Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of technology
Importance of technology
Importance of technology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of technology
3.Technology power
One of the most important factors that enabled a nation’s economic growth is the ability of the people to successfully absorb knowledge and skills from mature technology and then improving those techniques to fit their economy. The economic miracle did not occur simply from the reform policies, but the substantial upgrade of technology.
Many works of literature have studied the relationship between technology and economic growth. Technology determines the physical quantity of output that can be reached and how much contribute to economic growth. In other words, technology can be transformed into productivity gaining by an increase in efficiency and reduction costs. (Hall, 2011) Solow (1956) in his studies illustrated how
…show more content…
For instance, in recent years, new public services have become available online and through mobile phones. Information Communication technology enables the emergence of a new sector: the app industry. Research shows that the aggregate value of Facebook app economy exceeds $12 billion.
Furthermore, economists argue that technology without business application has no value.
Technology is a vital source of economic growth and high production. Research and Development (R&D) plays a crucial role to accelerate the technology progress. (Linda R.
Cohen and Roger G, 1991)
The so-called “new growth theory” emphasizes that economic growth is also promoted by the stock of human capital. Because people in businesses hold knowledge or innovative ideas. This is another reason Chinese government has spent vast sums of R&D fund in universities, technical labs, research institutions since 1978. Empirical evidence suggests that the social return to R&D spending on new technologies is as much as 50% to 100%. (Zvi Griliches,
…show more content…
(Irwin, 2002) Thanks to the emerging market like China, outsourcing of production processes became possible and led to a rise in both advanced nations and emerging nations.
Tracing back the evolution of the theory of global trade, Adam Smith indicated that one country would have an absolute advantage over the other if it can produce the same amount of goods with few resources. (Smith, 1776)
Besides, in Smith’s England once time, with the rapid growth of large-scale industries and captive markets in overseas colonies, had a solid base for lower labor costs and higher efficiency in production, which ensured its competition across the world at that time.
Another English economist, David Ricardo (1951) suggested that industry specialization combined with free trade produces positive results. It was the comparative and not absolute advantage, which was considered necessary to ensure mutually profitable trade across nations regarding labor hours used per unit of
“Our Future Selves” by Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen construct views on countries’ technologies that changes the world on a daily basis. Conversely, technologies reconstruct countries in various simpler ways to live throughout economic trends. Furthermore, the quality of life is massively changing with new technologies. Consequently, wealthy countries are viewed differently from poor countries towards technological advantages. Ordinarily, technologies have made the difficult obstacles so much easier than just by hand. Industries have utilized the advanced technologies to provide huge manufacturing productivity. Moreover, Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen have some very compelling reservations within their article, “Our Future Selves”, on the trends
In this chapter of Naked Economics, by Charles Wheelan, he describes many aspects of trade. It begins by showing the capabilities of trade and how it affects everyone as a whole. It makes it so that everyone is better off than normal. To put it into perspective, he put the image in your head of how hard your life would be without trade, you would have to make your own clothes, find a way to get/make your own food, make your own car, etc... After showing some of the advantages to trade, he applies it to a global persona and begins to introduce his opinion on how global trade (globalization) makes us richer. One of the key explanations of this point is that trade frees up time in our busy schedule, therefore allowing us to use that freed up
As you can see, labor and trade are the key importance to modern wealth. Production and trade are not just needed but are essential for a country to survive. Smith makes it ideal for countries to interact and trade. Trade means you get more directs workers into jobs in which they have a comparative advantage, which means more
...nd again resulting in creation of bigger markets and pulling large competitors and creating new job opportunities, but the problem is with undefined factors like outsourcing, lack of skill development in respect with technology advancement. Technology advancement may be causing huge impact on employment but it is also making human living better. Technology as became part and parcel of our life so we can’t think of life without technology, but to make sure that the same does not harm our livelihood we should keep in track and sharpen and hone our skills with advancement of technology. (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2011)
Smith's Influential work, The Wealth of Nations, was written based on the help with the country’s economy who bases it off his book. Smith’s book was mainly written on how inefficient mercantilism was...
