Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial inequality in the united states
Racial inequality in the united states
Racial inequality in the united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial inequality in the united states
The Ku Klux Klan
The Ku Klux Klan, better known as the KKK, was started
in Tennessee in 1866. The people who believed in "White
Pride" came together against the advancement of African
Americans, Jews, and other minorities. The KKK
members were very violent and used harsh actions to get
their point across, but their actions were supported by their
strong belief in their religion and the culture in which they
were brought up in. The Klan did as it believed, they did
what they thought was right and for their time period they
were just acting in the way their culture brought them up to
act. The name Ku Klux Klan comes from the Greek word
kuklos, meaning circle. The oldest symbol of unity is a
circle. The Klan represents itself as the "oldest American
White civil rights group." The KKK's history has been split
into five eras. Former Confederate General Nathan
Bedford Forrest founded the First Era in 1866. The Klan
was formed during the Reconstruction Era of United States
history. Klan members went on "night rides." On "night
rides" the KKK members dressed in white robes and went
to houses belonging to empowered blacks and instituted
fright into their hearts. They would threaten these blacks
with what would happen if they voted or took positions of
power. They often whipped, mutilated or even killed any
black that didn't comply with the KKK's ideas. The
Second Era of the KKK reigned from 1915-1925. This
Second Era of Klansmen came together against the blacks
that were trying to take a spot in the community with the
NAACP. The Klan provided middle-class whites with
stability. This era of the Klan came together against African
Americans, Catholics, Jews, Asians, immigrants, anyone
who had pre-and extra-marital escapades, and many other
minorities. This Klan era was the First Era to use
automobiles as part of the lynching. The Third Era was
started in May of 1954 when the Supreme Court ruled that
segregating of public schools by race was unconstitutional.
This generation of Klansmen at one point numbered
40,000. In 1857 as a result of the Montgomery Bus
boycott, a group of Klan members torched four African
American Churches. At one point a count was taken and
there had been over one hundred and fifty acts of racial and
anti-Semitic acts of violence in the south. The Third Era
mainly used their own forms of bombs to de...
... middle of paper ...
...at blacks and other minorities are receiving more
chances than whites are. They disagree strongly with
affirmative action and special treatment for minorities.
Today's KKK's purpose is to stop minorities from rising.
These minorities are getting more chances than whites do.
Since so many people believe this so strongly, just as they
did in 1866 when it all began, the KKK still exists. It's
members still strive to keep the white race on the top of the
hierarchy. People say that racism would decrease if the
American government didn't put as much emphasize on
skin color and ethnicity. In today's world if blacks weren't
given any advantages and made to work as hard as a white
would to make themselves prosperous then the Fifth Era of
the KKK would diminish because they would have nothing
to fight against. Through five eras of the KKK American
racism has come a long way, from slavery to
anti-affirmative action, the KKK has stood its ground and
did what they were brought up to do. Though sometimes
their acting may have been a bit extreme these whites were
brought up to fight for "white pride" and as any member of
a faith they fought for what they thought was right.
In the Maasai society, genital cutting is a rite of passage from childhood to adulthood, and both men and women go through the process of circumcision. As society ages, opinions on cultural norms change. This is true for the Maasai society, where the views on female circumcision have and are changing. Female circumcision is classified into three categories, and defined by the World Health Organization, Type I is the removal of the foreskin on the vagina, Type II is the removal of the clitoris, and Type III is the removal of all external genitalia with the stitching or narrowing of the vaginal opening (“New Study”). Traditionally in the Maasai society, women underwent Type II or Type III circumcision. Written in 1988, “The Initiation of a Maasai Warrior,” by Tepilit Ole Saitoi, and is an autobiographical story of Saitoti’s circumcision in his initiation to a warrior. Though his story mainly focuses on the male circumcision part of the Maasai society, women’s circumcision and other basic traditions are discussed. Throughout the short story, the topic of circumcision and the rite of passage, both long- standing traditions in the Maasai society, are central themes.
