Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Communism in eastern europe
The Soviet Union under Stalin
Soviet Union collapse
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Communism in eastern europe
In 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed, marking an end of the communist era in the world. The reason for the country’s corruption was mainly due to economic and moral problems. Despite the early successes the Soviet Union made, the country’s economy in the late twentieth century was stagnant, “showing no signs of catching up to the more advanced capitalist countries.”Moreover, since inhumane rule and terror are a necessity to have a successful communist state, the Soviet Union ruled with atrocity and cruelty, seen by Stalin’s brutal rule of terror and the Gulag. These problems caused many to become poor and tired of living in fear every day. Therefore, people rebelled against the government to have a change, specifically a political change to …show more content…
Firstly, general health has gotten better in Russia. “After a slight rise at the beginning of transition, infant mortality fell steadily by 40 percent from 1993 to 2006 and the decline continues." Also, "health care is receiving much larger resources. Unlike in Soviet times, all kinds of medicines and equipment are now available." Thus, as the economy is getting better, health issues in Russia have developed. The employment rate and working income have also increased as well. In 1998, 13% of the population was unemployed. However, in 2000, 13% decreased to 10%, and by 2007, it further decreased to 7%. In addition, the average living wage in 1991 was 22 dollars per month, which was very low. Then, it dramatically increased to 103 dollars per month in four years and by 2008, it reached up to 694.3 dollars per month. It is evident that in addition to health development, working conditions improved as well. With people becoming wealthier from more availability of jobs and increase of income, more students received a better education. “In the period from 1995–96 to 2002–3, the proportion of students who paid for 100 percent of their education from nongovernmental sources rose from 10.1 percent to 41.8 percent, including students in higher educational institutions for whom this number rose from 8.6 percent to 44.2 percent,” meaning more students are going to private schools. Then, with college …show more content…
Due to Russia’s severe weather, heated accommodation is necessary. Therefore, the Soviet Union, right before its corruption, provided tens of millions of warm but tiny flats. Since many people in the early 1990’s were poor, majority of Russia’s population during that time lived in these flats, about 70% of the total population. Consequently, the flats were very crowded. Moreover, the majority of these flats and houses did not have running water, and many parts of the Russian cities were slums due to the Soviet Union’s corruption. Thus, at the end era of the Soviet Union, living conditions were terrible. However, the living conditions improved as Russia’s economy grew. Many started to escape these tiny flats and find bigger homes to live. To demonstrate, between 1996 and 2003, “The proportion of the population living in 25 square metres or more per person rose from 24 per cent to 30 per cent.” Then, with worst abuses, “the proportion living in less than 9 square metres per person fell slightly, from 7 per cent to 5 per cent, and the proportion of families classed as homeless fell from 15 per cent to 11 per cent.” Therefore, the economy boom increased the size of homes in Russia. Also, household conditions improved as size of homes increased. From majority not having running water in the early 1990s, now, 24% of the homes don’t have running water and only 3% are classified as
During the 20th century, the rise of communism sparked rage in people throughout the world. More towards the end of the 1900's the fall of communism and dictatorships was just the beginning of what would eventually be a large democratic change for several countries. 1989: Democratic Revolutions at the Cold War's End, speaks about the change brought to several different countries from the 1980's-1990's and plans to show "the global transformations that marked the end of the cold war and shaped the era in which we live"(Pg V). During the cold war, communist had power and control over a large area and spread communism throughout several continents. This book specifically hits on six different studies of where communism and dictatorship affected these areas and what they did to stop it. Poland, Philippines, Chile, South Africa, Ukraine, and China throughout the end of the 20th century created revolutionary movements which brought them all one step closer to freeing themselves and creating democratic change.
the downfall of communism, as it were, took so long was the veto power of
Stalin’s hunger for power and paranoia impacted the Soviet society severely, having devastating effects on the Communist Party, leaving it weak and shattering the framework of the party, the people of Russia, by stunting the growth of technology and progress through the purges of many educated civilians, as well as affecting The Red Army, a powerful military depleted of it’s force. The impact of the purges, ‘show trials’ and the Terror on Soviet society were rigorously negative. By purging all his challengers and opponents, Stalin created a blanket of fear over the whole society, and therefore, was able to stay in power, creating an empire that he could find more dependable.
