Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of biology to society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of biology to society
Human Biology can be defined as “the branch of science concerned with the development and functioning of the human organism and aspects of the life of human populations such as their ecology, genetics and epidemiology” (Oxford Dictionary). Human health can be defined as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” (World Health Organisation 1948), and this is where the idea of a “good doctor” comes into play – a good doctor is one that doesn’t simply look at the human biology of a person, but looks at their overall health in the diagnostic process. Knowledge of human biology and the advancements in recent years is undeniably important, for example the increase in stem cell knowledge In the sub-article “ABC of being a Good Doctor” (Malvinder S Parmar, 2002), we are given a wide range of adjectives that a “good doctor” should be, and while words such as “knowledgeable”, “intellectual” and “qualified” are included, the majority of the adjectives describe the personal or humane characteristics of a person. In some cases these traits cannot be taught or learned, but are either part of a person or not, for example “caring”, “compassionate”, “empathy”, “nurturing” and “sensitive”. These attributes are vital to be a “good doctor”, and should be considered by all to ensure that patients get the care and respect from their doctor that they This coincides with my opinion that while knowledge of human biology is very important to be a good doctor, it is nearly assumed by both the general public and other professionals in the field that a doctor has this, and that it is other characteristics and skills that differentiates a doctor from a good
The biological approach can be applied in a health setting through hospitals and schools. Due to the biological approach being centralised around genes, doctors can use this approach to help them detect illnesses that may have been inherited from family members. It is best for GP’s to gain this information from parents in the early stages of a child’s life so that they know in advance whether or not the child is prone to gain any life changing illnesses, if this happens the doctor may be able to give the child treatment for these type of illnesses from an early age.
As physicians, we are foundations for our patients. We become sources of strength and emotional security for them, in trying times. We do more than fix others back to health (spotting signs of illness, giving diagnoses, drugs or treatment). We must understand the concerns of those we help and be there for our patients—through pain and sorrow. ================
However, these meanings, of what it once meant to be a physician as was established by the white coat, are currently being eroded by the recent changes in the way scientific medicine is now being seen. This may be as a result of the emergence of a capitalistic or rather profit driven medical system, or due to a number of many other factors. Whatever the case, one thing remains for sure, the subsequent tension between the profession and the society is affecting the interaction between the individual patients –and the physicians, gradually creating irreparable rift of distrust, and rendering null and void what the ‘white coats’ were created to stand for.
In the medical field, there are many ethical dilemmas that a person could face. One of the major dilemmas in the medical field comes from being a doctor. While attending to a patient/ client the doctor may not know the best treatment or course of action to take because of the many options there could be. The values and beliefs of a doctor can’t interfere with the treatment of a patient/client. Their job is to be honest, benevolent, respectful, and to maintain confidentiality of the patient/client.
In the medical community there appears to be a divide between disease-centered care and patient-centered care. Both Charon and Garden, readily acknowledge this. Charon explains how although doctors can boast in their “impressive technical progress,” and “their ability to eradicate once fatal infections,” doctors often lack the abilities to recognize the pain of their patients and to extend empathy (3). Charon further adds that “medicine practiced without a genuine and obligating awareness of what patients go through [empathy] may fulfill its technical goals, but it is an empty medicine, or, at best, half a medicine” (5). Often, doctors fail to remember that their patients are more than just a person with cancer or a congenital heart defect — they are human, a whole person with dreams, aspirations, and fears. According to Charon, “scientifically competent medicine alone cannot help a patient grapple w...
Albert Jonsen, the author of “A Short History of Medical Ethics”, covers more than two thousand years of renowned medical history in a mere hundred and twenty pages. He covers many cultural customs and backgrounds involving medical discourse, beliefs, and discoveries which have led to the very formation of the distinguished society we live in today. However, throughout this brief tour, Jonsen exploits the fact that even though there have been many cultural differences, there are a few common themes which have assimilated over the years and formed the ethics of medicine. The most prevalent themes of ethics presented in Jonsens text, are decorum, deontology and politic ethics. Decorum is referred to as both the professional etiquette and personal virtues of medicine. Deontology refers to rules and principles, and politic ethics expresses the duties physicians have to the community.
