Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss the cause of the opium war
Discuss the cause of the opium war
The opium war dbq
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discuss the cause of the opium war
A. Plan of Investigation
The aim of this investigation is to establish the extent in which Captain Charles Elliot’s actions the Kowloon Incident of July 1839 lead to the First Opium War. In order to assess this, the research will focus on the Kowloon Incident, the interests and actions of the Commissioner of Canton, Lin Zexu and the British Superintendent of Trade in China, Charles Elliot, the Chinese legal system and the question of extraterritoriality. The investigation will consist on books as sources, such as The Opium Wars: Drugs, Dreams and the Making of China by Julia Lovell, and The Opium War Through Chinese Eyes by Arthur Waley. They will be evaluated for their origins, purposes, limitations, and values.
Word count: 132
B. Summary of Evidence
Kowloon Incident:
- Opium-carrying ships in Macao sailed forty miles northeast to Hong Kong’s harbor for better protection.
- Safe for the Bogue (entrance to Canton riverways).
- Chinese warship arrested comprador of British ship (Carnatic) and sailors plotted revenge.
- July 1839: 30 English and American sailors got blind drunk with fortifies rice wine (samshu), destroyed a temple and fought with local peasants in Jianshazui.
- Lin Weixi died a day later of severe beating.
- Embittered Chinese-English relations.
Elliot’s decisions:
- Elliot rushed to distribute bribes to the family, for evidence of murderer, to villagers and government.
- August 17th: Elliot said that in obedience with the Queen’s instructions, he could not hand anyone over, but if found, he would be executed.
- Lin responded that his Sovereign ‘is myriads of leagues away’ and it was impossible to have received a reply in so little time.
- Blamed American sailors, who were also present. This complicat...
... middle of paper ...
... he had no power to hold, where five out of six men were guilty of violence. They were freed when they were sent back to England. Lin was aware of the foolishness that Elliot was putting up, and even refused to let government officials to attend to the trial.
Word count: 667
E. Conclusion
Captain Charles Elliot acted according to his nation’s interests in regards of the Kowloon Incident, responding to the different decisions made by Commissioner Lin Zexu. The Chinese were very demanding for the justice of the Lin Weixi case. This encircled Elliot in a situation of war, since Commissioner Lin limited their supplies, had no escape of the ruthlessness of the Chinese legal system, and was not granted the benefit of extraterritoriality. This is why Captain Smith, with the permission of Elliot, fired the first gunshots of the First Opium War in September 4th, 1839.
Each lacked the sufficient evidence for conviction, most especially for the death penalty. Lastly, heroes emerged from each trial and made small but solid steps towards equal justice for all. “ROOSEVELT IS ASKED TO INTERVENE TO PROTECT SCOTTSBORO NEGROES: Warning of 'Massacre' of Seven Prisoners and Their Lawyers at Decatur (Ala.) Court Today, Defense Counsel Wire President a Plea to Obtain State Troops” (Linder), reads a headline from the New York Times on November 20, 1933. The nine Scottsboro boys accused of rape and their attorneys were scared to death, but the government did not seem to acknowledge their danger.
Allingham,, Philip V. "England and China: The Opium Wars, 1839-60." The Victorian Web: An Overview. 24 June 2006. Web. 06 Apr. 2011.
.guilty. . .guilty. . .guilty. . .” (211). By using only four guilty’s, Lee is able to demonstrate that the word of two white people has a greater effect than that of an African American even though the man who was put up for his life had not harmed, nor had he ever damaged anything he came into contact with.
Often, they struggled with the fact that although there were laws in place, these laws rarely applied to slaves. With this constant questioning, Judge William Hall decided to take this trial as an opportunity to address the conflict, disputing any claims of an unfair trial by providing Celia with a talented attorney named John Jameson. Jameson was thought to be able to give a “presence [that] would make it difficult for slavery’s critics to label the trial a farce or sham.”(82) It can be noted that although Celia had the right to a trial, she was not guaranteed a fair trial. One of the blatant disregards to a fair trial was that Celia was not allowed to testify in her own defense. “For under Missouri law, as was the case in many southern states, a slave could not testify against a white person, even one deceased” (108) as noted by McLaurin. This law often resulted in slaves receiving a bias trial in favor of those bringing charges against them. Unlike most attorney’s, Jameson fought valiantly for Celia , arguing that in this situation, Celia had a right to protect herself(103). If an altercation escalated far enough, slaves in “slaveholding states…[had] the right to use force to repel physical attacks that threatened his or her life” (102).This right not only allowed slaves to defend themselves physically but legally as well. With these basic
Drummond is adamantly fighting for the truth throughout the trial and will not stop until he has revealed it to the people. He illustrates his persistent search for the truth and justice when he says, “You know that’s not true. I’m trying to stop you bigots and ignoramuses from controlling the education of the United States! And you know it!” (Lawrence and Lee 98).
“The trial was brought to a speedy conclusion. Not only did Judge Evans find the twelve guilty, fine them $100 each, and committed them to jail, but five people in the courtroom who had served as witnesses for the defense arrested. […] The police were then instructed to transfer the seventeen prisoners that night to the county jail”(30).
