful, the problem does not lie within the act of sexual identity, but rather the conditions that surround it; taking pleasure in sex is not morally impermissible it occurs within many different forms of relationships (e.g. marriage, casual sex, friends with benefits), nor is using sexual encounters

Open Document