Does your head hurt, does your body ache, and how are your bowl movements? After a head to toe assessments, touching and prodding, the physician writes up a prescription and explains in a medical jargon the treatment plan. As the short consultation comes to a close, it’s wrapped up with the routine “Please schedule an appointment if there are no signs of improvement”. This specific experience often leaves the patient feeling the “medical gaze” of the physicians. Defined by good and good, the medical gaze is the physicians mentality of objectifying their patient to nothing more than a biological entity. Therefore it is believed that the medical gaze moves away from compassionate and empathetic care, thus leaving patients feeling disconnected from their physicians. In order to understand how the medical gaze has stemmed into patient care, I begin with observations of a Grand Round, lectures for the progress of continuing medical education of physicians. There are expectations of physicians to be informed of cutting edge medical procedures and biotechnology since it can result in a less aggressive and more efficient treatment plan of patients. As I witness the resident physician’s maturation of medical competence in during a Surgical Grand Round at UC Irvine Medical Center, it has shifted the paradigm of the medical gaze and explains how competence is a form of compassion and empathy in patient care.
The different models to health all use different principles. The biomedical model concentrates on the physical and biological aspect of a disease. Doctors and health professionals practice this model. This model is associated with the diagnosis, treatment and cure of the disease. This model evolves as times goes
Non-verbal cues weigh heavily regarding patients’ ability trust doctors; they need to believe the doctor exhibits empathy for their situation. For instance, failure to initiate eye contact suggest coldness and a lack of interest. (Gartland, p. 23) Furthermore, many patients believe doctors are arrogant. (Gartland, p.23) A despondent child in Duke’s Pediatric Emergency Department belted at a resident, “You think you know everything!” Patient mistrust intensifies as a result of the doctors’ pretentious tone. Again, despite the personal nature of their profession, doctors frequently pontificate. (Gartland, p. 25) Physicians’ boastful tone suggest that the patient’s opinion is no longer important. Consequently, patients lose aith in the doctors’ ability to cater to their specific
Professionalism is an adherence to a set of values comprising both a formally agreed-upon code of conduct and the informal expectations of colleagues, clients and society. The key values include acting in a patient's interest, responsiveness to the health needs of society, maintaining the highest standards of excellence in the practice of medicine and in the generation and dissemination of knowledge. In addition to medical knowledge and skills, medical professionals should present psychosocial and humanistic qualities such as caring, empathy, humility and compassion, as well as social responsibility and sensitivity to people's culture and beliefs. All these qualities are expected of members of highly trained professions.
This assignment aims to define and discuss how communication and teamwork influences the quality health care given to patients by health care practitioners. The essay will look at each of these factors separately but also discusses how they influence each other and the positive and negative impact they have on the patients’ quality of care.
To further introduce Medical Anthropology, I will reiterate highlights of my previous presentations. Early on in Turkey, I asked each person in our program the following question: "I would like you to tell me about health and what it means to you?" The answers to this question varied widely, making it difficult to define a global conception of health. In analyzing the answers, I established the following five components of health:
Consequently, it can be assumed that doctors might tend to avoid such a confession in order to maintain their image of being a “good doctor” (J.Shahidi). Not being a good doctor may eventually lead to doctor’s loss of business and as a result physicians may tend to hide the truth even if it opposes patient autonomy
According to Foucault and Illich (in Van Krieken et al. 2006: 351-352), doctors and the medical profession have traditionally been empowered by their knowledge as the authority that society defers to with regards to the definition of disease and health. With improvements in medical technology as well as the advent of the hospital, an evolution...
Doctors can only do so much; in order to be healthy one has to work along with their doctor by keeping up with preventative methods to help one’s health opposed to taking several pills per day for heart disease while continuously eating poorly. However, this partnership between patient and doctor must be met with tedious planning taking the patient’s whole lifestyle into prospective, from their religious to personal beliefs. Pride must be set aside by both partners, as they make negotiable compromises before consigning on this health plan. Doctor Danielle Ofri; writes in her article ‘Doctor Priorities vs. Patient Priorities’ that doctors view a patient’s medical condition ...