Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship between employment and employee
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relationship between employment and employee
Employment relationship has a substantial effect on the employees work performance and the overall organisations success (Randmann, 2013). However, individuals attitudes and behaviours in the organisation do not fully correspond to the formal written employer contract, but it’s to a large extend influence by the individuals perception of one’s obligation, promises made by the employer and how well the employer has fulfilled ones obligations (Shore,2006). A fulfilled obligation in an employment relationship results in more desirable benefits for organisations. Throughout the employment relationship employees and employers will try to make sense of the social context in which they work, and this sense-making affects their perceptions attitudes and subsequent actions. Therefore, the psychological contract deals with the pattern of unwritten beliefs held by the employee and organisation about the exchange relationship that operates between them (Rousseau, 1995).
As a consequence, a psychological contract is essential to the employee relationship and is a useful concept for understanding the challenges associated with managing employment relationship (Guest, 2004). It is an effective way to understand what an employee is ready to contribute and what he or she expects to receive in return from the employer. It provides a framework for studying how employees and employers have different perceptions of neutral obligations and how these obligations have been fulfilled.
Due to globalisation, economic instability and labour market trends, organisations such as Toyota would have to adapt to the changing external environment by changing its organisational strategy, structure, process and people. This essay outlines that strategic change ...
... middle of paper ...
...eral ways. Such as using employee attitude surveys, which states the attitude and perceptions of employees regarding the change.
Supervisors play a key role in corporate change plans , they are the ones the key leaders to communicate the need and nature for the change, Supervisors at Toyota should be providing briefing sessions prior to the major change , that would include layoffs they would also ask about the concerns regarding the change. These are then articulated to the management for them to work out as many recommendations as they possibly could to reduce the negative outcomes of the psychological contracts. The final plan of supervisors should articulate and explain why the change is needed. Management should also develop change booklets to guide face to face discussions between the employee and the employer and between the supervisors and the employees.
Change affects more than just a program or a process within an organization, change affects employees, collecting data on employee’s readiness and willingness to accept a change will help leaders know if the organization is socially ready for change (Cole, Harris, and Bernerth, 2006). A change might be positive for an organization but if the employees who will be affect by the change are lost in the process then it could create a greater issue than not making the change. Leadership needs to communicate and inspire the employees to be positive toward the change, seeking to enhance their job satisfaction not make changes that will increase their desire to leave. This data is best collected early in the change initiative allowing leadership to properly cast the vision while addressing concerns. This requires leadership to create platforms for employees to engage in the change initiative freely (Ford, 2006). Employee attitudes can be measured through these dialogues providing leadership with necessary measureable data (Hughes, 2007).
Purpose & Other: : I give the purpose and other a 10 out of 10 because the goal of the article was to inform organizations, employers, presidents and/or employees about the importance of strengthening relationships between an employer, an employee, and the company in its entirety.
Along with the rapid development of economy and society, the companies have to own skills to adapt, cater, and transfer new knowledge, and try to modify their activities to reflect insights. Strategic management evolves
The short-story “Barn Burning” is written by William Faulkner. William Faulkner’s short story begins with Mr. Snopes being accused for “burning a barn,” or so they say. The author creates a very tense situation between Mr. Snopes and his son, which comes to play during the rest of the story. Having said that everything is thought of wrong or right which will eventually lead to the dispersion of the family. Having the upper hand on choosing whether something is right or wrong is up to you to believe and no one else to choose.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Strategic management Toyota case study. 2013. Strategic management Toyota case study. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/ArioArdianto/strategic-management-toyota-case-study-27410014. [Accessed 15 December 2013].
The transformation of a company requires hundreds, sometimes thousands of employees to adopt a new view of its future, a future they must regard as essential. Change management involves managing the process of achieving this future state. Change can be viewed from two vantage points, that of the people making the changes and that of the people experiencing the changes. In the top-down, or strategic viewpoint associated with management, the focus is on technical issues such as the investment required, the processes for implementing the change, how soon the change can be realized, and the outcome. In the bottom-up viewpoint of the employee, the focus is on what the change means to the ...
