Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Types of crime cjs 231 essay
Lindbergh kidnapping
Lindbergh kidnapping
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On the evening of March 1st, 1932, famous aviator Charles Lindbergh and his wife, Anne Morrow Lindbergh put their 20 month old baby, Charles “Charlie” Augustus Lindbergh Jr to bed on the second floor of the Lindbergh home near Hopewell, New Jersey. When the child’s nurse, Betty Gow, went to check on Charlie, he was gone. Gow then reported the child’s absence to his parents. The police were contacted immediately and the search for the baby began. While trying to get in touch with the suspect who was leaving handwritten notes, the Lindbergh’s were very close to receiving their precious child. On May 12th, 1932, 72 days after the kidnapping, a decomposed body of a baby was found in the woods near the Lindbergh house. The child was dead and was predicted to have died on the night of the kidnapping as a result of a fractured skull. Charles Lindbergh was able to identify the baby as his own. Now the kidnapping had also become an immoral murder. Bruno Hauptmann is proven guilty through physical evidence, some which is found at the crime scene, his own physical features, and his handwriting. Additionally, his residency and money, specifically gold certificates assist in determining his innocence. Lastly, the testimonies at Hauptmann’s trial lead to one clear statement at last. Through an examination of physical evidence and case details, it can be concluded that Bruno Richard Hauptmann was responsible for the kidnapping of Charles Augustus Lindbergh.
The most crucial evidence found to help in investigating is at the crime scene. Numerous fragments are exposed to prove Bruno Richard Hauptmann as guilty. One of the many pieces of evidence used against Hauptmann was a ladder that was left at the crime scene. As one of the investigators p...
... middle of paper ...
...1935, Hauptmann was convicted and sentenced to death by Judge Trenchard.
Works Cited
Levy, Barry. “Cracking The Lindbergh Kidnapping Case. (Cover Story).” American History 40.2 (2005): 32. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 28 Oct. 2013.
Linder, Douglas. “The Trial of Richard "Bruno" Hauptmann: An Account.” UMKC School of Law.
Douglas Linder, 2005. Web. 1 Nov. 2013.
Linder, Douglas. “The Trial of Bruno Hauptmann.” Jurist Law. Jurist, 2002. Web. 6 Nov. 2013. Oxford, Edward. "The Other Trial Of The Century." American History 30.3 (1995):
18. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 7 Nov. 2013.
Scott Berg, A. Lindbergh. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1998. Print.
Sellers, Clark. “Handwriting Evidence Against Hauptmann.” Scholarly Commons. Northwestern
University School of Law (1937): 882. Web. 1 Nov. 2013.
Zorn, Robert. Cemetry John. New York: The Overlook Press, 2012. Print.
The 20 month old baby, Charles Lindbergh Jr., was murdered on the day of March 1, 1932. He had just been put to sleep by his nurse, who was the last person to see the youngest child alive, when he was taken from his crib in the nursery on the second floor (“Lindbergh Kidnapping”). His body was accidentally found on May 12, 1932, half buried in the woods, 45 feet from a highway. The body’s location was only four and a half miles away from the Lindbergh estate. When Lindbergh Jr.’s body was found, his head was smashed, his skull had a
Abadinsky, Howard. Law and Justice: An Introduction to the American Legal System. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2008. Print.
Martin, Harold. “The Trial of ‘Delay’ Beckwith.” The Saturday Evening Post 237, no. 10, (March 14, 1964):77-81.
