Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The difference between novel and movie
The difference between novel and movie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Writers often change specific literary components when creating a film of a book or short story. While many literary components are kept in a story, director have often chosen to change some components to add a specific element to the story. Through analyzing the literary components of setting, plot and the use of characters in the stories of Sleepy Hollow, Rappaccini’s Daughter and The Jilting of Granny Weatherall, the writer can better determine and understand the differences of the short stories and the film versions.
The most noticeable literary component to compare is the plot. Throughout all three stories there are changes made that add a different element to the version of the author's or director's version. In “The Legend of Sleepy
…show more content…
Hollow,” the director of the film decided to make many changes that greatly affected the feel of the story. In the short story, Ichabod Crane is disappears after being taken by the horseman. In the film, the author decides to have Crane attacked by a fake horseman and passing out instead. This is just a change to add a suspense element to the movie. Also, in the short story, the horseman had his head taken off with a cannon ball. In the movie, his head is cut off. There are also many comparisons in plot of “Rappaccini's Daughter.” When Giovanni looks into the garden, the father does not address him when he is in the window. Also, when she plucks the flower in the short story, there is a lizard that dies at her feet. In the movie, it is a butterfly. Much of the rest of the story in “Rappaccini’s Daughter” is kept the same through the choice of the director. Much of the story is also changed in “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall.” The entire story is told from a different point of view is the short story compared to the movie. The short story is told from the point of view of her recalling events that have already happened. In the movie, you actually see everything happening in real time. Also, he doesn’t want her daughter to know about the letters written to her in the short story, while in the movie, her daughter reads the letters with her. The rest of the story is kept mainly the same. Another element that is often changed when film version of short stories or books are made are the characters.
Characters are considered one of the most important elements in the development of a story. The most obvious in the three stories is in “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow.” The director of the film made many changes to the character of Ichabod Crane to enhance his plot. In the short story, Ichabod Crane is a school teacher while in the film, he is a lawman from New York. This was used by the director simply to change and enhance the story he was attempting to portray. In the remaining stories, “Rappaccini’s Daughter” and “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall,” the directors kept the character very similar to those portray in the short stories. This could be for a number of reasons for the directors choosing the keep the characters similar, but it mainly goes back to how they portrayed the plots. The directors of the two films kept the plots of the book in the films, which translated to the similar characters. This is done because the characters are central to the plot of the short stories. If the films had the same plot, but different characters, it would not have the same effect. This also keeps the film adaptations close to the short stories. This can be good for the reader, but stories and books do not always translate to the big …show more content…
screen. Setting is the final element of comparison is also a major one in terms of how a story is presented and developed.
In “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow,” there is another noticeable difference between the short story in the film. The short story takes place in a town called Tarry Town. This is a small, secluded place in a glen that is called Sleepy Hollow. In the film, the main town in the story is actually called Sleepy Hollow. The author chose this to add to his plot. Many things were changed from the short story to create the film, and the alteration to have the plot take place in the town of Sleepy Hollow was better for the storyline of the director. This also makes the story better for the reader. “Sleepy Hollow” is a sinister, spooky name that adds a great effect on a reader’s experience. In “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” everything in the setting is basically kept the same. This is done because the director made the film very true to the film. The short story and the film both take place in Southern Italy. This keeps the very same feel across both of the adaptations. In “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall,” the major change to the setting of the story also goes with the change in plot. The way the story is presented in the short story is inside of Granny Weatherall’s head. She is having dreams and flashbacks that are used to develop the story. In the film, the story is told from more of a third person perspective. The film also incorporates the use of the dreams and flashbacks
as a way of keeping the same feel of the short story. The director does this to better enhance the story to be used in a film. The limitations of filming present challenges in capturing a story written like that. The reader also loses out of an element of the story from this. The way the short story is written inside of her head is a brilliant way to show the development of the character and the way Granny Weatherall was haunted by this man.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Many time in our lives, we have seen the transformation of novels into movies. Some of them are equal to the novel, few are superior, and most are inferior. Why is this? Why is it that a story that was surely to be one of the best written stories ever, could turn out to be Hollywood flops? One reason is that in many transformations, the main characters are changed, some the way they look, others the way they act. On top of this, scenes are cut out and plot is even changed. In this essay, I will discuss some of the changes made to the characters of the Maltese Falcon as they make their transformation to the ?big screen.?