Psychological contract is the unwritten contract that illustrates a set of expectations exists between the individual and the organisation (Sonnenberg et al, 2011). Svensson & Wolven (2010) point out that it can be a relationship between the members of a group, the people who work in the same company, department or organisation, several groups or parties in an organization, etc. It includes the work performance requirement, job security, training, potential development, compensation and subside. Psychological contracts are the mental representation based on belief or perception, so it may help the employees and employers get rid of a complicated employment relationship. For instance, the employees and employers may understand very clearly about the terms and conditions and what they have been agreed upon. The perception of each individual is very important and essential (Ekelund et al, 2010, 1438). Thus, when they work in a high competitive group, it could motivate them to implement their work consciously. Combined with a few exceptions, some researches cite that psychological contract is only regarding to the employee–manager relation and the term that mostly...
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.
Why do organizations change? With time goes by, rapid development of science and technology had led us to a world full of competitions. Change and stay alert to keep up with the current trend is essential asset to survive in this aggressive global economy. As the framework indicated by Pettigrew, there are two key context factors makes a great deal of effects on the reason for companies to change. Those are outer context and Inner context. Outer context could refer to the surrounding environment around the firm and the global economics status, etc. Inner context could be downsizing, restructuring the Gestalt, or the problem with coherent design archetype. Under the stress of the outer and inner context, forces or triggers will bring out the revolution. Change can be seen in a short term way and also in a long term way. Short term change could be a sudden, discontinuous and frame-breaking rupture which has an impact on the whole organisation, or new forms of management ad structure of the firm itself, or the breakthrough created by the major innovations or even can refers to the impact of new product and new market opportunities. Normally, financial crisis will be an initiative as a trigger to revolution. At first of the revolution, there would probably already has small changes in normal management and structure. As a long term way to apply the change, change agents are needed to do an ongoing, continuous and gradual progression or give some simpler initiatives such as improvements to existing products and product range.
From this definition, the researcher is able to determine that Heery & Noon are stating that, employee relations involves the bulk of work that is focuses with maintaining employer and employee relationships within the organisation and contributes to upholding satisfactory productivity, employee motivation and work morale. Nevertheless, Heery & Noon’s employee relations definition is understood by the researcher that, it focuses on preventing and resolving problems which may arise within the workplace regarding employees and also gives individuals at work some involvement in the organisation rather than it being more based around industrial relations. Trade unions also embrace employee management patterns but also have restrictions in interacting with employees. Heery & Noon mention that employee relations is a common title for the industrial relation functions, but in some case, employee relations has different perspective and approaches than industrial relations and can also be used...
The relationship between employer and employees plays a pivotal role in the performance of the organization. Employers and employees have certain responsibilities towards each other which facilitate a fair and productive workplace. Positive work relationships create a cooperative climate with effort towards the same goals. Conflict, on the other hand, is likely to divert attention away from organizational performance.
How difficult (or easy) is it for an employer to prevent an employee working for others (or themselves), both during the employment and after it has ended? Refer to relevant cases and legislation.
Employee relation is a philosophy to manage employees in organization. Effective employee relation is based on attitudes and skills of management rather than prescribed management function (CIPD, 2016). Employee relation is latest term that prevailing in today’s environment instead of industrial relation. Due to the increase of white color job in service sector and increasing importance of individual security and reward, is the reason to introduce employee relation term (Daniels, 2006). Different researchers or authors use different terms for employee relation such as “employment relation” was used by Rose, 2008, employment relationship is used by Lewis et al, 2003, whereas Daniels,2006, Blyton and Turnbull, 2004, Hollinshead et al.,2003 were agreed on term “employee relation”. Employee relation is the combination of social, legal, economic, political and psychological relationship between employee and employer in which an employee is agree to provide his or her mental or physical efforts in return of agreed financial or non financial rewards (Lewis et al, 2003). Organizational success is depends on many factors and employee relation is one of the most important factor that enable organization to achieve their goals efficiently.
Managers must first evaluate their personal reactions to the organisational change and how they can best accept this change. They must then ascertain the knowledge or training they may need to lead this change in the most successful manner.