The Life and Works of Bertolt Brecht
In this essay I will consider the life and works of Bertolt Brecht,
the famous theatre practitioner who has had such a dramatic impact on
our understanding of the theatre and acting. First of all I will give
a biography of Brecht because it is important to know the background
of his life in order to understand the motives he had for writing and
producing plays in the way he did. We will see a direct correlation
between events in his life and the plays and techniques that he
propagated. I will then move to explore the methods and techniques
that Brecht developed, looking at how they came about and who
influenced his work. I will look at Brecht’s theory of Epic theatre,
tracing the beginnings of this style and looking at the influences
that may have helped to form it. To get a clear view of what Epic
theatre is like I will compare it to dramatic theatre, which Brecht
did himself, in regard to how the audience reacts to it. I will
examine Brecht’s theory of using Montage and the effect that he
intended to have on the audience. I will consider the origination of
Verfremdungseffekt and how this was not an original idea of Brecht’s
but something that he identified with because it supported his ideas.
Geste was the technique that Brecht wanted actors to use when
portraying a character, I will examine what geste is and what may have
influenced Brecht to use it. Music for Brecht was a vital part of
theatre and I will look at what interested him about using music and
the role of music in his Epic theatre. I will consider Brecht’s ideas
of what stage design should be like and how he viewed it as something
separate to the text and the music. Brecht was a political writer and
after reading the works of Karl Marx he wrote and produced didactic
plays that reflected the philosophy of communism. Brecht wanted to
involve the audience in the debates that he presented in the text and
in this way the audience would learn about the arguments and be able
to come to an informed conclusion of what they thought. The plays that
did this are called ‘The Lehrstuck’ or ‘Learning Plays’ and I will
consider how they were presented in order to involve the audience and
get them to respond.
Brecht was born in 1898 to a middle class family in the south of
Germany. In his teenage years the First World War broke out and ...
... middle of paper ...
... was so
against. In the writings of Karl Marx he found a philosophy that
mirrored his and he began to write more vigorously to inspire
political change. His belief was that the oppressed poor people had to
be inspired to fight for political change and thereby relieve their
suffering. These plays were written for a music festival and they took
place on a very open stage, which allowed more audience involvement.
Behind the stage there was a projection screen which displayed the
text and invited the audience to join in by singing along. Sometimes
there would be actors in the audience to lead the audience response.
In this way Brecht hoped to involve the audience in the political
debates within the text.
Throughout his life Brecht collaborated with other writers, musicians,
directors and designers. His work was always an amalgamation of
efforts and yet he managed to claim it as his own. By the end of his
life he was a leading figure in theatre his productions had changed
the way people viewed theatre because of their innovative ideas and
detailed acting and design. Through exploring Brecht’s work I have
learnt more about the theatre, its origins and its potential.
Ralph shows that he has a better understanding of the boys than Jack. He knows that the boys need some sort of order on the island in order for them to survive. He starts a simple form of government and sets a few rules for them. Even though they don’t last very long, the fact that he tried to help the group is what makes him a better leader. Ralph’s wisdom and ability to look toward the future also has an advantage over Jack. He has a sense to keep his focus on getting off the island. When the fire goes out, Ralph gets upset because the chance to be rescued was gone as well. Ralph enforces his role of leadership as he gives the boys a sense of stability of an authority figure. He keeps the boys in pretty good order at the meeting by making a rule that they can only speak if they have the conch. Ralph knows that the littleuns are afraid and they need shelter to feel more secure. They work together for a while, but as the time goes on the smaller boys want to go play. They slowly lose all their help until Simon and Ralph are the only ones left to work on them. Ralph knows that this is a necessity and keeps bringing it up at the meetings. Jack, on the other hand, is doing nothing but causing chaos.
Hostile demand is not what makes a great leader. Jack doesn't understand priority, and it's seen in chapter four after a ship passes the island and there is no fire to create smoke as a signal. Ralph says, “You let the fire go out.” (Golding 80). Jack's unprioritized guilty mind is noticed here in this quote, “He flushed, conscious of a fault. "The fire's only been out an hour or two. We can light up again--" He noticed Ralph's scarred nakedness, and the sombre silence of all four of them” (Golding 81). This is why it's unreasonable to say that Jack would be a better leader. He is unable to prioritize the needs of their society and of his peers because he doesn't fully understand what it means to be a leader and look at the bigger picture. Jack is the definition of chaos, and with him as a leader, the society would deteriorate quickly without the proper structure that Ralph
I wouldn’t follow Jack as a leader because he was selfish and violent. He would lash out on Piggy and others for the littlest reason. Jack was more focused on hunting and killing more than looking out for the boys and making sure they had a place to keep safe. He also didn’t care about the signal fire which could have saved him from the island, he was more focused on hunting and killing. Jack doesn’t care about other people’s feelings and he was the reason for Simon’s death and didn’t even feel bad for doing so. He only cared that he “killed the beast”, why have leader who cares more about killing than the people he’s leading? I personally have known someone who started out as a good person but once they started getting more popular and when they started to get a high position, they started letting the power get to their head and became really mean. They also started to become a straight bully and bully anybody who wasn’t as “good” as them. Just like Jack, letting the power get to his
The works of James Baldwin are directly related to the issues of racism, religion and personal conflicts, and sexuality and masculinity during Baldwin's years.James Baldwin's works, both fiction and nonfiction were in some instance a direct reflection his life. Through close interpretation you can combine his work to give a "detailed" look into his actual life. However since most writings made by him are all considered true works of literature we can't consider them to be of autobiographical nature.