The severe drought that “took place in Henan Province in 1847, the flooding of the Yangtze River in the four provinces of Hubei, Anhui, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang, and the famine in Guangxi in 1849” left many Chinese families devastated and homeless (“Chinese Immigrants”). Moreover, the importation of opium created social and economic crisis in China. Due to the high taxes that was caused by the Opium War, many farmers were forced to give up their land. However, when merchant vessels brought news of the “gold mountain” in the United States, hordes of Chinese men took the opportunity to start a new life in America. During the year 1852, about “20,026 Chinese flooded the San Francisco customs house” (“Chinese Immigrants and the Gold Rush”). Near the end of the year 1850, “Chinese immigrants made up one-fifth of the population of the four countries that constituted the Southern Mines” in California (“Chinese Immigrants and the Gold
One Saturday night, a mob of masked men, who numbered forty to sixty, approached a small house. Arriving at the house, they dragged two slumbering men from their bunks and hustled them from the house, without even allowing them to put on their clothes, and started to kick and beat them. One of the invaders drew his pistol and shot at one of the victims. The bullet pierced the body of the man and inflicted a terrible wound. Both men who were attacked that night died. This event occurred in Rico, a camp in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado on May 13, 1882. The two Chinese miners that inhabited the village were kicked, cuffed, and dragged over the ground by the hair of their heads, clubbed with pistols and sticks by white men who wanted to run the Chinese out of town. Six Chinamen who resided next door were treated in much the same manner as their friends were that night. Mongolians of the village were thrown into the icy water half-naked.
...ine month period in the year of 1847 where the Irish exported grain-derived alcohol to England. They exported 874,170 gallons of Porter, 278,658 gallons of Guinness, and 183,392 gallons of Whiskey. The total amount of grain-derived alcohol exported from Ireland was 1,336,220 gallons.
Warsh, Cheryl Krasnick. ""John Barleycorn Must Die": An Introduction to the Social History of Alcohol ." In Drink in Canada: Historical Essays , by Cheryl Karsnick Warsh, 3-26. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1993. (SUNY Stony Brook HV 5306.D75 1993)
The geography of China was something like a fence. This isolation made the people of China feel like their country was prestigious and secluded from the rest of the world. With deserts and the Himalayas running along most of the border, it was extremely difficult to cross over one of the most dangerous mountain ranges in the world and a few other scorching deserts with the little transport they had during that time. The only way merchants could come into the country was the southeastern coast of China where most of the prosper cities resided. What led China to become conceited was because they had an abundant of goods that most of the world wanted. In 1760-1830s, China was famous for its porcelain (rich Europeans loved it), silk, and of course, tea. Since this Eastern Powerhouse’s goods were so popular, therefore, there were only a few things that interested them to trade with. It seemed as if tea was a drug for the Europeans because for them it was just so addicting, to the point they would do anything just to get more and more. The only things that were worthy for trading with the Chinese were gingko (type of plant), shark fin, a soft type of wood (used for incense) and silver. As the demand for tea rose, Britain gradually ran out of silver to trade with, and was desperate to find what China wanted. Then, the British resorted to trading opium. China was very picky of their opium. There was a certain kind of make they wanted, it was a compact ball wr...
These injustices have begun long before Tom’s trial, but it is his trial which epitomizes the problems with our society. The first witness was simply just a misguided fellow named Heck Tate who it seems didn’t have much to offer to the case. Next, Atticus Finch called Bob Ewell to the stand. When I saw Ewell take the stand such a fierce hatred rose within me that I began to shake and tremble. Ewell wrongfully accused Tom of raping his daughter Mayella, however, with the grace of God, Atticus Finch had shown that it was very possible that it was Bob Ewell who because he was a lefty could have beat Mayella. If it were not for great men like Atticus Finch I would have lost all hope for this world. As I watched Mayella take the stand I wondered how such a kind looking person could be someone of such poor character. Her words seemed to paint a picture of a sad life; one where a father neglects her and she has fallen under hard times. Atticus, after pointing out it was probably Bob who beat her, asked Mayella who it really was that beat her. Mayella made it clear it was Tom Robinson, upon which Atticus asked Tom to stand. To the astonishment of the court Tom was handicapped! Tom was then called to the stand where he laid open for all to see the truth, explaining that it was Mayella who came on to him (that treacherous woman!). Soon enough the trial ended and every one awaited the verdict of the jury. The next few hours were the most nerve wracking of my life.
wrong to Sir Toby to be put in a dark room and bound up. I felt no
“In San Francisco, a jury trying a prohibition case was found drinking up the liquor that had been used in court as evidence” (Edey 154). In Texas, shortly after the start of prohibition,” a still turning out 130 gallons of whiskey a day was found operating on the farm of Senator Morris Shepard, author of the 18th Amendment”(Edey 154).
Fay, Peter Ward. 1997. Opium War, 1840-1842 : Barbarians in the Celestial Empire in the Early Part of the Nineteenth Century and the War By Which They Forced Her Gates Ajar. University of North Carolina Press, 1997. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed December 4, 2011).