Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Violence in literature
Define violence in literature
Violence in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One who is righteous, pure, and ethical obtains a solid moral compass. A lack of morality in an individual results in insanity. This is shown in Timothy Findley’s The Wars; the war corrupts individual’s integrity which ultimately leads to their insanity. Robert Ross and Rodwell depict lunacy as war demoralizes them. As individuals receive commands that violate their virtues, as a repercussion a person will become irrational.
Robert Ross is a pure, righteous, ethical person in the beginning of the novel; he obtains a strong morality. Roberts’ integrity prevails when Mrs. Ross asks Robert to murder Rowena’s rabbits. “Why do the rabbits have to be killed? …I’ll take care of them. Please!!! Robert-control yourself. Silence. Who’s going to kill
…show more content…
Battery Sergeant Major commands Robert to kill a horse on the S.S. Massanabie. “Robert thought of ways of avoiding what had to be done… He began to squeeze the trigger and he squeezed it again and again and again –so many times that when Sergeant -Major pulled him away the gun went right on clicking in his hands” (Findley 68). Participant from seminar one Nora states “This is very unlike Robert, he shares a connection with animals and it is not like him to kill a horse”. Robert’s integrity is corrupt as he joins the war, he is overkilling an animal which whom he shares a strong connection with. The war further demoralizes Robert, as Leather denies his insight to save the horses which pushes Robert to take matters into his own hands. “Robert went inside at one point to request of Captain Leather that he be allowed to take the horses and mules… Captain Leather was adamant in his refusal…All the horses and mules were either dead or were dying…It took him a half-an-hour to kill the mules and horses” (Findley 201-203). Robert loses his sense of sanity as his war strips his morals , resulting in him killing Captain Leather, Cassles and the horses War continues to fraudulently influence Robert’s ethic, as he kills Private Cassles. “Cassles went out –unarmed –to prevent Robert passing… Robert shot him in the face” (Findley 209). Robert shoots Cassles in a last stich effort to save the horses –and his virtue. As Cassles …show more content…
Rodwell alike to Robert also obtains a strong bond for animals, which are a part of his nature. “They’re resting. They’ve all been injured. That’s his sort of hospital you see” (Findley 95). Rodwell deeply cares for animals as the novel depicts he nurses animals back to health. Seminar two participants state “Rodwell cares so deeply because it is in his nature to care for animals, like Robert”. Rodwell’s morals include ensuring the safety of animal life; this is shown as he aids the toads, birds, rabbits, and hedgehogs back to health. The war corrupts Rodwell’s moral as he is sent up the lines were he is encounters madmen. “When Rodwell arrived, he found them slaughtering rats and mice- burning them alive in their cooking fires. Rodwell, being Rodwell, had tried to stop them. They would not be stopped –and, seeing that he took interest, they’d forced him to watch the killing of a cat” (Findley 150). Soldiers compel Rodwell to observe their sadistic actions on a cat as a result going against Rodwell’s nature. Interference of Rodwell’s morals ultimately led to his insanity which urges him to commit suicide. “Rodwell had shot himself…they’d forced him watch the killing of a cat. Half an hour later, Rodwell wandered into No Man’s Land and put a bullet through his ears” (Findley 150). The war corrupts Rodwell’s integrity, by demanding he watch the killing of what he holds dear to him. This ultimately leads to his insanity,
Very early in the novel, Robert’s sister Rowena dies from a fall. Robert takes this accident personally, believing “It was Robert’s fault. Robert was her guardian” (16). Although Robert could have done nothing to prevent Rowena’s death, he takes it very personally and isolates himself from his family. The situation is made worse when his mother demands Robert kill his sister’s pet rabbits simply “Because a girl had died – and her rabbits had outlived her” (21). Although Robert does not kill the rabbits personally, they are killed regardless. Rowena’s rabbits rely on Robert to protect them, much like she relied on him, enhancing Robert’s sense of failure. This initial experience with death causes Robert to escape his previous life by joining the war, an unwise decision considering his initial reaction to death and violence. A similar event occurs while Robert is travelling across the Atlantic Ocean when he is told “one of them horses of yours has gone and broke its leg” (57). Robert is told that he must shoot the horse because “an officer had to do it. They were the only ones with guns” (57). Unlike the killing of the rabbits, Robert is required to kill the horse by himself. Robert displays a strong connection with animals throughout the novel and is appalled at the thought of killing
War has been a constant part of human history. It has greatly affected the lives of people around the world. These effects, however, are extremely detrimental. Soldiers must shoulder extreme stress on the battlefield. Those that cannot mentally overcome these challenges may develop Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Sadly, some resort to suicide to escape their insecurities. Soldiers, however, are not the only ones affected by wars; family members also experience mental hardships when their loved ones are sent to war. Timothy Findley accurately portrays the detrimental effects wars have on individuals in his masterpiece The Wars.
