Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature has more influence than nurture
Nature has more influence than nurture
Nature vs nurture do genes or environment matter more
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature has more influence than nurture
Nature versus nurture is one of the oldest and most studied debates in the history of psychology. This debate is about an individual’s genetic influences as opposed to the environmental influences on physical characteristics and intelligence (Rathus 197). Some think that genes determine an individual’s development and others think that it comes from how one was raised. My development was influenced by nature and nurture equally because I would not be myself if I did not get my ambition from my mother and my manners from my upbringing.
Nature refers to an individual’s genetic influences. Factors include biological and family traits (Rathus 198). For example, if a child is developing skills early and his parents are intelligent, then the child was clearly “born smart.” The coding in genes determines physical traits such
…show more content…
as hair and eye color, intelligence, personality, and even ear size. I have many physical traits that came from my mother. My mother and I are both short, have brown hair, have a large nose, and have one crooked toe on our right foot. I also have many personality traits from her. My mother is very intelligent and hard-working. I got my ambition from her because we both work hard in everything we do. Nurture refers to the environment in which one was raised. Factors include one’s childhood and environment (Rathus198). For example, if a child is developing skills early, then it is because of the child’s educational background and how they were raised. Those who believe that the intelligence was caused by nurture would give the credit to the child’s school background and upbringing. I developed my manners through nurture.
My parents raised me to know right from wrong and gave me reasons why things I did were wrong. I know this is nurture because if I knew manners already then I would have never got in trouble growing up. I had to learn this trait. This taught me to be aware of my actions and how they might affect other people. Another trait I could get through nurture is breast cancer. Most people think that you can only get breast cancer from heredity, but in everyday life, we are exposed to dangerous chemicals that could cause it (Breast Cancer). Nurture is something that we live and learn throughout our lives.
In conclusion, do we behave according to our experiences in our environment or are we born this way? My life was influenced by a little bit of both nature and nurture. I could not just pick one or the other because I have many physical traits from my mother and I also have learned traits from my childhood and how my parent’s raised me. The nature versus nurture debate will go on and on, but it is certain that everyone has traits that are predetermined by genes and everyone learns as they travel through their
lifetime.
Have you ever thought about whether the way you are is based on your genetic makeup? Do you believe our environment shapes us into who we are, instead? In the psychology debate of nature versus nurture, I believe that nurture plays a big role in who
The nature vs. nurture controversy is an age old question in the scientific and psychological world with both camps having evidence to support their theories. The controversy lies in which is more influential in the development of human beings. While there is no definitive answer for this, it is interesting to look at each of them separately.
“The term “nature versus nurture” is used to refer to a long-running scientific debate. The source of debate is the question of which has a greater influence on development: someone's innate characteristics provided by genetics, or someone's environment. In fact, the nature versus nurture debate has been largely termed obsolete by many researchers, because both innate characteristics and environment play a huge role in development, and they often intersect”. (Smith, 2010 p. 1)
Nurture is our personal experiences and our environment. It is the way we were brought up by our parents or guardians. How is nurture involved in my development growing up? For instance, growing up I was always kind of shy. My parents never really signed me up for any after school activities since they always had to work. Also, growing up since I was “different” I would get picked on for not looking like my peers. When I was little and in elementary school there were not many Hispanic kids and I always felt like the odd one. I did not get the chance to become confident by playing sports after school and since I would get picked on it made me not want to speak out much either. Today it is a different story I am a bit quiet, but I am no longer shy and I’ve learned to be more
Genes or life experiences? What determines who you truly are? The nature versus nurture debate is one of the most popular debates throughout history. It questions whether genetics are the thing that decide who you are, or whether it is the life experiences that influence your characteristics and qualities. Did you gain that good humour from your mother? Or is it simply there due to the influences in the environment you grew up in? A rather vast selection of traits have been discussed in this type of debate – personality, gay or straight, political orientation, intelligence, and even your likeliness to be involved in violence. On the “Nature” side of the argument, it is believed that everything about us is already in our genes, and in some cases it is obvious that it is entirely down to genetics such as physical features and hereditary health issues. In opposition to this we have the “Nurture” half, it does not include just the love and care children receive by the people they have been raised by, but in a modern day debate environmental factors –such as friends from someone’s youth, surrounding culture, occurrences with technology, and even experiences from in the womb- are included. In my own personal view I believe that there are certain aspects in both arguments that provide evidence for equality in both nature and nurture.
