Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Structuralism and others in psychology
Structuralism and others in psychology
Essay on structuralism as a school of thought
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Structuralism and others in psychology
Structuralism- A system of psychology originally advocated by William Wundt, to identify the components of the mind. E.B. Titchener, a student and follower of Wundt, translated material brought from Germany to the United States. While he claimed it was Wundt’s material, his translations were drastically different, misrepresented even, from those ideas originally formed by Wundt. Structuralism to Wundt was organization of consciousness of the mind; furthermore, the mind could voluntarily order and organize mental elements. The term introspection, coined by Wundt, was used as the method of understanding the conscious mind by researchers (K. Cherry, n.d.). In direct opposition, Titchener was more focused on the mechanical linking of elements …show more content…
One key theme in functionalism is that the brain is much like a computer. It sits neutral until data is input and then produces behaviors accordingly, depending on environmental influences. The concept has three main focuses (Schultz, 2011). The first is to determine how it operates, what it achieves, and by which environmental conditions the mind operates and what it achieves as it does. The second focus states that because there is a conscious, there must be some function behind it. It has to provide some type of service for the being; Functionalists needed to know what the specific mental process was and how it was performing, for example- the ability to judge and an individual willing something to happen. Functional psychology has a third and final major concept- the mind and body relationship. It assumes there is an uninhibited current of information flowing from one to the other and looks for no real discrepancy between the two. Functionalism was very influential in the education system; Frances Galton was one of the first to suggest that children be studied early in life to determine what type of independent education plan they required, according to their aptitudes (Shultz, …show more content…
The idea is that the focus is on the experience as a whole instead of its individual parts. The Phi Phenomenon says that people perceive motion when there is no motion. Lights that are side by side and blink, one after the other, look as if they are moving, but are actually only blinking quickly in succession; this is an example of the Phi Phenomenon. There are six basic principles of perceptual organization: proximity, continuity, similarity, closure, simplicity, and figure/ground (Schultz, 2011). Gestalt Psychologists believe that when parts, such as puzzle pieces, are combined, the whole (a complete picture) is different than the parts. When you move them all together, you create something different or greater than the sum of the individual pieces. This concept is in direct opposition of the concept of introspection, suggested by Wundt, that believes in
Jaegwon Kim thinks that multiple realizability of mental properties would bring about the conclusion that psychology is most likely not a science. Several functionalists, specially, Fodor, take up the opposing stance to Kim, supporting that the multiple realizability of mental states is one of the reasons why psychology is an autonomous and justifiable science. Essentially, Kim think that in order for mental states to be multiply realizable then psychology must be fundamentally broken; with human psycho...
Ned Block in Troubles with Functionalism offers his Absent Qualia Argument. The argument provides a counter example to functionalism. The essential aspect to the functional theory of mind defines mentality in terms of its functional states of a system. The functional states of a system match states according to their inputs, outputs, and internal states. Block’s counter example argues for the possibility of two systems to have the same functional states which determines their functional equivalence. In addition to functional equivalence, the two systems have distinguishable mental states. If functionalism is as adequate account of mentality, then functional equivalence entails mental state equivalence. Block argues against the consequent of
The theory is built around two fundamental concepts. The concept of the self, subjective image of ourselves, and the body, or organized completely.
Wiley Backe, A. (2001). John Dewey and early Chicago functionalism. History of Psychology. 4(4), 323-340. Retrieved from PsycARTICLES 3, February 2010.
Functionalism is the doctrine that what makes something a thought, desire, pain (or any other type of mental state) depends not on its internal constitution, but solely on its function, or the role it plays, in the cognitive system of which it is a part. More precisely, functionalist theories take the identity of a mental state to be determined by its causal relations to sensory stimulations, other mental states, and
Titchener, who was a one student of Wundt, on the other hand, described his system as structuralism, which involves the analysis of the structure of the mind. Tichener broke down consciousness into elemental feelings and sensations. Wundt held the belief that consciousness was vital in scientific psychology, thus dependent on structuralism. He used introspection to study the functions of the mind occurring in active experience. It is however, imperative to note that Wundt’s introspection could not be used to establish higher functions of the mind. He divided the active experiences as feelings and sensations (Titchener, 1915).
Functionalism is the doctrine that what makes up a particular mental state doesn’t depend on the what it’s made with or how it’s built, but the way it functions or the role it plays within its system. They say that mental states are defined by functional roles and mental kinds are functional kinds. They say that things with minds are just things put together in the right way. As long as something can play the ‘functional role’ that defines, pain for example, then that thing has pains.
In 1929, Marc Bloch and Lucien Febvre founded the journal, ‘Annales d’historie économique et sociale’. This journal became a rallying point for reform minded historians. These liberal historians believed that if historians were to understand the past they must diverge into other disciplines. The Annales School’s relationship with sociology has often been mentioned specifically in relation the sociological concepts of structuralism and post-structuralism. Both, are very important concepts in the academic discipline of sociology. Structuralism being the belief that our lives are not random but structured by certain regularities that shape our lives.