Following the scandal involving the kidnapping and subsequent death of his child, Lindbergh had once again been shoved into the American limelight. During the thirties
Sue Grafton once stated: “Except for cases that clearly involve a homicidal maniac, the police like to believe murders are committed by those we know and love, and most of the time they're right.” This is clearly the thought the Boulder Colorado police conceived in the case of little beauty queen JonBenet Ramsey. As many have observed from the onslaught of media coverage, the day after Christmas 1996, six year old Jon Benet Ramsey was found buried under a white blanket, bound, beaten, and strangled to death in the wine cellar of their Boulder home. With such a strikingly rare and glamorous story of a six year old beauty queen dead, who was a part of a “perfect American upper-middle class family”, combined with a lack of a lead and ever mounting suspicion piling up against the parents it was no surprise to find that it was fuel to the media and soon stories sold and became a matter of competition between the press. So, like wildfire, this heart-breaking story spread, stretching across the nation, shattering the souls of the world. News broadcasts, magazine and newspaper articles, and television specials all shaped and molded peoples perceptions of this beautiful child’s murder, especially her parents, John and Pasty Ramsey’s involvement or lack there of. The police and FBI’s merciless quest to connect Jon Benet’s murder to her parents, seemed to cause the them to overlook important evidence, or at the very least dismiss suspicious findings that would otherwise send red flags to investigators. There are many contributors as to why this case remains unsolved including lack of investigative expertise, failure to protect valuable evidence, and focusing too much on the parents as suspects but, ultimately, the over involvement of...
Gehrke, R. (2000, September 3). A wrong turn led to Bundy's twisted road to justice. Los Angeles Times, p. 2.
Altogether, sixteen document examiners had either testified or were willing to testify against Hauptmann. The Lindbergh kidnapping is historic in the fact that virtually every handwriting expert, at the time, had weighed in with the prosecution. Some of the examiners included: Albert S. Osborn, Albert D. Osborn, Elbridge W. Stein, and John E Tyrrell. With the review of the ransom notes, this case proved exactly how important questioned documents can be to a case. Without the help of Albert S. Osborn, and the other handwriting experts, who knows how the case would have concluded. The Lindbergh case also changed how we look at forensic botany since there was no soil collection of where the body was found. The identification of the wood used, the physical marks left by tools on the wood, and comparisons of the wood structure were also key components to the further development of forensic botany. On February 11, 1935 Hauptmann was found guilty of murder and was sentenced to death. Hauptmann died in the electric chair on April 3, 1936. At the time of the sentencing, virtually no one considered Hauptmann to be innocent. In the aftermath of the crime, the most notorious of the 1930s, kidnapping was made a federal
On a hot morning on august 4, 1892, Mr. Andrew Borden and his wife, Abby Borden, were brutally murdered. A daughter of the victims, Lizzie Borden was arrested, tried and acquitted of the crime. “ She was a woman of spotless character and reputation, and more than that she was educated, refined and prominently connected with the work of the Christian church in the Fall River”(Gates 2).The town and the country were divided in their opinions of who could commit such horrifying murders. Many theories have been made to explain that day; the finger has been pointed in every direction- even a Chinese Sunday school student of Lizzies. To this day people are unsure as to weather or not Lizzie brutally murdered her parents.
The aim of this paper is study the same primary sources that other historians have studied and see what conclusions if any can be drawn from them. The primary sources that will be used in this paper include but are not limited to online transcripts of the trial records, and other material written by the many historians of the years.
Gordon, Ann D. “The Trial of Susan B. Anthony”. Federal Judicial Center, Federal Judicial History Office, 2005.
Morgenstern, Julian. “Trial By Ordeal Among the Semites and in Ancient Israel.” Hebrew Union College Annual. Vol. II, (1925).
The relationship between law enforcement and prosecutors, which goes hand-in-hand, can’t be overlooked. Evidence of a crime that detectives and law enforcement discover is as equally important as a good trial on part of the prosecution. If detectives aren’t able to find good solid evidence – that case usually isn’t bothered in being pursued. Several years ago, in the late 80’s, there was a murder case in Southeastern Oklahoma which now serves as a tragic example to the need for honest, constitutional work in the criminal justice system. Disreputable investigative procedures, fraudulent sources, and bad evidence were the foundation of this case that shattered innocent lives.
Berns, Walter. "Getting Away With Murder." Commentary 97.4 (1994): 25. MAS Ultra - School Edition. Web. 14
Some time in July of 1947, a mysterious flying object zigzagged across the skies of New Mexico. Within twenty-four hours the object disappeared from radar just as mysteriously as it had appeared. It was last seen in a small town in the middle of the Arizona desert, it’s name, Roswell.
Lee, Henry Dr and Dr. Jerry Labriola. Famous Crimes Revisited. Strong Books, Southington, CT. 2001.