Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Innovation value chain
Impact of innovation on organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Innovation value chain
In to the article “The Innovation Value Chain”, Hansen and Birkinshaw discussed how the innovation challenges, in reality, are different from one company to another, and they indicated that “ there is no universal solution for organizations wanting to improve their ability to generate, develop, and disseminate new ideas.” In fact, I think this is the truth because organizations are different in the size, capacities, management systems, culture, and to what extend employees’ skills. Therefore, good solutions for one company’s challenges not necessary work for another one even if they are at the same level, and, sometimes in this same company, a successful solution that works for one situation might be wasteful or even harmful. In the article, …show more content…
For example, if a company has not difficulties in generating ideas from its creative employees, and they have good new ideas for new products, but it did not have a process for selecting best ideas and remove the others. The creative employees became more frustrated seeing their creative talents and brainstorm efforts not developed to get those good ideas to market, consequently, will make the relationship between creative employees and managers worse, and these employees will eventually leave the company to find a better innovative place to …show more content…
But the truth, according to the authors’ thoughts, is that managers were strengthening on one part which coursed debilitate the other parts of the chain, as a result, weaken the company’s overall innovation capabilities.
Therefore, my company needs to consider the following implication to be better in innovation: 1) managers should take the end-to-end view of all the innovation efforts in the company to determine where are the problems in the innovation process. 2) We need to fix the poor conversion by implementing a formal system to manage the ideas flow, which will improve the company’s ability to make a good screening and selecting of good ideas. 3) The management is very afraid of risk on moving forward and very strict in funding criteria that cause a lot of shutting down to most of the ideas, and for that reason, we need to have a good mechanism for funding the new ideas.
The article has done a good job in demonstrating how using the approach of innovation value chain help managers to identify the companies’ innovation challenges and, as a result, be more selective about innovation tools and improve the companies’ innovation
...resent diversity within the labor force and “each of them will also have networks of professional associates whose knowledge they can tap in order to solve problems and accomplish tasks. Needless-to-say, diverse people will have diverse networks and provide your company with a vast and diverse meta-network at your disposal” (p.1). In short, in supporting of creativity, innovators essentially need the backing from top leaders, and without that support, many initiatives may break down or die on the vine (Harvard). For any idea to be successful, it is vital that it is aligned with company strategy; there is more likely to occur naturally when top executives involve and take the lead with a idea or creativity initiative and this is a main reason why management commitment is a key factor in the accomplishment of any idea or innovation process (Baumgarther, 2010).
In this essay I am going to highlight the complex nature of an organisation and critically analyse management issues faced using two Organisation Theory lens. I will use Coles Supermarket as my case organisation to reveal how such theories can aid in bringing to light issues a business may face, and how to combat them effectively through appropriate managerial and leadership strategies. Firstly in section one, I will introduce Coles as the case organisation with the necessary statistics and facts informing you of it's nature and position. In section two I will summarise the key points and justify my choice of two Organisation Theory lens using relevant papers, namely: 1) Economic theory drawing on Daniel & Arce (2004) and Donaldson (1990)
Innovation has rapidly assumed a position of prominence in world competition on a global scale. To compete in this environment, organizations need a level of innovation. As competition becomes more global and time-based, organizations must develop and deliver new and superior products or services in less time. The challenge for modern organizations is to revitalize them so they can successfully and continuously develop newer products and enhance business development.
Kelley,T. (2005, Oct.). The 10 faces of innovation. Fast Company, 74-77. Retrieved 6th March’ 2014 from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=9&sid=1d6a17b7-c5f7-4f00-bea4 db1d84cbef55%40sessionmgr10&hid=28&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=bth&AN=18386009
This type of dysfunctional operation of an organization has many ways and opportunities for failure. The basic fundamentals of this process are the beginnings of failure as groups seek conformity and unity they sacrifice everything in order to maintain peace within the group. Many times this will take the individuals creative thoughts and ability to voice the creative edge thinking away. In many organizations this is a process that is continually used. It is perceived that management wants the organizations operation or process to run without any type of question or waves. Below are listed eight of the main symptoms of group think as detailed by Janis, I. L & Manns book “Decision making”
It takes those who have innovation in their hearts to drive them towards this goal. It is important that staff on the units take time to assess innovators and brain storm areas in which they can empower and motivate the others to follow. The culture and environment of units must be that of being willing to be open to change and new ideas so they can be assessed during initial meetings.