A Comparison A Sound of Thunder by Ray Bradbury and The Star by H.G. Wells
Some of the characters in the novel, like Lennie, are portrayed differently in the movie. In the novel, Lennie is said to be “a huge man” (2), but in the movie he isn’t very big, although he is bigger than George and some of the other characters. In the movie he is stronger and bigger than the others, but not to the extreme amount that the book portrays him to be. Also, Lennie is depicted as very mentally challenged, which is shown by the way he speaks. Whereas in the book, Lennie is said to have a mind of a young child instead of being disabled. As well as Lennie, Curley’s wife is represented a little bit differently. In the movie,...
Many evenings during the winter, Ichabod spent with the old Dutch wives. They would tell ghost stories as well as other super natural beings and demons while sitting by the fire. There was a certain story that was never left out, the legendary Headless Horseman, or sometimes known as the Hessian of the Hollow. The story went on that there was a soldier who with a cannon ball had gotten his head shot off and since roamed through Sleepy Hollow looking for his lost head while on his horse. The Headless Horseman has a jack-o-lantern that sits in replacement of his head. In addition, a love story is part of “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” however many find it to be more of a pure lust or greed story. There was girl named Katrina Van Tassel who was
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
When novels are adapted for the cinema, directors and writers frequently make changes in the plot, setting, characterization and themes of the novel. Sometimes the changes are made in adaptations due to the distinctive interpretations of the novel, which involve personal views of the book and choices of elements to retain, reproduce, change or leave out. On the contrary, a film is not just an illustrated version of the novel; it is a totally different medium. When adapting the novel, the director has to leave out a number of things for the simple reason of time difference. Furthermore, other structures and techniques must be added to the film to enhance the beauty and impressions of it. Like a translator, the director wants to do some sort of fidelity to the original work and also create a new work of art in a different medium. Regardless of the differences in the two media, they also share a number of elements: they each tell stories about characters.
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
Films of this era are criticized for substituting violence and special effects for "substance". Many believe that creating a movie script is a juvenile form of writing, a shrub to the oak of a novel. Upon reading both the novel The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne and viewing the film produced by Roland Joffe, one notices the tremendous effort put into both. This essay will explore the many differences and similarities between the book and movie.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
Although at times it is easy to get carried away with the adventure of a story, noticing the elements a writer has put into his work is very important. In reading “Young Goodman Brown” and “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” you can see both similarities as well as differences of how both Nathaniel Hawthorne and Washington Irving chose to illuminate their romantic writing styles. The writers both use a mystical woodsy setting with supernatural twists to draw in readers. Underlying you will find the differing romantic themes each writer used, as well as how each writer chose to end their work.
It’s pretty clear that film and literature are very different mediums and when you try to make one into the other, such as an adaptation, you’re going to have some things that are lost in translation and seen in a different light. When an original work is made into a movie, I think they’re kind of at a disadvantage because they only have a few hours to get the whole story across while also keeping the viewer intrigued by what is taking place on the screen right in front of their eyes. Movies are able to contain special effects, visuals, and music though which can impact a viewer and make a scene stay in their mind longer which is a plus side to being able to view something. Literature on the other hand, has a greater advantage. They can keep the reader entertained for a considerably long time and you’re able to get more information about people and events such as what a character is thinking or what is happening behind the scenes during a specific event. I understand that people are going to have different opinions when it comes to whether a book or film adaptation of a work is the best and it is not always going to be the same for each and every piece of work. One thing I think though, is that The Namesake in both the film and the movie, they’re both accurate and concise in the way that they relate to one another.
In addition, the two express similarities through the narrators. The narrators are mentioned in the stories though, they are not the main characters. Having the narrators be others than the main character is a benefit to the overall idea. This is because it has a perspective that allows the readers to form their own opinions, without the influence of one or the other. The next major key point would be the idea of symbolism. Symbolism has a strong meaning that drives the book in a way that shows the underlying meaning of the novels. This is important for the reason being, in the end it can explain the overall meaning that makes the book complete. The next one goes along with the one previously mentioned-love. Love is what keeps the books alive. With any book that was written there is always some form of love. The authors keep this particular format because it shows the emotions that humans have for one another. Death is more than just a saying in the books. Death plays a crucial role when explaining the catastrophes the occurs throughout the duration of the novels. Death is something that has to occur in order for the
As stated numerous times throughout this essay, movies must stay true to their book predecessor for full effect. Books are normally beautifully described and written, and help the reader visualize a completely new world. Most movies, not just The Book Thief, normally omit several