Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflections about plato's republic
Plato's idea of art
Plato's view on art
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflections about plato's republic
In Plato’s Republic, we are given insight on how Plato perceives imitation on art. Plato mentions that dim eyes often see things before sharp ones. (596a) This we can interpret as a normal person being able to see things as they are rather than someone who is more knowledgeable and more analytical. To be able to see things as they are is a better approach in understanding imitation. Too much analysing can make the person overlook what is being seen; the person will end up complicating the issue.
In part 10 of his book, it enables us to see how Socrates feels about artists—specifically how their creations are stretched from the truth. Art manipulates the truth which pushes it to the area of becoming what is real. For instance, there is one
…show more content…
Along with artists, Plato aims to dispel poets as well. The only thing poets can do is imitate imitations of the truth. They corrupt everyone who reads and listens to their work being that they are twice removed from the area of becoming. If anyone were to claim or is said to know everything, they must be deceiving the people and be an imitator. One must closely examine whether to see if what they say is true or if it is not. Homer, for example, spoke ample amount about governing and war yet Socrates uncovers that he never actually governed and was never a leader for any war. If Homer had known much about these subjects as he had claimed to when he mentioned them, he much rather would have participated in them, leaving behind deeds that he could be admired for instead of just simply talking about them. Consequently, we can conclude that Homer was just a poetic imitator who actually did not know the truth or comprehend the reality but only of the …show more content…
They are limited to the ideas and phantom figures but not what really exists in the physical world. The reason being that they are only limited to the ideas and figures is due to the fact they do not possess the sufficient level of knowledge to see what is beyond the little they know. They say poets are all knowing because to make a well written piece, one must know what he is writing about. Hence, we need to decide if what they’re saying is true or if they have been deceived, making it to where they are unable to see that the poet’s work is is three times removed from the truth since they are not real. (598e) Moreover, poetry should be banished according to Socrates for the reason that no poet should be allowed to write on ideas or subjects that they do not have any experience or knowledge. Poets are able to imitate things like peace and vibrancy to display their creations charm. Although what they lack is substance. If a poem was removed of its charm then it would resemble a person who is no longer youthful.
Poets present scenes that are so far removed from the truth, turning them away from what is the most real to what is the least real. These images that they portray do not imitate the morality of the soul. The logical part of the soul is not easy to understand or imitate because it is solid and tranquil. The thing that poets do is imitating the worst parts, the tendencies that make characters lively
Each literary work portrays something different, leaving a unique impression on all who read that piece of writing. Some poems or stories make one feel happy, while others are more solemn. This has very much to do with what the author is talking about in his or her writing, leaving a bit of their heart and soul in the work. F. Scott Fitzgerald, when writing The Great Gatsby, wrote about the real world, yet he didn’t paint a rosy picture for the reader. The same can be said about T.S. Eliot, whose poem “The Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock,” presents his interpretation of hell. Both pieces of writing have many similarities, but the most similar of them all is the tone of each one.
In today’s modern view, poetry has become more than just paragraphs that rhyme at the end of each sentence. If the reader has an open mind and the ability to read in between the lines, they discover more than they have bargained for. Some poems might have stories of suffering or abuse, while others contain happy times and great joy. Regardless of what the poems contains, all poems display an expression. That very moment when the writer begins his mental journey with that pen and paper is where all feelings are let out. As poetry is continues to be written, the reader begins to see patterns within each poem. On the other hand, poems have nothing at all in common with one another. A good example of this is in two poems by a famous writer by the name of Langston Hughes. A well-known writer that still gets credit today for pomes like “ Theme for English B” and “Let American be American Again.”
Despite the beauty described in the first few stanzas of the poem, it was the feeling of doubt and pondering that approached at the end of the poem that truly was the most thought provoking. Instead of just writing of beauty, Poets must realize that they may be leading people to false ideals, and in doing so that they may actually be causing individuals to believe in something that is nothing more than a dream. This realization makes the image of the questioning poet by far the most important in the piece.
Through this sympathetic faculty, a writer is able to give flesh, authenticity and a genuine perspective to the imagined. It is only in this manner that the goal of creating living beings may be realized. Anything short of this becomes an exercise in image and in Kundera’s words, produces an immoral novel (3). The antithesis of liv... ...
