Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Relations Between Religion and Science
Comparing between religion and science
Comparing between religion and science
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Relations Between Religion and Science
Kurt Vonnegut’s Cat’s Cradle is a novel showing the effortless dissolve of the world if we live by science or religion alone. Albert Einstein said, “All religions, arts, and sciences are branches of the same tree.” From the beginning of the novel the author is saying that religion is all made of lies, but lies are the tree from which religion, as well as science, stem from. This novel plays with the idea of creating and inventing. Through innovation, mishap, and ultimately failure science and religion become one in Cat’s Cradle. Within the novel, both science and religion are created in an attempt to discover some type of truth about the world by the inventions made within them. The main character takes us through his research, in order for …show more content…
Cat’s Cradle consists of mishaps that contain an outcome of an increase in popularization of a religion or creating something quite deadly. In Vonnegut’s novel he relates science and religion more than is seen just at the surface. Dr. Felix Hoenikker invented the atomic bomb, an invention meant to destroy, but his process of inventing is one to wonder about. This novel displays the inventions as a mishap. Ice- nine was deadly, but an accident because Hoenikker was toying around with different chemicals. He did the same with games in his office while constructing the atomic bomb (e.g., cat’s cradle). Dr. Hoenikker played around with toys and wouldn’t build the atomic bomb. Newt says in his letter, “Father got so interested in turtles that he stopped working on the atom bomb…So one night they [People from the Manhattan Project] went into his laboratory and stole the turtles and the aquarium” (16). His distraction was taken away and made him focus on the only thing that was left, the atomic bomb. The destructive bomb was created by and magic is used to describe the science behind it and any other invention by Dr. Hoenikker. Magic is a word most scientists would not use because it implies illusion. Illusion may be the word Vonnegut is describing is science; “They looked upon him as a sort of magician who could make America invincible with a wave of …show more content…
Ice-nine, although fully created and complete in its specified function, creates a problem that turns the world into chaos. The difficulty with ice-nine is once Papa Monzano takes the ice-nine another person (The Doctor) ends up dead within no time. That would be fine if it only affected two people, but Monzano’s body falls into the ocean freezing water everywhere. After everything is frozen religion comes in. The residue left behind by ice-nine can kill any living organism. In the middle of the, what looks to be arranged, bodies is a note signed by Bokonon himself. The note
Rubin explain through his journal on how the religion and environmental have impact people around the world. Rubin describe how there are less religion war and human conflict because of the universal religion; people only believe that god is the creator of the universe and created everything on earth. On the other hand, the scientist are not interested in religion at all because they don’t meet the bais of sciences. Science can’t answer some of the question like, who created the world?, and does god existence or not? However, both the environmental and religion have a belief system creation stories and original sin. In religion, there was a beginning when god created the world and made human. The first human were Adam and Eve. However, the scientist think that the human came from the generation of monkey. The scientist do test and comparison to come up with this ideal. They compare the monkey head to a human skeleton and monkey skeleton to support their idea. They are co-exit based on faith because if they were to co-exist on reason there would be a lots of problem. For example the best solution for global warming was to get rid of nuclear
Stanley Kramer's film, Inherit the Wind, examines a trial based on the 1925 Scopes trial in Dayton, Tennessee. Often referred to as "The Trial of the Century" (Scopes Trial Web Page), the Scopes trial illuminated the controversy between the Christian theory of creation and the more scientific theory of evolution. John Scopes, a high school biology teacher, was arrested for illegally teaching evolutionism to his class. "The meaning of the trial emerged because it was seen as a conflict of social and intellectual values" (Scopes Trial Web Page). Kramer's film dramatizes this conflict between the Christian believers and the evolutionists in "Hillsboro, heavenly Hillsboro, the buckle on the Bible belt" (Inherit the Wind). Prosecutor Matthew Brady represents the values of fundamental Christianity while defense attorney Henry Drummond is the voice of reason and science. Although the two men have been good friends and partners in the past, the case in Hillsboro illuminates the difference in their values. Through the scene on the porch with Matthew Brady and Henry Drummond, director Stanley Kramer illustrates the incessant tug-of-war between religion and science. More specifically, camera angle and Drummond's metaphor of the "Golden Dancer" help deliver Kramer's belief in evolutionism.
Cat's Cradle is full of these kinds of "poisons" not only about religion and science, but also about many other human frailties as well. In a way, Vonnegut is holding a mirror (that hides no imperfections) up to humanity in order that humanity might see its own the folly and futility and thus be impelled to try and improve. I think Vonnegut's hope is that this book will allow people to laugh at themselves while also making them think about how they are directing their own lives.
In Cat’s Cradle, Vonnegut invents a religion based on lies, called Bokononism. It tells that all of humanity are unknowingly organized into teams, called karass, that do God’s will and don’t ever discover what they are doing. These karass revolve around a wampeter, an object that guides the people t...
Kurt Vonnegut’s fictional novel “Cat’s Cradle”, indirectly explores issues that parallels into topics such as religion, scientific/technological advancements, political power and much more. Vonnegut’s novel is narrated by a character named Jonah (John). He, Jonah, sets out to write an anthropological book based off of what key people were doing on the day that the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. Throughout Vonnegut’s novel it can clearly represents how a writer can become a very destructive person to society. As for this novel, it shows through the uses of parallels that a writer can become a very destructive person to society, these parallels are reflects to real world issues throughout his novel to show this claim, that a writer too can be a destructive person to society.