The cold war was failed by the Soviet Union for many reasons, including the sudden collapse of communism (Baylis & Smith, 2001.) This sudden collapse of communism was brought on ultimately by internal factors. The soviet unions president Gorbachev’s reforms: glasnost (openness) and perestroika (political reconstructering) ultimately caused the collapse of the Soviet Empire. Gorbachev’s basics for glasnost were the promotion of principles of freedom to criticize; the loosening of controls on media and publishing; and the freedom of worship. His essentials of perestroika were, a new legislature; creation of an executive presidency; ending of the ‘leading role’ of the communist party; allowing state enterprises to sell part of their product on the open market; lastly, allowing foreign companies to own Soviet enterprises (Baylis & Smith, 2001.) Gorbachev believed his reforms would benefit his country, but the Soviet Union was ultimately held together by the soviet tradition he was trying to change. The Soviet Union was none the less held together by “…powerful central institutions, pressure for ideological conformity, and the threat of force.
In order to conclude the extent to which the Great Terror strengthened or weakened the USSR, the question is essentially whether totalitarianism strengthened or weakened the Soviet Union? Perhaps under the circumstances of the 1930s in the approach to war a dictatorship may have benefited the country in some way through strong leadership, the unifying effect of reintroducing Russian nationalism and increased party obedience. The effects of the purges on the political structure and community of the USSR can be described (as Peter Kenez asserts) as an overall change from a party led dictatorship to the dictatorship of a single individual; Stalin. Overall power was centred on Stalin, under whom an increasingly bureaucratic hierarchy of party officials worked. During the purges Stalin's personal power can be seen to increase at the cost of the party.
When most people hear the name Joseph Stalin, they usually associate the name with a man who was part of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and was responsible for the deaths of millions of people. He was willingly to do anything to improve the power of the Soviet Union’s economy and military, even if it meant executing tens of millions of innocent people (Frankforter, A. Daniel., and W. M. Spellman 655). In chapter three of Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book, Everyday Stalinism, she argues that since citizens believed the propaganda of “a radiant future” (67), they were able to be manipulated by the Party in the transformation of the Soviet Union. This allowed the Soviet government to expand its power, which ultimately was very disastrous for the people.
During 1950-1991 The Soviet Union was considered one of the most powerful countries in the world. Known during this time for its enormous military and the overtaking and enforcing total communist ruler over all the eastern block European countries.The conquering of these countries gained the Soviet Union useful resources such as oil, food, minerals,goods,and land which during this time was very useful to the Soviet Union. Even with all of these advantages the Soviet Union had several internal problems such as severe famine , poor economy,People working in horrible conditions in factories being payed minimum wage, and depending on rival countries for food and supplies. It got worse when Gorbachev took over and made several new reforms such as glasnost and perestroika and with all of the rapid changes in the S.U ( Soviet Union) government it caused social chaos and disorder and rebellion against Gorbachev. (GQ) Though which of the factors contributed more to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Economy or politics?.(Claim) During this time period Political factors seem more responsible to the collapse of the Soviet Union, because even though the Soviet Union had several food shortages it does not compare to how the Soviet Union lost several sources of income and resources such as Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, etc.(Significance) Countries like Poland which has plenty of
Following the death of Josef Stalin in 1953, the harsh policies he implemented in not only the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, but also its many satellite nations began to break down. There was a movement to distance all of the socialist nations from Stalin?s sadistic rule. In the Peoples? Republic of Hungary, there was much disillusionment with this Stalinist absolutism (Felkay 50). This disillusionment with the Soviet ideal of socialism lead the people of the fledgeling socialist state of Hungary to rise up in revolt, but ill-preparedness and the strength of the Soviet Red Army put down the insurrection within several days.
