Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast between capitalism and socialism
Trade unions modern studies
Socialism vs capitalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Labour Party
The Labour Party has traditionally believed in Socialism, and
therefore they reject capitalist ideas and values, believing that
Capitalism produces huge wealth for some, and relative poverty for
many others. They rejected the idea of revolution, like the
Conservative party, preferring evolution, but remains committed to
achieving social goals associated with fairness, justice, and
equality.
Clause 4 of the 1918 Labour Party Constitution committed the party to
support the nationalisation of industry to provide the workers with
the 'fruit' of their labour, rather than the private ownership of
industry for private profit.
Traditionally, the labour party has stood for a belief in equality,
arguing for a permanent shift of power and wealth away from the rich,
privileged and powerful, to the poor, weak, and less privileged
members of society, in order to create a 'classless' society. The
Labour Party has also traditionally believed in equal opportunities
for everybody, and positive discrimination in favour of the poor,
underprivileged, and minority groups, to promote greater social
justice.
Furthermore, the Labour Party has traditionally believed in Social
Welfare, supporting state education, social services, and state
benefits, to ensure a minimum standard of living.
Finally, the Labour Party has traditionally been committed to Trade
Unionism, promoting and acknowledging Trade Union Rights, as well as
being affiliated with, and having strong links with many Trade Unions.
2. What Might the Labour Party argue are its achievements in the 20th
Century?
The Labour party arguably made many ac...
... middle of paper ...
...
First of all there was constitutional reform, with Tony Blair
rewriting the controversial Clause 4 of the 1918 Labour Party
Constitution, so that the Labour Party was no longer committed to the
nationalisation of key industries, which Thatcher had privatised.
Also, there was no talk of socialism or of the redistribution of
Wealth, with Blair making personal pledges over Tax, promises that he
stuck to, as Income Tax didn't increase. What's more, Blair introduced
the 'New Deal', as well as the national 'minimum wage', which helped
the poorest members of society. Finally, there was further
constitutional reform, with devolution for Scotland, Wales, and
Northern Ireland.
In general, 'New Labour' had moved to the centre of the political
spectrum, dropping some of their traditional believes in order to win
votes.
In 1924, for the first time the Labour government was appointed, headed by leader Ramsay Macdonald. At this time, a topic of much political debate was trade, Conservatives adopting a protectionist policy contrasting with the Liberal and Labour views in favour of free trade, and as the strongest free trade party it was asked to take office. Their main aims in 1924 were to deal with the increase in relative poverty in the country, mainly the situation of living conditions, and economically to restrict expenditure and maintain a balanced budget, known as retrenchment. It was also an important aim of the 1924 Labour government to prove themselves fit to govern, as a minority government they were under pressure to please, which many argue compromised the ideals of the party in an attempt to stay in power.
The Labour Party had lost the previous four elections, had an identity crisis, and was plagued by party in-fighting. The party had a choice of continuing to represent the working class and not win elections, or reform in order to win elections. The party chose to rebrand to appeal to liberal voters as a whole including the working class. The original constitution for the Labour Party was written in 1918, and clause four defined the goals and values of the party. The original clause four promoted, “common ownership of means of production, distribution, and exchange…”. One can see that Labour was originally a party for the working class. Labour wanted to protect the worker not the business, and was established as a class party. New Labour took many actions to appeal to a broader base, and amending clause four is the most iconic. The clause was amended in the mid 1990’s, and became much broader by using wishy washy language. Instead of calling for ownership of means of production and distribution, it instead called for broad policies that promote centre left progressive policies. The change to clause four separated New Labour from
The Significance of the Liberal Election Victory of 1906 “A quiet, but certain, revolution, as revolutions come in a constitutional country” was how Lloyd George hailed the election victory of 1906. The significance of the Liberal election victory of 1906 is that it laid down solid foundations to provide the welfare state we have today. It also saw the rise of the Labour Party, giving the working class its own political voice. The results of the 1906 election were literally a reversal of the 1900 election. The Liberals enjoyed the landslide victory that the conservatives had six years earlier.
In the run up to the election therefore the Liberals won the working class support. It was perhaps the working class who had the biggest effect on the result of the election, this proved to be in favour of the Liberal Party.
middle of paper ... ... Conservative rule. They stated they would repeal the Education and Licensing Acts and the Taff Vale case, thus attracting the Temperance movement, Nonconformists and working class. The Liberals guaranteed few reforms; they said they would try to do something about pensions but kept it vague so that the middle and upper classes would not be unduly worried enough to vote Conservative.