They hated anyone who was not a white Christian, and would go as far as to kill anyone who was not. This group is the Ku Klux Klan. This group of people were known primarily for their very Nazi-based ideologies, which in turn, they ended up murdering many who were not white, or even burning down the homes and business’ of those who weren’t. They were strongly against the progressive movement of the American Government toward the African American people. Although today this group has lost many in numbers, there are still a surprisingly large amount of people who are part of
Hooded Americanism: The First Century of the Ku Klux Klan: 1865 to the Present by David Chalmers records the history of the Ku Klux Klan quite bluntly, all the way from its creation following the civil war, to the early 1960’s. The author starts the book quite strongly by discussing in detail many acts of violence and displays of hatred throughout the United States. He makes a point to show that the Klan rode robustly throughout all of the country, not just in the southern states. The first several chapters of the book focus on the Klan’s creation in 1865. He goes on to discuss the attitude of many Americans following the United State’s Civil War and how the war shaped a new nation. The bulk of the book is used to go through many of the states, and express the Klan’s political influence on both the local and state governments. The author starts with Texas and Oklahoma, and goes through the history of the Klan geographically, finishing with New Jersey and Washington. The author stresses that the KKK did not just commit acts of violence towards minorities, but also carried political power. He continues to discuss the impact of the Klan on Civil Rights movements in the 1960’s, and various other important political controversies between the 1920’s and 1970’s. Towards the middle of the book, David M. Chalmers focuses on portraying the feelings of governments and state legislatures, as well as normal citizens towards the Klan. To do this more effectively, the author uses excerpts and quotes from editorials and newspapers, along with several dozen pictures. The conclusion of the book was used mainly as an overview of all of the major incidents and deaths involving the Klan, and how their persistence has allowed them to still exist today despite a lack of resources and support.
Are these dogs misunderstood? In reality a dog is a reflection of its human, they see you as a pack leader they are who you raise them to be no matter the breed. If you neglect your puppy by chaining them up outside their whole life or keep them in
Even though the economy was on the move, the 1920s was an important time in regards to anxiety and intolerance. The KKK and gangs are causing a lot of disruption in America. The KKK was upset because of the new times in America. They were not accustomed to the change that was going on in America. They were deeply upset and lashed out in opposition by holding marches and cross burnings.
surrounded by their own kind. The KKK states “Our purpose is to unite, organize, and educate
White Southerners who hated blacks started the Ku Klux Klan in 1866. It was also called the KKK. They tried to stop black people from voting and having other civil rights. They would wear white sheets and masks with pointed hoods. They would beat up blacks and public officials. They would burn crosses by the houses of people they wanted to scare. The KKK was declared illegal in 1...
...hat patients should be allowed to make the decision of the right time to end their life’s and to always have the right to die with dignity. Without physician assistance people who are terminal ill may commit suicide in a messy, horrifying and traumatic way. Terminal ill patients sometimes suffer discomfort and pains so terrible that is beyond the comprehension of those who have not actually experienced it. The options given to those individuals to end their own life can saved them from their misery, therefore such policies are morally right. Also with allowing this policies we can spare a lot of suffering to the family, without a doubt it can be traumatic for a family member see their loved ones slowly die. Sometimes terminal ill patients remain connected to artificial respirators devices, taking strong doses of painkillers and in general living an unworthy life.
Euthanasia is growing towards legal acceptance in the United States where four states have already passed legalization laws in an attempt to relieve the pain of suffering patients. Even if euthanasia becomes a legal practice in the United States, lingering moral issues will continue to cause more lawsuits in the future. It is morally right for patients suffering from persistent, severe pain to choose euthanasia as a medical treatment option. In the following pages, I will, first, explain what euthanasia refers to and some details about what it entails. Second, I will describe all the necessary features about what it means to be suffering from constant and severe pain. Next, I will explore the philosophical attitudes toward the euthanasia of Dax Cowart and Jack Kevorkian who have strong philosophical attitudes toward euthanasia. Finally, I will tie all these points together to prove why euthanasia is a morally acceptable choice for a patient suffering from constant, severe pain.
Female genital mutilation (also known as female circumcision) is the cutting of female clitoral hood and removing clitoris. Following the cutting of female genital organ, there are many short-term and long-term health risk problems, and even death due to some complicated infections. The reasons for performing female genital mutilation are connected with socio-cultural beliefs, attitudes, values and customs, transition of girls into womanhood, tradition and cultural heritage, the fear of not having access to resources and opportunities as a young woman, perception to reduce sexual desire of females; hence, will sustain premarital virginity, and maintain marital fidelity. Actions have taken at international, national and regional levels since the past many years and have begun to bear fruits, but the practice is still undergoing in many countries in the world and highly prevalent in Africa. To continue and motivate further reduction in changing the society’s attitudes towards female genital mutilation in the countries where the prevalence has remained stable so it’s therefor...