The title of this novel, “The Wars” is illusory. Upon first glance, it makes one expect a protagonist who goes to an actual war, uses physical strength to fight on the battlefield and becomes a war hero.While part of that is true, there are also other significances of the war associated with this title. This novel recounts the journey of the protagonist, Robert Ross as he starts out as a shy, introvert and an inexperienced person before he goes to war; he experiences a change in himself as a result of the people and the battle(s) that he fights with the factors in his surroundings. Therefore, “The Wars” doesn’t necessarily mean the war with the enemy but it includes the wars at home, wars against nature and wars of relationships. Which
With the overwhelming detail, the readers are able to imagine the perfect replication of what Robert is seeing in the story and this allows for the detachment from reality. At the verge of the climax of the story, Robert sees a doe: “he was alone with the [it] in a green world that seemed to cru for rich red, and he did not have time to think; it was enough that he sensed the doe’s quick decision to leave him” and at that moment, “the arrow sliced through the deer” (1670)
Throughout the book, Robert develops a bond with the animals as he lacks connections with the everyday people in his life. Robert’s natural instinct to save but failure to do so is portrayed with horses: “I’m going to break ranks and save ...
Robert Ross’ is introduced to characters with varying outlooks on the world, based on their own social and economic backgrounds. The soldiers around Robert Ross differ greatly,...
Within the article Stephen King continuously states that we humans all have insanity within us. In the article,
According to the Indian Times, madness is the rule in warfare (Hebert). The madness causes a person to struggle with experiences while in the war. In “How to Tell a True War Story”, the madness of the war caused the soldiers to react to certain situations within the environment differently. Tim O’Brien’s goal with the story “How to Tell a True War Story” is to shed light on the madness the soldiers face while in the war. Tim O’Brien tells the true story of Rat experiences of the war changing his life.
The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry is a book by Jon Ronson, where he investigates the idea of psychopathy and the many individuals involved. Psychopathy is defined as “a person who is mentally ill, who does not care about other people, and who is usually dangerous or violent.” Ronson visited mental health professionals and psychopaths in order to determine the right way to control the diagnosis of mental health disorders. Throughout the novel, Ronson focuses on three main themes, which are the definition of madness, unnecessary mental diagnoses and the problem with confirmation bias.
War is a hard thing to describe. It has benefits that can only be reaped through its respective means. Means that, while necessary, are harsh and unforgiving. William James, the author of “The Moral Equivalent of War”, speaks only of the benefits to be had and not of the horrors and sacrifices found in the turbulent times of war. James bears the title of a pacifist, but he heralds war as a necessity for society to exist. In the end of his article, James presents a “war against nature” that would, in his opinion, stand in war’s stead in bringing the proper characteristics to our people. However, my stance is that of opposition to James and his views. I believe that war, while beneficial in various ways, is unnecessary and should be avoided at all costs.
The Struggles in life is something everyone is faced with whether it is physical, emotional mental or personal struggles. These struggles are capable of shaping an individual’s personality and outlook on life. Timothy Findley’s novel The Wars, shows that struggles lead to the character’s ultimate inner struggles, outer struggles and self-discovery. War exists in a person’s physical and psychological aspects. In The Wars, Robert Ross goes to war and fights a personal and physical battle.
Insanity, then, is inordinate or irregular, or impaired action of the mind, of the instincts, sentiments, intellectual, or perceptive powers, depending upon and produced by an organic change in the brain.
Ross does. Her irruption makes an emotional impact on Robert, which lets him question in his mind: “why are you here?” This is one of the themes that Timothy Findley reveals in this novel: private vs. public. Another example is: Robert’s willingness of joining the army is generated by his sister’s death, and he wants to run away from guilt. However, he does not save his sister’s life because he is masturbating in his bedroom. The deed itself is a private action, and this private action pushes him to go into the
Individuals often yield to conformity when they are forced to discard their individual freedom in order to benefit the larger group. Despite the fact that it is important to obey the authority, obeying the authority can sometimes be hazardous especially when morals and autonomous thought are suppressed to an extent that the other person is harmed. Obedience usually involves doing what a rule or a person tells you to but negative consequences can result from displaying obedience to authority for example; the people who obeyed the orders of Adolph Hitler ended up killing innocent people during the Holocaust. In the same way, Stanley Milgram noted in his article ‘Perils of Obedience’ of how individuals obeyed authority and neglected their conscience reflecting how this can be destructive in experiences of real life. On the contrary, Diana Baumrind pointed out in her article ‘Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience’ that the experiments were not valid hence useless.
Having been a first-hand observer of Robert for a long time I’ve seen other desirable virtues begin to emerge in him. He’s become quite entrepreneurial, and as a close friend of his I’ve been drawn into many of his wild schemes as an unwilling ally.