Did you know that the current leader of the New Democratic Party used to be a Liberal? Thomas Mulcair became the leader of the New Democratic Party after the death of Jack Layton. The New Democratic Party (NDP) is one of the major federal political parties in Canada. The NDP was formed in 1961 as the result of the merger of two different parties. There are numerous reasons why the people of Canada should vote for the NDP. Citizens of Canada should vote for the New Democratic Party because if elected, they promise to improve the environmental situation, provide better health care for Canadians, and improve the economy in Canada.
For the 71 years that the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) was in power, Mexico saw great political, social and economic upheaval. This can be seen in the evolution of the PRI party, whose reign over Mexican society came at the expense of true democracy. “A party designed for power, the PRI's mechanisms for success involved a combination of repressive measures. The party professed no specific ideology, enabling it to adapt to changing social, economic and political forces over time. It attached itself virtually all aspects of civil society, and in this way, it become the political extension and tool of the government.” In 2000, however, the PRI’s loss of its monopoly on political power and institutional corruption gave rise to inter-cartel violence that was created in the political void left after the PAN won the national presidential election. These conditions gave rise to the Zetas: a new type of cartel that changed the operational structure of previous drug cartels. The Zetas operate in a new militant structure associated with a higher brand of violence, which has led it to branch out beyond a traditional drug smuggling enterprise common under the PRI government. Simply put, the electoral defeat of the PRI in 2000 was supposed to usher in a more democratic era in Mexican politics. Instead, the PRI party’s defeat created a state of chaos that gave rise to inter-cartel violence and the birth of the Zetas cartel.
these ideas just as much as they are by the right of the labour party.
The Two Party System of UK It has often been said that the United Kingdom possesses a two party political system. However, any balanced argument on this issue must take into account both the differing perspectives from which this subject can be viewed and the time period which is being evaluated. The two party theory is not universally accepted and many people argue that the UK can best be described as a multi party, dominant party or even a two and a half or three party system, depending on how the subject is approached. The most commonly held view is that Britain is a two party system.
If I was a citizen in the United States of America back in 1790, I would want to be part of the Federalist Party. The Federalist Party was created by Alexander Hamilton, and his party wants a strong central government in America with power given to the wealthy and political leaders. The only other party back then was the justly named Anti-Federalist party. The Anti-Federalist party was started by Thomas Jefferson and this party had completely opposite views to the Federalists. Anti-Federalists focused on power among the individual states, as opposed to having a powerful central government. I would rather be a part of the Federalist Party because I agree with their decisions on the Bank of the United States, future American economy, changes to the Constitution, and their debate on which people should be allowed to participate in government decisions.
Throughout American history, labor unions have served to facilitate mediation between workers and employers. Workers seek to negotiate with employers for more control over their labor and its fruits. “A labor union can best be defined as an organization that exists for the purpose of representing its members to their employers regarding wages and terms and conditions of employment” (Hunter). Labor unions’ principal objectives are to increase wages, shorten work days, achieve greater benefits, and improve working conditions. Despite these goals, the early years of union formation were characterized by difficulties (Hunter).
Unions have become commonplace in the labor arena. They provide employees with a valuable tool that allows them to stand together against their employer to make sure that their rights are upheld in the workplace. This paper will focus on labor unions with regards to how they work in two very different companies, Ford Motor Company and United Airlines. Also, a brief history will be outlined as well as legislation regarding unions.
Marx outlines the goals that the Marxists should strive toward. He states that they do not form a separate party from the other working class parties and serves only to protect the interests of the proletariat. Marx states that the only differences between the Communist party and other working class parties are that Communists serve the proletariat regardless of nationality and that Communists must always represent the movement as a whole. This way, Communists are the most driven of the working class parties because they have a clearly defined goal and standard operating procedure. This goal is the same as all other proletariat parties, as Marx
It is very important for people working in a large organization to have and be part of a union. A labor union is defined as a collection of workers who come together to meet common goals and practices. It is good to be in a union because the workers that belonging to a union can bargain with their employers. Collective bargaining is one of the most important aspects for any union whether it be sports or any other labor pool. This condition allows the employees to ask for their rights in a collective manner that is in the form of unions. Employee involvement, if structured correctly it will improve the economic productivity of the firm. This is why the workers feel a duty for collective bargaining as it provides them with a strong collective voice. Many of the workers have also expressed a preference for representation through an employee organization that interacts with management in an opposing manner.
It is well known that the British political system is one of the oldest political systems in the world. Obviously, it was formed within the time. The United Kingdom of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the constitutional monarchy, providing stability, continuity and national focus. The monarch is the head of state, but only Parliament has the right to create and undertake the legislation. The basis of the United Kingdom’s political system is a parliamentary democracy. Therefore, people think the role of the Queen as worthless and mainly unnecessarily demanding for funding, but is it like that?