Nurture Over Nature There seems to be a universal debate on whether people act the way they do as a result of how they were raised and what they are surrounded with, or if their decisions and actions are simply determined by genetics. In the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of young British boys are in a plane crash and stranded on an island together with no adults, forcing them to get along and take care of themselves. The articles Nature Vs. Nurture Debate In Psychology by Saul Mcleod and The End of Nature Versus Nurture by Evan Nesterak both discuss experiments and conduct research regarding whether nature or nurture has a bigger role in individual behaviors.
Today, a new approach to dealing with this question is emerging. This new approach finds a middle ground between nature and nurture. The conclusion that nature and nurture are complementary and work hand and hand. to shape a behavior (a purposeful and meaningful activity) is not a compromise. It is a result of a vigorous study of each of the components of the equation of heredity and environment and their affects on determining one’s development.
One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what
Undoubtedly, humans are unique and intricate creatures and their development is a complex process. It is this process that leads people to question, is a child’s development influenced by genetics or their environment? This long debate has been at the forefront of psychology for countless decades now and is better known as “Nature versus Nurture”. The continuous controversy over whether or not children develop their psychological attributes based on genetics (nature) or the way in which they have been raised (nurture) has occupied the minds of psychologists for years. Through thorough reading of experiments, studies, and discussions however, it is easy to be convinced that nurture does play a far more important in the development of a human than nature.
In the history of psychology, the nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest argument in psychology. Nature and nurture have their own good sides but it's really hard to identify whether a person develops majority of the genetic or a majority of its influence by the environment and the experience in life. As we know that, nature and nurture are very crucial in part of the human development. Nowadays, there are 5 major perspectives in psychology which can help to explain the evolution of human behaviour around nature and nurture.
One of the most well-known debates in psychology is nature versus nurture. Nature is pre-determined traits, influenced by biological factors and genetics. Physical characteristics such as height, hair color, and eye color is all determined by the genetics we inherit. Nurture is the influence of environmental factors. Nature and nurture affects the physical, emotional, and social development of a child.
For years, many have argued nature versus nurture. After years of arguments and experimentation, it has become widely regarded
Have you ever wondered how you got the colors of your eyes from your mother, and the freckles from your father? And where did you get your diligent personality and talent for singing? Did you learn those from your surroundings, or was it predetermined by your genes given from your parents? While it’s clear to us that physical traits are inheritance from the past generation, the genetic parts get a bit more sophisticated when it comes to intelligence, personality, and an individual's behavior. Throughout ages, the arguments of nature vs nurture has been brought up probably more than the number of hairs on our head, but neither side have yet to prove that one is strong than of another. We do not know how much of what we are is determined by our genetic information and how much by our life experience. Some scientists think that people act as they do according to genetic predisposition or even "animal instincts," known as the nature theory of human behavior, while scientists believe that people think and behave in certain wa...
Jerome Kagan once said, “Genes and family may determine the foundation of the house, but time and place determine its form.” This quote recognizes that nature and nurture both have roles in determining why people are who they are. Nature states that people are defined based on genes passed down to them. On the other side, nurture states that people are who they are based on how their society and environment has shaped them. Nature versus Nurture has been a hot debate for many years. Both explanations hold some truth, but some people believe that one side is the only explanation.
Nature vs. Nurture is one of the oldest psychological debates that make us ponder on if heredity or our environment impacts our development. When we are born into this lovely world we have no idea or preferences on anything just like a blank piece of notebook paper. As we grow up we learn and develop our own identity and personality. The real question to this factor is do you become who you are to your surrounds or do your genes determine who you are? If you believe you have always had a set personality that never changed you always stayed who you are that was molded into your DNA then you are classified as nature. On the other hand if you are 100% positively sure that your personality developed on its own as you grow up to who you are takes the side of a nurture of this debate.