Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The consequences of the indian mutiny
The consequences of the indian mutiny
The role of east india company in india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The consequences of the indian mutiny
It all began with the Indian Mutiny, when a lone soldier acted against his commander by shooting him. Upon this action, many other rebellions took place in India proving a threat to the East India Company. The soldier’s feelings towards the East India Company were not alone, as many other Indian citizens had accumulated a hate for them too.
Following the widespread rebellion, the Indian rebels successfully defeated the East India Company (a wealthy trade company, who deployed small, private armies, gaining power in many parts of India), proclaiming an Indian rebel named Bahadur Shah the Emperor of India. Soon after, the British arrested the new Emperor, handing the power to Queen Victoria. Along with this shift in power, Britain formed
…show more content…
Therefore, the British were forced to divide the eastern Muslim areas from the western Hindu areas. For the British, this allowed for an easier, more efficient administration. The Hindus, however, believed this to be harmful, as they would be a minority their province. They thought the British were attempting to lessen the Bengali nationalism, which was very strong in Bengal. To appease the people of Bengal, Britain was forced to reunite Bengal as a whole. This change took place in 1911. While the Hindus were pleased with this act, the Muslims believed the change to be benefitting, and would be angry for years to …show more content…
This allowed the British to imprison anyone without trial, for up to two years. The goal of this law was to suppress conspiracy and public unrest. Gandhi and other Indian leaders were angered by this law, and decided to fast, secluding themselves from the commerce of India, in order to express their feelings towards the British. After violent riots in multiple provinces, Gandhi was forced to end his seclusion, and put an end to the violence. While Gandhi did oppose British rule, he did not believe violence was an option.
Only a few months after the Rowlatt Act was enacted, non-violent protesters gathered in the Jallianwala Bagh Gardens to protest the arrests of two people, who had been taken to a place unknown to the citizens of India. On the order of General Dyer, a British army fired upon the large crowds at the protest, leaving 370 dead and 1000 wounded. This day “brutally stunned the entire nation, resulting in a wrenching loss of faith.”
Gandhi served 2,338 days in prison -- 3.5 years-- just to prove that violence would never be the answer. When Gandhi heard that his fell Indian protesters had been sentenced to three months in prison he stated, “ If these men had committed an offense, I had committed a greater offense and I therefore asked the Magistrate to impose upon me the heaviest penalty…. I well remembered that I … did not feel the slightest hesitation in entering the prisoner’s box” (Document C). This proves that Gandhi was more than willing to prove to the British -- ruling India -- that he
Thousands of years ago, Indian society developed into a complex system based on different classes. This system was known as the Caste System. It separated Indians into different castes based on what class were born into. As thousands of years went by, this system grew larger and became further complex (Wadley 189). This system caused frustration for the Indian citizens because they were receiving inequality. Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement
Compare and contrast the ‘Indian Mutiny’ and the Taiping rebellion as indigenous reactions to globalization.
Under British rule in India, the British were harshly oppressive and only interested in exploiting products from India for their own use, causing many Indians to become extremely poor. They became so oppressed they were on the verge of violent civil disobedience, when Gandhi appeared to negotiate with the British threw non-violent tactics such as sit-ins and hunger strikes. The people were supportive on Gandhi and were set to become violent if anything happened to him. Things were resolved without violence.
...was experiencing. Lastly, Gandhi continued to struggle with the satyagraha belief and was willing to devote his time on demanding the British to “quit India.” However, despite being imprisoned for this campaign, Gandhi aroused upheaval from the Indians who insisted the British to remove Gandhi from captivity. After the execution of the Salt March, the events that followed supported Gandhi’s philosophy on the satyagraha movement and further more brought India closer to its Independence from the British colonization.
Gandhi is motivated by religious means; he believes that everyone is equal in God’s eyes. He gets involved in several movements for equality, and he stresses non-violence very strongly. The Indians are very mad because British rule continues to limit their rights. They are supposed to all get fingerprinted, and their marriage laws are invalid. Gandhi’s followers vow to fight their oppressors to the death, but he discourages them from violence.
When he refused to comply for their ridiculous viewpoint and tried to come to a peaceful agreement with them they had Gandhi thrown off the train. When Gandhi met with the Indian Congress in South Africa they stated that some Muslims and Hindus felt like they were nothing and to work in the mines. This was later enforced by dominance as when Gandhi and his early followers of his movements peacefully marched on the mines the owner tried to use force from the police that the workers were his property. Dominance was also used by the British viceroy after some British civilians were killed when the riots started; Gandhi wanted the violence to stop so one of the spokesman decided to have a peaceful rally at a stadium to talk about Gandhi about the violence and killings that they need to stop and for it to be peaceful. Unfortunately, British armed forces entered the stadium under the command of British General, "Reginald Edward Harry Dyer", entered the property then have his men open fire on the crowd with the belief that they broke the law since there was a martial law in place for which didn't allow large crowds to congregate for rallies.
Whilst the growth of Indian nationalism put considerable pressure on the Raj, historians offer many interpretations as to the fundamental cause of Independence. Gandhi’s non-cooperation movement and subsequent campaigns meant that nationalism began to appeal to the masses and helped establish a broad based movement for Independence. However, the British were always able to supress the nationalist movements, through reform or by using force, up to the Quit India movement of 1942. British involvement in the Great War and particularly the Second World War placed them in a weaker position economically, whilst the social and political expectations of the Indian people were changing, which strengthened nationalism and discontent.
In short, the Indian Mutiny resulted in the devastating slaughter men, women and children, whether they were British or Indian, Christian or Muslim. The Sepoy committed horrible acts towards all human beings, likewise, the British treated mutineers with ethnic aggression. Therefore, to understand the full extent of the rebellion, the actions of both the British and the sepoy must be
Gandhi was pissed and so he withdrew from public life once again. Just them in 1935 the British gave the Indians a great amount of rights but they were not happy.
This caused massive damage to the temple and killed hundreds of soldiers, Sikh militants, Bhindranwale included, and innocent bystanders -- both women and children. This strike created the domino effect which leads to the assassination of the Prime Minister, an international outcry from the Sikh communities, and subsequently a vicious anti-Sikh riot which killed thousands of people (BBC, 2014). Sikh men were ripped from their homes and set on fire in the streets in front of their families. This is a far cry from the original teaching of
1909-Revocation of Partition of Bengal. Creates anti-British and anti-Hindu sentiments among Muslims as they lose their majority in East Bengal.
By the year 1857 the British had established complete political control of India. As Western education was introduced and missionaries eroded Hindu society resentment among Indian people grew and it was joined by unease among the old governing class when the British decided to formally abolish the Mughal Empire.
perceive the strategic threat posed by the East India Company. The British from the beginning followed a
HOW SHOULD THE INDIAN MUTINY BE CHARACTERISED? SHOULD IT BE SEEN AS A POST PACIFICATION REVOLT, A NATIONALIST UPRISING, OR AS A WAR OF INDEPENDENCE?