Functionalism is a materialist stance in the philosophy of mind that argues that mental states are purely functional, and thus categorized by their input and output associations and causes, rather than by the physical makeup that constitutes its parts. In this manner, functionalism argues that as long as something operates as a conscious entity, then it is conscious. Block describes functionalism, discusses its inherent dilemmas, and then discusses a more scientifically-driven counter solution called psychofunctionalism and its failings as well. Although Block’s assertions are cogent and well-presented, the psychofunctionalist is able to provide counterarguments to support his viewpoint against Block’s criticisms. I shall argue that though both concepts are not without issue, functionalism appears to satisfy a more acceptable description that philosophers can admit over psychofunctionalism’s chauvinistic disposition that attempts to limit consciousness only to the human race.
Talcott Parson and Robert Merton are the central tenets of structural-functionalist. According to Calhoun “Functionalism (sometime called “structural –functionalism’) refers to the body of theory first developed in the 1930s and 1940s that treats society as a set of interdependent system. Theory rest on an organic analogy that likens a social system to a physical body, in which each subsystem is necessary to maintain the proper functioning of the entire organism. From a functionalist point of view, the key to understanding a social subsystem is thus to trace its function in the working of the whole.”(calhoun489) Structural functional theory describes society to be a complex system with various interdependent parts that work together to maintain stability. Each part of society has each of which have their own functions and work hand in hand to maintain social stability in the world.
Structural Functionalism or what I call just functionalism, is just another theory that has society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. This approach looks at society through the macro-level of orientation, which is a broad focus on the social structures that shape society as a whole, and believes that society has evolved like organisms. This approach looks at both social structure and the social functions. Functionalism has society as a whole in terms of the function of its constituent elements; namely norms and customs, traditions, and institutions. There is a common analogy, popularized by Herbert Spencer that presents these parts of society as "organs" that works towards the proper functioning of the "body" as a whole. In the most basic terms, it simply emphasizes "the effort to impute and the rigorously as possible, to each feature, custom, or even practice the effect on the functioning of a supposedly stable and cohesive system.
The most concise way to characterize Gestalt psychology is to say that it deals with wholes and its given data are what have been called phenomena. It is because of their strong phenomenological orientation, which explains that wholes are experienced by conscious man and not in parts. For example, in perceiving a melody one gets a melodic form, not a string or a note, a unitary whole that is something more important than the total list of its parts. This is the way experience comes to man, organizing it into significant structured form.
The way people feel and act towards something or someone is from their previous experiences and their mental states. The definition of functionalism is what makes something a desire, pain, and a thought, but you cannot think, desire, or feel pain without a physical experience with it. In conclusion, my objection is lack of experience towards Putnam’s theory of functionalism. Putnam and Jackson’s theory, both have great arguments, but Jackson’s objection towards Putnam’s theory raises questions about his theory. The questions that it raises are, “How can experience not change a person? Did Putnam think that people's mental state never change through their experiences?” I do believe that functionalism can provide a complete account of the nature of mind, but Putnam has minor flaws in his theory that has to do with experience. I agree with Putnam that all functional states are mental states and if you're in pain, it does not mean that your brain is in pain, but I also believe that our experiences lead us to our thoughts, desires, and pains and that are what makes people behave the way that they do. I have proved my thesis by showing the reader both sides of the argument and showing where their theories clash together. My objection was to show that experience and functionalism are somehow connected, and without experience it will be difficult to understand what functionalism
Psychology started, and had a long history, as a topic within the fields of philosophy and physiology. It then became an independent field of its own through the work of the German Wilhelm Wundt, the founder of experimental psychology and structuralism. Wundt stressed the use of scientific methods in psychology, particularly through the use of introspection. In 1875, a room was set-aside for Wundt for demonstrations in what we now call sensation and perception. This is the same year that William James set up a similar lab at Harvard. Wilhelm Wundt and William James are usually thought of as the fathers of psychology, as well as the founders of psychology?s first two great ?schools? Structuralism and Functionalism. Psychologist Edward B Titchner said; ?to study the brain and the unconscious we should break it into its structural elements, after that we can construct it into a whole and understand what it does.? (psicafe.com)
Psychology is the study of the mind, its biology, and behavior if the individual. The father of psychology, Wilhelm Wundt, used objective measurement and controlled analyzing to find and emphasize separation between psychology and philosophy (McLeod). Wundt opened the Institute for Experimental Psychology at the University of Leipzig in Germany in 1879, using his background in physiology to study reactions and sensations (McLeod). There is no doubt that he, along with the later help of Sigmund Freud, launched what is now modern psychology. Psychology and its research helped the world understand the inner workings of the mind and how it affects everyone around us.