The Importance Of Participatory Architecture

1127 Words3 Pages

"Nobody is against participation because it is good for you" - An analysis of the roles of those in power within participatory architecture. The notion of 'participatory architecture' is, in theory, nothing to oppose. "Nobody is against it because it is good for you" (Arnstein, 1969, p216). Participation is the calculated inclusion of the intended users of a building within some stages of its design process, a rarely contested idea. Yet how can an idea so intrinsically beneficial to society be simultaneously discriminatory to the communities in which the powerful seek to collaborate. Participation in recent years has become somewhat a token for egalitarianism through architectural development, whilst ignoring the crucial social implications …show more content…

It is undisputable that there are mixed opinions on the topic of participation, Sherry, R Arnstein expresses suspicion in her views on the subject in her widely recognised article 'The Ladder of Citizen Participation', questioning both government and institutional plausibility in their acts regarding citizen participation. Arnstein also highlights that participation is a euphemism for 'citizen power' and describes it as an 'empty ritual' (Arnstein, 1969, p216), suggesting that participation is used within societies in order for those in power to gain more control over the citizenry, merely using participation as a veil for dominating the frustrated minority groups. The 'ladder' was one of the first attempts at classifying different methods of participation into a grading system, the 8 'rungs' of the ladder of participation, (Manipulation, Therapy, Informing, Consultation, Placation, Partnership, Delegated power and Citizen Control), revolutionising the subsequent theories regarding participation within the built environment. The theories Arnstein produced have remained transcendent, even in today's society. Socioeconomic prejudice remains rife, and the themes …show more content…

This, however, can suggest that citizens of a lower financial standing can be effectively 'bought out', or 'manipulated' (Arnstein, 1969) into a decision. It is also possible that providing incentives for participation could impair genuine judgement, through creating bias towards the incentive holders. Although the article is not specifically architectural, the ideas regarding the involvement of users in the design process are still relevant, and a wide range of theories can be considered to assist further research. To summarise, it is evident that power plays an important role in participatory architecture and should be met with suspicion. On one hand it allows those in power to further assert their dominance over those they are posing to help, be that through expert knowledge, financial standing or social views. On the other hand it also allows the powerless to practice their democratic rights, and have a voice in the development of their built environment. To further my research I am going to assess the social responsibility of architects and how this can change in order to hear the "voices of ordinary people" (Billig, 1988, p162) and address the crucial social issues of our time. It may be beneficial to analyse interviews of architects to understand their opinions to a participatory

Open Document