There appears to be an unnatural and unfounded fascination with the alleged “works” of Socrates. Perhaps that it is simply that the absolutist ideals of philosophers such as Plato and Socrates do not appeal to the post-modern, politically correct, wishy washy, materialistic reader. It is more likely, however, that the problems posed by the philosophy itself and its surrounding circumstances outweigh the insight and philosophical ingenuity.
For some individuals, poetry is a form of freedom and expression. It is one of the many creative ways to release feelings of anger and happiness from the human mind. The intensity of every rhythm and word, and style of each poem allows readers to uncover deeper significance to the context. The rich variety achieved by mixing a combination of human imagination and reality to tell a story with deeper meaning is remarkable. This concept of combining poems and human imagination together was popularized by Edgar Allan Poe. Living an impoverished life, Poe penned stories of horror and mystery into collections of poems and short stories. He expressed his thoughts on paper with great thrill and excitement. Known for his wild imagination that included suspenseful, dark tales, he posed as a literary figure and inspired many across the world.
Despite the differences between the characters in the poems, I will also go on to say how the preoccupation with death and violence all seem to stem from the apparently unstable minds of the characters; from the instability brought on by varying emotions such as grief, jealousy, resentment, guilt and madness, and the fact that these emotions may lead to paranoia.
The essays used in this book have been chosen by Harold Bloom, being that they are still by different essayists than the last two sources mentioned and considering Bloom is not one of them, it is still not bias. This source shed some light on the context of the two poems that were analyzed, but minimal observations on the poem itself and its correlation to the themes. Given this, there was only bare to little use of this secondary source.
Books III and X contain information on art as an imitation of real things. “Imitation, we say, imitates human beings performing forced or voluntary actions, and, as a result of the action, supposing themselves to have done well or badly, and in all of this experiencing pain or enjoyment” (287). Plato also describes art as the imitation of real things as a copy of an object. A painter paints a picture of a couch. The couch in the painting looks the
...images, but with extremely unlike moods. Society often depicts many things in a different light. They may describe something as the new and adventurous thing everybody should try, but doesn’t include the effects. Often people are tricked by their means of persuasion without acknowledging the facts. The key thing these poets were trying to explain was that there is no way of knowing how something will be unless you try it. They are not saying to go out and try everything but that you can’t believe everything that people say.
...milarly, Plato says that Poetry has the same effect on us when it refers to sex and violence, arousing an array of ‘desires and feelings of pleasure and pain… it waters them when they ought to be left to whither, and makes them control us when we ought, in the interests of our own greater welfare and happiness, to control them.’ What this indicates from a rational perspective is that imitation brings undesirable emotions to our surface, allowing it to cloud our judgement, weaken our psychological stability and change our outlook on life itself. This could therefore have a drastic effect, according to Plato, on the present and future guardians who are required by the rest of us to remain emotionally stable and in full control of their own irrational desires and fears.
Restlessness is the main focus of Phillips’ article, it is the title of his article and in his opinion it is the reason why poems exist at all. “Poetry is the results of a generative restlessness of imagination… uncertainties become obsessions to be wrestled with, and with luck, the result is poetry…” (Phillips 132) Phillips, in summary of his article, claims uncertainties in life trouble our minds until the uncertainties become obsessions. We become restless in our quest to understand the uncertainties we face and by writing poems we can organize our thoughts and try to understand the things we do not. Phillips furthers his explains his claim by admitting “ I write poetry for the same reason that I read it, both as a way of being alive and as a way of trying to understand what it means—how it feels—to be alive.” (Phillips 133).
...human imagination and reality, the role of imagination in shaping that reality, and the role of the reader, as an observer as well as participant, in the understanding of poetry, of language shaping the world around him.
"The point of view which I am struggling to attack is perhaps related to the metaphysical theory of the substantial unity of the soul: for my meaning is, that the poet has, not a personality' to express, but a particular medium, which is only a medium and not a personality, in which impressions and experiences combine in peculiar and unexpected ways."
First, Plato believed that ideas are the realist things in the world. What we see in our daily life is not reality; sense perceptions are only appearances. And appearances are unreliable material copies of the immaterial pure ideas. Thus to him the world of the ideas is reasonable and fixed and holds the truth. While the world of physical appearances is variable and irrational, and it only bears reality to the extent that it succeeds in capturing the idea. To live the best life that you can and to be happy and do good, as a person you have to strive to understand and imitate the ideas as best as you can. So, with this philosophy in mind we can understand why Plato considered art as just a mindless pleasure. He viewed art as just an imitation.