Mokyr, Joel. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. Oxford University Press, 1990.
The U.S. industries have been outsourcing manufacturing for several decades now. U.S. companies thought they were reducing costs by outsourcing development, manufacturing, and process-engineering abilities. Consequently, U.S. corporations’ knowledge, skilled workers, and supply chain, which are the necessities to producing advanced products, have vanished. For example, almost all notebook computers, cell phones, and handheld devices, which were once created in the U.S., are now designed in Asia. When a major U.S. company outsource, it pressures their rivals to do the same thing. They also lose the expertise of process engineering, which would interact with manufacturing on a daily basis. Minor companies and skilled workers go to where the jobs and knowledge networks are no matter where they are geographically in the world. This decline of trade in the U.S. has caused a negative chain reaction to their suppliers of sophisticated materials, tools, production equipment, and components. U.S. industries do not have a way of coming up with new ideas for the next generation of high-tech products...
The Law of Comparative Advantage was introduced by David Ricardo in 1817 in his book ‘Principles of Political Economy and Taxation’. According to this classical theory, a comparative advantage exists for a country when it has a margin of superiority in the production of a certain commodity over others. Comparative advantage results from differing endowments in the factors of production like technology, natural endowments, climate, etc. among different countries. Therefore, each country exports the commodities which it can produce at a lower opportunity cost or, in other words, lower marginal cost of production and imports the rest. This would ultimately be beneficial for all countries engaging in free trade as each would gain through its specialization
David Ricardo was a leading economist in the 1800s. Ricardo was a leading advocate of free trade. Adam Smith was also an advocate of free trade. Smith was more confident than Ricardo that the ability of a market economy's potential could benefit society. (Carbaugh, 2009). Ricardo felt that a countries government should not meddle in free trade and could hinder free trade instead of help it. Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage has been used by economists for years. The law of comparative advantage states that the citizens of each nation can gain by spending more of their time and resources doing those things in which they have a relative advantage (Carbaugh, 2009, p12). What this means is that one needs to determine whether the production of a goods or service is done more economically either domestically or abroad. Even if one country has the advantage in all situations, both countries can still benefit. The theory states that the less efficient nation should specialize in and e...
In order for any country to survive in comparison to another developed country they must be able to grow and sustain a healthy and flourishing economy. This paper is designed to give a detailed insight of economic growth and the sectors that influence economic growth. Economic growth in a country is essential to the reduction of poverty, without such reduction; poverty would continue to increase therefore economic growth is inevitable. Through economic growth, it is also an aid in the reduction of the unemployment rate and it also helps to reduce the budget deficit of the government. Economic growth can also encourage better living standards for all it is citizens because with economic growth there are improvements in the public sectors, educational and healthcare facilities. Through economic growth social spending can also be increased without an increase of taxes.
The focus of this paper will be on using quantitatively analysing innovation’s effect on economic development and country-wise prospects of future growth
However, despite the long-term economic growth, technological progress is very important, and even if we...
...given its imperfections, until a groundbreaking theory is developed that supplants some of the inefficiencies of free trade.
A new era of development was growing to a second industrial revolution with improved technology and better economic prospects large scale manufacturing of machine tools and machinery in factories increased as well as the means to do so became available.
Ever since the Industrial Revolution (1780s), the impact of technology has been subject to public debate over its effect on employment – does it cause unemployment or does it underlie the huge increases in standards of living (Jones 1996, p.11)? While it is difficult to ascertain the relationship between technology and employment, all that can be said with any certainty is that technological advancement has the capacity to create revolutionary economic and social changes (Jones 1996, p.21). In order to provide a clear analysis of the impact of technology on employment, we need to take into account the consequences of technological transitions and seek to relate these to social, economic, political, and cultural factors occurring at the time.