Hamlet the Play and the Movie Hamlet by William Shakespeare is a story about a king that was murdered by his brother and the prince has been asked by his father?s ghost to avenge his murder. The original story line has been altered a few times since it has been written. The original Hamlet the play and the altered Hamlet the movie are shown differently in many different ways. Hamlet the movie with Mel Gibson shows different things than the play, but there are three major differences between the two. The three major differences are in the way both of the productions start out, differences in the scene that the players put on a play, and differences in the way the productions end.
Humor was added to Hamlet by two major scenes, along with Hamlet's use of his antic-disposition. These two were: the scene between Hamlet and Polonius in the library, and the scene with the grave diggers (the clowns).
A few positive leadership qualities Jack possesses are qualities such as bravery, authoritativeness and dedication. Jack illustrates bravery when he grabs a hold of the boar and risks getting wounded. The dedication Jack exhibits is apparent throughout the novel by the way he dedicates his time to finding meat for the helpless boys. Lastly, Jack's authoritativeness is depicted when the boys and littuns all obey his orders. Jack's authoritativeness is apparent when he says “Go on!” and the two savages respond together by saying “The chief has spoken” (155). These lines demonstrate that the two savages think highly of Jack and respect his authority. To conclude, Jack Merridew possesses many positive leadership qualities that would make him an effective leader of the group of lost and scared boys.
In the year 1970, the Canadian government founded the Law Reform Commission of Canada to ensure the progression of law making and to make recommendations for legal changes . The Law Reform Commission of Canada is constantly importing and suggesting proposals towards the criminal code of Canada. During the year of 1985, t...
won millions to his cause. Even though he said that at his death he was "...the
...experience, but rather was able to create a unique and equally admirable one of his own.
such a hunger for power and wealth he doesn't want to share it. This is why he has his own
Modernism gained form circa 1850, it proposed “new forms of art on the grounds that these were more appropriate to the (present) time. It is therefore characterised by constant innovation and a rejection of conservative values such as the realistic depiction of the world. This has led to experiments with form and to an emphasis on processes and materials. (TATE.org.uk, assessed 27 Oct 2014)
How does the use of comic relief best contrast the tragedy of Hamlet? In great works of literature a comic relief is used as contrast to a serious scene to intensify the overall tragic nature of the play or to relieve tension. As illustrated in Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, intense scenes are joined with character’s banter and vacuous actions as to add a comic relief. In Hamlet, Polonius acts as a comic relief by his dull and windy personality, Hamlet uses his intelligence and his negativity toward the king and queen to create humor, while on the other hand Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are a comic relief by their senseless actions and naïve natures. Polonius, Hamlet, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are all used as a comic relief to increase the ultimate tragic nature of the play.
As often associated with a tragedy, a conflict usually ensues between a protagonist and another force in the play. A tragedy is ‘a serious drama typically describing a conflict between the protagonist and a superior force and having a sorrowful or disastrous conclusion that elicits pity or terror’ (Webster's dictionary). Given its structure and depth in characterization, this play will or can be analyzed and interpreted from various perspectives and beliefs. However, my analysis of the play is conducted on the basis of various components which are: Hamlet as a tragic hero, the ironic message conveyed in the play, the roles of its characters, the role and personification of madness, the role of paranormality, the role of friends and family, the role of inaction, the role of sex and violence, and the role of death as portrayed in the play. Based on literary definitions and portrayal of his character, there is popular belief that Hamlet as the protagonist acted to satisfy his own conscience but could his actions be attributed purely to his desire or was he being influenced by other factors?
Shakespeare's comedies can be recognized in terms of plot, structure and characters. We can see that Shakespearean comedies follow the same structural pattern, a basic plot on which the play is based. For example, a key feature of all comedies is that they depend upon the resolution of their plots. However, Shakespeare's comedies are distinguishable, as some are classed as comic dramas and others as romantic comedies. In comic drama, there is usually a motif of a place where reality and the unreal merge, the roles of characters are reversed and identities are mistaken or lost. This place may take on the form of a feast or celebration, or it may be presented as a place segregated from the normal society, such as the wood in A Midsummer Night's Dream. When scenes are set in this place, the ordinary rules of life and society do not apply. There is always an experience of chaos, which must be resolved in order for the play to become a true comedy.