Essay On Pck

1389 Words3 Pages

Under any circumstances, teachers’ knowledge helps teaching occur and central to any teaching endeavour is children’s learning. Researchers have been into earnest works seeking the aspects of mathematics teachers’ knowledge which would contribute to effective teaching and learning. Take Bass (2010) as for one who claimed that having mathematical knowledge, teachers should be able to present mathematical concepts to students in understandable form. In this vein also Fennena (2010) stressed that what mathematics teachers know limits what is done in their classrooms and ultimately what their students learn. Moreover, Mewborn (2011) expanded that because of this limiting effect of teachers’ knowledge to child’s learning, teachers must not only …show more content…

He added that PCK includes an understanding of what makes the learning of specific topics easy or difficult, the conceptions and preconceptions that students of different ages and background bring with them to the learning of those most frequently taught topics and lessons. He later elaborated that it is that special blending of knowledge into an understanding of …show more content…

Hill argued that PCK in mathematics includes knowledge and skills through mathematics education, knowledge of using alternatives to solve problems, knowledge of demonstrating representations, knowledge of articulating mathematical explanations, knowledge of anticipating what students are likely to think about the tasks chosen, and knowledge to analyse errors. As an aftermath, Hill reconceptualised PCK in mathematics as Mathematical Knowledge of Teaching (MKT). Furthermore, over the years since the time of Shulman, PCK have been viewed dynamically. It has been described as “elusive butterfly” because it is a construct of knowledge not amenable to static representation (Schneider, 2011). As for the purpose of this study, it was decided to narrow down to 4 manageable aspects of PCK, (1) Teachers’ knowledge of mathematical structure and connections, (2) Teachers’ knowledge of representations of concepts, (3) Teachers’ knowledge of the cognitive demands of mathematical tasks on learners, and (4) Teachers’ knowledge of students misconceptions and choice of

Open Document