Through the portrayal of Felix Hoenniker, Vonnegut satirizes that innocence does not necessarily equal harmlessness. In chapter 7, Newton Hoenniker writes about his father to Jonah, “After the thing went off, after it was a sure thing that America could wipe out a city with just one bomb, a scientist turned to Father and said, ‘Science has now known sin.’ And do you know what Father said? He said, ‘What is sin?’ (13). Felix’s ignorance toward the moral responsibility that accompanied his nuclear weapons research become blatant. Furthermore, Felix’s lack of judiciousness emblematizes his shallowness. Integrating such a concept promptly fills Vonnegut’s intentions of illustrating the destructive nature of innocence. The author elicits that impeccability found in Felix Hoenniker can be deleterious. In order to understand how these circumstances lead to a worldwide disaster by the end of Cat’s Cradle, it is of paramount importance that one conceives Felix as the epitome of a scientist who researches for knowledge with little or no concern for the application of that knowledge. In chapter 33, ...
Cat's Cradle is, "Vonnegut's most highly praised novel. Filled with humor and unforgettable characters, this apocalyptic story tells of Earth's ultimate end, and presents a vision of the future that is both darkly fantastic and funny, as Vonnegut weaves a satirical commentary on modern man and his madness" (Barnes and Noble n.pag). In Cat's Cradle, Kurt Vonnegut uses satire as a vehicle for threatened self-destruction when he designs the government of San Lorenzo. In addition, the Bokonists practice of Boko-maru, and if the world is going to end in total self destruction and ruin, then people will die, no matter how good people are and what religion people believe.
Nathaniel Hawthorns short stories, such as, Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment, Rappaccini’s Daughter and The Birthmark all have an underlying meaning and demonstrate a similar recurring theme. Hawthorne uses his stories to clarify his beliefs on the competition between nature, religion, and science in everyday life. In all three of his short stories he refuses the concept of science coming before religion or nature. Hawthorne clearly thought if nature or religion was tampered with using science it could only end badly, but more specifically with death. In each of his stories there is a scientific experiment that defies both nature and religion ending harmfully. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s beliefs conclude that God and nature to ultimately be more powerful then science.
Plantinga, Alvin, "Religion and Science", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = .
With Darwin's Origin of Species to Strauss's Life of Jesus being introduced within the nineteenth century, many questioned the true meaning and significance of the Bible (J.C.D. Clark). These ideas of evolution challenged the power of the church, and “secularization is inevitable for christianity” (Heyck). People were distancing themselves from religion as a result of the new discoveries. According to Brian Harrison, he proclaims, “While christianity is slowly losing cultural significance, new scientific discoveries flourishes immensely.” The deliberation between religion and science can be seen in the novel The War of the Worlds, with the Martians representing scientific discoveries and the curate representing the original ideas of christianity and religion. When the narrator first runs into the curate, the curate could only focus on the flames in the distance, and the flames represent the eternal punishment the curate is fearful of. The curate believes the Martian’s invasion is the result of God’s punishment, asserting that "It is just. On me and mine be the punishment laid. We have sinned, we have fallen short (Wells 221; 2.4).” The curate openly accepts the punishment as a result of his society distancing themselves from God. He argues that the Martians were sent as
“The lack of conflict between science and religion arises from a lack of overlap between their respective domains of professional expertise—science in the empirical constitution of the universe, and religion in the search for proper ethical values and the spiritual meaning of our lives. The attainment of wisdom in a full life requires extensive attention to both domains—for a great book tells us that the truth can make us free and that we will live in optimal harmony with our fellows when we learn to do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly.”
Technology and belief have a great deal to do in making a good science fiction novel. Frank Herbert's Dune and Isaac Asimov's Foundation Series give excellent examples of this. Belief systems are defined as religious beliefs in a society. Technology is defined as the level of science achieved in a society. These two factors play separate roles in a society. Yet, at times, they fall into the same categories like in the book Dune where science reflects religious aspects or in Foundation where the society depends on religion and social behavior to survive the onslaught of advanced technology. Religion might be a fuel to achieve a specific level of technology. Such as in the Bible, "Seek and you shall find." May mean that God wants all Christians to achieve the highest amount of experience that they are capable of. Religion gives an individual, morals and control, while science gives an individual the medium under which he can explore the hidden. Dune is a fine example that shows the mingling of religion and science and how it affects the individual or society.
...wever, in the best interest of advancing education and an enlightened society, science must be pursued outside of the realm of faith and religion. There are obvious faith-based and untestable aspects of religion, but to interfere and cross over into everyday affairs of knowledge should not occur in the informational age. This overbearing aspect of the Church’s influence was put in check with the scientific era, and the Scientific Revolution in a sense established the facet of logic in society, which allows us to not only live more efficiently, but intelligently as well. It should not take away from the faith aspect of religion, but serve to enhance it.
At first glance, many facets of science and religion seem to be in direct conflict with each other. Because of this, I have generally kept them confined to separate spheres in my life. I have always thought that science is based on reason and cold, hard facts and is, therefore, objective. New ideas have to be proven many times by different people to be accepted by the wider scientific community, data and observations are taken with extreme precision, and through journal publications and papers, scientists are held accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work. All of these factors contributed to my view of science as objective and completely truthful. Religion, on the other hand, always seems fairly subjective. Each person has their own personal relationship with God, and even though people often worship as a larger community with common core beliefs, it is fine for one person’s understanding of the Bible and God to be different from another’s. Another reason that Christianity seems so subjective is that it is centered around God, but we cannot rationally prove that He actually exists (nor is obtaining this proof of great interest to most Christians). There are also more concrete clashes, such as Genesis versus the big bang theory, evolution versus creationism, and the finality of death versus the Resurrection that led me to separate science and religion in my life. Upon closer examination, though, many of these apparent differences between science and Christianity disappeared or could at least be reconciled. After studying them more in depth, science and Christianity both seem less rigid and inflexible. It is now clear that intertwined with the data, logic, and laws of scien...
Stenmark, Mickael. How to Relate Science and Religion. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2004.