Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Diversity in the classroom is not limited to abilities
Importance of academic success
Diversity in the classroom is not limited to abilities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how slow.” (Plato) The reason I chose the quote above was because I believe it is talking about not discouraging anyone academically, physically and mentally. I feel like there are so many children who have special needs that get discouraged by so many people. Children and adults who have a disability are marginalized by many people. There are multiple people that I have seen stare at someone with special needs like they are not even human. When someone looks at someone the way I have seen some people look at them, it breaks my heart. Every person has feelings, who cares what they look like, what color they are, or their race. Anyone can do anything they want if they put their …show more content…
Students who have special needs get to socialize with students who do not have a disability or even the same disability as them. In the article, Special needs programs and schools: a primer, Dwight states, “Some studies have found that including children with disabilities in the regular classrooms have better outcome for both students with and without disabilities.” (para 22) I believe that having students in a mainstream classroom their education can be better because they are in a room with different types of learners, they get to attend a regular class, and also for small children their excitement for school is unreal. Some problems with special needs students being in a mainstream classroom is that they do not receive as much one-on-one attention as some students may need. The student-to-teacher ratio in the classroom is usually one teacher to twenty students. The teacher has to keep his/her pace the same and cannot slow down for some students who need a slower pace, and will probably need to be re-taught or may fall behind. Another big issue with special needs students being in a mainstream classroom is most teachers are not going to be trained to teach students with special needs. In my high school experience since some teachers were not trained to teach student who have a disability, the school provides an aid to be in the classroom with the student. The aid being in …show more content…
In the article, Do Special Education Students Fare Better in Pull-Outs or Full Inclusion Classes? Marie Anderson says, “Pull-out classes may offer the best of both worlds for some special education students.” (para 4) I think that the students with special needs do get the best of both worlds with being in both classrooms. The students are receiving the education courses like their peers but are getting the extra help they need. Some downfalls are that when the students are leaving the classroom they may disrupt the class or may get embarrassed that they have to leave. When the students get pulled-out of class by someone or the school announces their name over the intercom for them to go another class, they have to take the “walk-of-shame.” No students likes the feeling of being stereotyped by their peers. I think that in the lower grades they are not stereotyped as much as in junior high or high school. In my education I have seen some students laugh at the students who are getting pulled from the regular class. I think that the teachers should not announce that they students need to leave to go to their other class but for the students to get up and leave when it is the time. In my high school experience I A+ for students who were in Title Math and me and the aid teacher would walk by the
Disability in our day in age is seen as being worse than death. People with disabilities should not feel like they don 't belong. They are just like everyone else and want to be treated like everyone else. Many without disabilities think that it can be contagious and stray to even look at people with disability. This is not the case for it 's not contagious and one should not be seen as a different person just because of their disability. They didn 't choose that life and shouldn 't be mistreated for what they are. “People with disability should be treated equally to everyone else.”
Kathie Snow believed that other people’s attitude towards others is the greatest obstacle facing people with disabilities. According to Kathie Snow (2010), “The real problem is never a person’s disability, but the attitudes of others! A change in our attitudes leads to changes in our actions. Attitudes drive actions” (P. 2). I completely agree with Kathie Snow in this regard because this is more than just language; it is the attitudes we have towards
Disproportionality, in special education, is the overrepresentation or under-representation of a particular population or demographic group relative to their presence in the overall student population (Ralabate, & Klotz, 2007). There are many factors thought to contribute to disproportionality: cultural differences, lack of appropriate assessment strategies, socioeconomic status, race, and gender (Kanaitsa, 2010).
Kauffman brings up an excellent point, why isn’t the government comparing children that receive special education to those children who don’t receive special education. Wouldn’t it make sense to compare two things that are similar instead of trying to compare two things that are no way alike? Why don’t we focus on making special education as good as it can be? We should work to make sure students with disabilities learn everything they can at their own speed in special education (Kauffman, 2003 p. 3). Not scraping the whole system. Basically general education students are the wrong comparison to determine if the special education system is working or not. “The PCESE asked the wrong question and suggested dedicating ourselves to closing the wrong gap. Their approach is about as helpful as dedicating ourselves to closing the gap between 5 and 7” (Kauffman, 2003 p. 3).
What do we do with children with disabilities in the public school? Do we include them in the general education class with the “regular” learning population or do we separate them to learn in a special environment more suited to their needs? The problem is many people have argued what is most effective, full inclusion where students with all ranges of disabilities are included in regular education classes for the entire day, or partial inclusion where children spend part of their day in a regular education setting and the rest of the day in a special education or resource class for the opportunity to work in a smaller group setting on specific needs. The need for care for children with identified disabilities both physical and learning continues to grow and the controversy continues.