Hamel G. and Breen B. (2007). The Future of Management: Aiming for an Evolutionary Advantage (Management Innovation in Action). Harvard Business School Press.
The book has used peer-reviewed resources to enhance the use of professional approaches to innovation and management strategies by the readers who uses the book. The authors have given different management strategies and their practical application in business fields. As the title states, a strategy in business require innovative strategies for efficient development of the firm. More importantly, the book offers modern innovative ideas that need to be integrated with management strategies to develop modern businesses. The innovative approach provides a practical guide to the management strategies easing the execution of the strategies in the respectful environment. The book has given the strong relationships between innovation and strategies. These relationships are known to increase profitability in business organizations that use them efficiently. It offers how business managers can create successful value through innovation. Value creation in companies is done through examining untapped markets, clients ' needs and investing in new businesses. Therefore, this remarkable book helps readers in innovating and managing business
The main objective of writing this paper is in practice, the management of innovative process takes into account the most important criteria that reflect the substance of innovation and arising directly from the definition of "disruptive innovation". Such criteria include the degree of novelty and substantive content.
Over the course of this class I have learned how important it is to be creative and innovative in the way that businesses are conducted within the organizations. The ability to innovate is the “secret sauce” of business success (Dyer, et al., 2009). However, creativity and innovation cannot take place if the leaders are not willing to foster a culture of innovation within the organization. Amabile & Khaire (2008) asserted that, it is essential to motivate people to contribute ideas by making it safe to fail. Stress that the goal is to experiment constantly, fail early and often—and learn as much as possible in the process. Convince people that they won’t be punished or humiliated if they speak up or make mistakes (Amabile & Khaire, 2008).
1).Innovation Management:Innovation Management is the form of looking into future, of being creative, imaginative .It is used in the growth of product and also organizational innovation. It also includes tools which allows higher management & engineers to communicate with basic understanding of goals and its processes .Its main focus is to allow the organization to react quickly occurring within an organization, using its efforts to implement new ideas or its products. It also involves persons in contributing to the development of the companies manufacturing and also its marketing. Through development also innovation process can be done. There are two types of process involved in innovation management one is pulled and the other is pushed. Pushed process is the one in which the organization uses its technology to discover profitable applications. Pulled process is the one in which the focus is mainly in developing the efforts to find the solutions. There are two phases in innovation management .First phase includes design of the innovation and second phase includes the implementation. Internal bench marking can be established to measure the innovation. Managers should focus on ones attention on innovation cause to be necessary to infer something from information received on the complexity.
Open innovation opens the doors for a vast array of ideas and suggestions that can help an organization succeed in being innovative. This will allow the organization to hold a competitive advantage when compared to their competition. Organizations who understand the importance of managing technological innovation will have an easier time succeeding than those organizations who feel they are safe and put innovation on the back burner. Managing technological innovation is essential in this day and age, where technology is advancing at a faster than
Innovations are basically when an specific idea is transformed into a better idea(Quinn p.287). According to Quinn, the best innovations come from teamwork. This means that when a managers is able to develop creative thinking among his employees, the value of the organization increases. Nonetheless, there are several barriers to creative thinking. Some of the barriers could be either cultural or personal. Cultural barriers are those barriers that keep society in their usual lifestyle. For instance, same sex marriage could be a cultural barrier since it is not accepted in most religions. “If we are able to diminish our cultural barriers to creative thinking, we enhance our abilities to think differently and develop skills for creativity (Quinn p.290).” Many ideas may not be accepted by society at the beginning, but at the end, that 's what makes someone unique and trendy. Similar to cultural barriers, personal barriers are those that make people fear failure and those barriers that are against an individual beliefs. Examples of personal barrier are Resistance to change, fear of making a mistake, fear or failure or looking foolish, inability to tolerate ambiguity or to relax, tendency to judge rather than to generate ideas, self- criticism, conformity, stereotyping, lack of information (Quinn
1997). By reviewing the literature on learning and innovation, we try to answer the following
Organization operates in a strongly competitive environment manning creativity a vital component in business growth. Creativity is what sparks big ideas, challenges workers way of thinking and make way for new business opportunities,