Russia, a vast country with a wealth of natural resources, a well, educated population, and diverse industrial base, continues to experience, formidable difficulties in moving from its old centrally planned economy to a modern market economy. President Yeltsin's government has made substantial strides in converting to a market economy since launching its economic reform program in January 1992 by freeing nearly all prices, slashing defense spending, eliminating the old centralized distribution system, completing an ambitious voucher privatization program, establishing private financial institutions, and decentralizing trade. Russia, however, has made little progress in a number of key areas that are needed to provide a solid foundation for the transition to a market economy.
to assume the role of dictator. This was a phenomenon which was to become a
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union a great deal of debate has ensued as to what caused the Soviet empire's demise both within the former Soviet Union and amongst scholars worldwide. Various theories have been published amongst scholars attempting to explain and pinpoint the flaws in the Soviet system and the forces that drove the Soviet Union to a brisk and catastrophic collapse. Economic weakness is commonly argued to be the cause of the collapse but others argue that political decisions made by Gorbachev and his supporters should bear most of the blame for the collapse. Another subset of scholars argue that the diverse ethnic composition of the Soviet empire lead to divided loyalties amongst the Soviet satellite states and created fatal fault lines within the empire that Soviet leaders simply underestimated. Others have put forth the theory that the moral consensus amongst the elite class favouring the communist system broke down and lead to a complete Soviet Collapse. The collapse of the Soviet empire is one the most dramatic and consequential historical events to transpire in the last 30 years. Understanding the collapse of the Soviet Union can contribute to our understanding of how the complex interplay between empire, economics, politics, ethnicity, morality can shape and drive historical events.
The Soviet Union, which was once a world superpower in the 19th century saw itself in chaos going into the 20th century. These chaoses were marked by the new ideas brought in by the new leaders who had emerged eventually into power. Almost every aspect of the Soviet Union was crumbling at this period both politically and socially, as well as the economy. There were underlying reasons for the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union and eventually Eastern Europe. The economy is the most significant aspect of every government. The soviet economy was highly centralized with a “command economy” (p.1. fsmitha.com), which had been broken down due to its complexity and centrally controlled with corruption involved in it. A strong government needs a strong economy to maintain its power and influence, but in this case the economic planning of the Soviet Union was just not working, which had an influence in other communist nations in Eastern Europe as they declined to collapse.
The Soviet Union was a communist state before it fell apart in the early 1990’s. Communist political economy shaped the direction of the nation’s industrial development. Industrialization contributed to increases in Soviet wealth, but only for those favored by the communist regime. Working Soviets were left poor. This form of communism came to be because of the Russian Revolution and was based on the idea that all people are equal. While being a great idea in theory, it did not work out in the real world. Soviet-style industrialization was about earning money quickly and in an efficient manner, the officials implemented the idea that “everyone should be the master in his own house”, and they achieved great power and money.
The legacy of Josef Stalin is horrendous. “BY his word he could kill them, have them tortured, have them rescued again, have them rewarded. Life and death depended on his whim,” recalls German psychoanalyst Erich Fromm of Stalin’s thirty year reign (Goode, “The World; Stalin to Saddam”). Stalinist terror came to an end, however, once Mikhail S. Gorbachev took office. Forming alliances with Western countries while abolishing several oppressive policies, Gorbachev attempted to reintroduce the once inimical, Communist Russia into the global community as a newly reformed ally. He dubbed Stalin’s actions as “enormous and unforgivable,” and the outlook for world peace in the latter half of the twentieth century seemed
During the 1970’s and the 1980’s the Soviet Union was recognized worldwide as being a strong political power, although the Soviet Union was not as it appeared to be. When Mikhail Gorbachev (see Figure 1) was elected General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union on 11 March 1985, not one soul could have predicted that in 6 years the Soviet Union would collapse into fifteen separate states. He attempted to make the Soviet system into a democracy, which backfired quickly (Grachev, 1995). The main reasons for the fall of the USSR are economic issues, political issues, psychological factors, and the competition with the West, the leading issue being economic factors. The USSR’s economy eventually turned into a standstill, with no improvement what so ever, and the nation became desperate. The economic factors are linked with the political factors. Such things as dishonesty, propaganda, and secrecy also played a large role in the USSR’s collapse.