Done correctly, mainstreaming does not mean simply placing the child into a classroom of regular students and expecting him to succeed on his own. Instead, it takes extra help to integrate autistic children into a mainstreamed environment because the others in the classroom are more socially motivated, whereas the child is more instinctively and structurally motivated (Siegel 226). With the help and constant support of special aids within the classroom, a child with autistic disorders has a better chance of succeeding because they are around children who will encourage proper behavior and social skills.
The true purpose of school is to prepare children for their future in becoming lifelong learners and global citizens. For children with special needs, special education services prepare and provide support for them in dealing with the challenges they face daily. Laws such as Individuals with Disabilities Education Act has enforced schools to provide education to all children and reinforces the purpose of the school, which is to provide children the Least Restrictive Environment to help them develop to their optimal potential. There are myriad of concerns regarding inclusion’s effect on typical developing students, yet a research done by Bui, Quirk, Almazan, and Valenti shows that “[p]resence of students with disabilities results in greater number of typical students making reading and math progress compared to non-inclusive general education classes” (p. 3). Therefore, inclusion not only benefits children with disabilities, but it also benefits typical developing student’s academic skills and allows them to learn acceptance and respect for students with disabilities.
I have been a Special Education Para-Educator for eleven years now. My decision to do this was based on the needs of my family and kids. When my last child was born, the doctors did not think that he would make it. He had a heart malfunction and was born with RSV and Von Villibrantds disease (which I did not find out until he was three); those factors lead me to want to work with special education kids, knowing that I could make a difference.
Hearing-impaired and deaf students can better succeed in life when educated in mainstream schools than being segregated in special schools because though they have special needs, they learn to communicate better with hearing individuals and can still attend special programs where teachers with special training can help them in their educational journey.
How did it start? Mainstreaming classes are regular classrooms with special needs students in the class with them. Mainstream schools and classes are chances for students with a special need to be with other children their age with no aid or special needs. These schools give children with Autism a feeling of what it is like not to have a special need.
My paper focuses on how students with intellectual or behavioral disabilities are placed in less-integrated classrooms. This is important because the placement of students affects their social and academic success. Students who require special education are usually pulled out of general education classrooms or placed in less-integrated groups in order to receive accommodations, despite research showing that this harms their social and academic skills, barring students with severe disabilities who require full-time care. I will reference A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Placement on Academic and Social Skill Outcome Measures of Students with Disabilities by Oh-Young and Filler where they theorize that academic and social inequalities between students with special needs and students in general education classes exist because of the placement of special needs students into less-integrated classrooms.
Traditionally children with disabilities would have been segregated in special schools, classes or institutions depending on the severity of their disability. These schools would be tailored to disabled people’s needs and would have staff employed to education these children at their own pace. There was seen to be many benefits to having segregated schools both for economic reasons but it was believed that it would have a positive effect on both disabled and non-disabled students. One of the economic advantages is that specialist equipment can be brought into one ‘special school’ and specialist teachers like speech therapists and physiotherapists can be used under one roof instead of little equipment in lots of mainstream schools. Another advantage perceived from having ‘special schools’ was that the students would benefit from having smaller classes. Jenkinson (1997:11) suggests that segregated school are “more supportive and less threatening” for disabled students, and the disabled students are able to build self-esteem as they don’t need to compare themselves against more able students within a mainstream school. Dunn (1968) argues against any benefits of segregation as he suggests that the only benefits from segregated schools is of the teachers and students within these schools as he states that it “relives class teachers of the need to diverse and implement curricula for students who appeared unable to learn from normal instructions in regular class”. And then goes onto state that teachers can “devote their efforts to the majority of students who did not have learning problems.”
In regards to the students grades in their content classes, “students with LD served in inclusive classrooms earned significantly higher grades in all four areas of academic instruction” (Rae et al. 2002). When the results of the state proficiency test were reviewed, it was noted that there was no significant difference between students with a specific learning disability receiving instruction in an inclusive classroom or pull out classroom. Lastly, students that were receiving instruction in an inclusive classroom, scored higher on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills than students who were receiving their instruction in a pull out program for both reading and math. At the conclusion of the study with students at the middle school age, “this study clearly demonstrated that students with disabilities included in general education classrooms achieved better outcomes on some measure than did their peers in pullout programs and comparable outcomes on others” (Rae et al.
A child with a mental or physical disability may not be able to think, work, play, and function like other children of the same age. Someone working in the special needs career will be able to assist these children to function in their everyday lives and to meet goals to encourage them to thrive. In order for someone to work with special needs children, they need to understand the factors involved in a child’s improvement, have a heart for helping others, and be properly educated and trained.
Special Education is the education of students with special needs in a way that addresses the students’ individual differences and needs. And it is a specially designed instruction that meets the needs of students with disabilities as they attend to school, it also includes related services and supplementary aids and services. It helps every student with disabilities to have a chance to learn and showcase their own talent and intelligence. Without these students, Special Education wouldn’t be an organization or community who are willing to help these students with disabilities to learn and to attain their needs.