Many of us never heard of Female Genital Mutilation until the story of Kauziya Kasinga, a woman from West Africa. Her father did not believe in polygamy, forced marriage, or "female circumcision". He died when she was 17 and the father's sister inherited the home, banished the mother, ended Fauziya's schooling, and arranged a marriage as a fourth wife to a man she had never met. The aunt scheduled her for the circumcision and she ran with 3,000 dollars that one of her aunts had saved.
Anyone can be diagnosed with a terminal illness. It doesn’t matter how healthy you are, who you are, or what you do. Some terminal illnesses you can prevent by avoiding unhealthy habits, eating healthily, exercising regularly and keeping up with vaccinations. However some terminally ill people cannot be helped, their diseases cannot be cured and the only thing possible to help them, besides providing pain relieving medication, is to make them as comfortable as possible while enduring their condition. Many times the pharmaceuticals do not provide the desired pain escape, and cause patients to seek immediate relief in methods such as euthanasia. Euthanasia is the practice of deliberately ending a life in order to alleviate pain and suffering, but is deemed controversial because many various religions believe that their creators are the only ones that should decide when their life’s journey should reach its end. Euthanasia is performed by medical doctors or physicians and is the administration of a fatal dose of a suitable drug to the patient on his or her express request. Although the majority of American states oppose euthanasia, the practice would result in more good as opposed to harm. The patient who is receiving the euthanizing medication would be able to proactively choose their pursuit of happiness, alleviate themselves from all of the built up pain and suffering, relieve the burden they may feel they are upon their family, and die with dignity, which is the most ethical option for vegetative state and terminally ill patients. Euthanasia should remain an alternative to living a slow and painful life for those who are terminally ill, in a vegetative state or would like to end their life with dignity. In addition, t...
Female genital mutilation, also known as female circumcision, is a practice that involves the removal of part or all of the female external genitalia. It occurs throughout the world, but most commonly in Africa where they say that it is a tradition and social custom to keep a young girl pure and a married woman faithful. But to some Westerners, the practice is viewed as being primitive and barbaric. We react with disgust and find it nearly incomprehensible that female genital mutilation can occur in the world today
The act of euthanasia may be justifiable, in that it gives those in pain an escape from their lives, however, it places a lot of power in the patient’s healthcare provider. Medical professionals are more pessimistic in patients’ diagnosis and rate their live value lower than it actually is (Pawlick and DiLascio 2). The negative diagnosis of these medical practitioners makes the patient feel especially drawn to euthanasia as a solution for the problem they may possess. Furthermore, the legalization of euthanasia would “cause society to devalue all life,” in that it makes everyone, not just patients, feel that euthanizing those who have medical issues is a better way to fix problems within our society, rather than treating them (Wekesser 64). Those against legalization say that the open availability for someone to end their life could lead to people feeling “more driven toward, or even forced” to be euthanized due to their emotional, rather than physical, pain (Lee and Stingl 1). During times of hardship such as a terminal illness, one often feels that their life is decreasing in value under the circumstances of the effective suffering their situation causes to the family and loves ones around them. It is therefore easier to end their life in a way that puts ease on the family and loved ones, in a
In Searching for “Voices”: Feminism, Anthropology, and the Global Debates over Female Genital Operations, Walley discusses the social issues concerning female genital operations as perceived by “westerners”, as well as discusses her ethnographic account of female circumcision. Her main purpose of doing this was to lay the groundwork for “a more productive feminist and anthropological debate” capable of going beyond the binary terms in which female circumcisions are usually discussed. Since female circumcisions are known by a variety of names, such as female genital mutilation and female genital torture, and with her understanding of the negative connotation often associated with those varieties of names, Walley makes the decision to adopt the term female genital operations instead. In 1988, Walley went in the village of KiKhome, in western Kenya as an English teacher and immersed herself in the lives of the people living around the village to better understand the practice of female genital operations as an outsider. One day, some of her students invited her to assist at a female genital operation ceremony. She found out that the participants see circumcision as a rite of passage into adulthood. However, she truly wanted to know the participants’ personal views on the topic rather than the imposed views of their parents and their culture. The four women she interviewed told her that “their custom was good,” and it was something that a person needs to accept with her whole being not to feel the pain. Nevertheless, some of the women told her that they would not want their daughters to undergo circumcision, and that they themselves regretted having done the procedure. Walley finally gave up “searching for real voices,” because what t...