Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Trouble at the zoo management project
Controversy of zoos
Controversy of zoos
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Trouble at the zoo management project
This essay is conducted to analysis the impact of customers on Zoos Victoria success.
10.7% of market share in the Gardens category in Australia owned by Zoo Victoria (IBIS-World 2016). Zoo Victoria has three branches or zoos;
1. Melbourne Zoo.
2. Healesville Sanctuary.
3. Werribee Open Range Zoo.
However, there is a significant change occurred in one of the main external environmental factor (Political factor). Lately, the estimated limited finding from Australian’s government forced Zoos Victoria to search for more financial support from other sources like calibrates, private sponsors or increase the membership with more marketing efforts (Zoos Victoria 2012-13).
Therefore, Zoos Victoria focuses to gain 65% increase in membership by the
…show more content…
Awareness.
2. Purchase.
3. retention.
• Focus on a specific target segment to find what the causes of less interest in membership program.
• Suggest some solutions that might increase the memberships and revenue especially after the current limited government funding.
• Show some factors that might motivate visitors.
A visit to the Zoos Victoria locations, Zoos website and social media accounts showed that there is a lack of awareness of the membership programs in Zoos Victoria, not-for-profit community and conservation efforts.
Therefore, this essay will briefly analysis the impact of customers on Zoos Victoria success with support of reliable sources.
There are three main frameworks will be used in this essay:
• Managerial functions.
• Mintzberg's Managerial Roles.
• importance of managerial roles in small and large businesses.
It will show how Zoos Victoria faced this changes and how it can positively deal with it. Especially, to increase the number of membership. Also, what options that Zoos Victoria uses to increase revenue and suggestions to reduces the lack of awareness
…show more content…
Zoos Victoria is highly influenced by Australian government support but in the last few years, there is a significant decrease in government funding. This financial issue showed their weakness of using technological elements that leads to lack of awareness (Which might consider as a reason of low membership) (Zoos Victoria report 2014/15).
Therefore, Zoos Victoria facing a problem of low membership in the last few years and it aims to increase the membership as in a short time. In addition to the current limited government funding, this shrinking of membership number is due to the lack of awareness about membership programs, not-for-profit community and conservation efforts amongst Australian society. Misusing the technological environmental factor are impacting the Zoos Victoria annual membership average (Zoos Victoria report 2014/15).
The current huge improvements in technology spread the content of advertising quickly and make it easy to access. Around 70% Australians access their social media accounts by using their cell phones (Sensis 2015). However, many visitors in Zoos Victoria are unaware about the Zoos Victoria conservation efforts and it is a not-for-profit zoo. (This is some results from the Visitors’
Have you ever seen an animal sitting in a cage all alone with nothing to do. Well, zoos are trying to change that fact. They will allow the animals to live in an environment that is like their home. Many people don't realize this, but zoo are keeping and breeding these animals because they would not survive in the wild alone. In the three passages, ¨The Stripes Will Survive,¨ ¨The Zood Go Wild from No More Dodos,¨ ¨Our Beautiful Macaws and Why They Need Enrichment.¨ All of these articles present one claim, that is that the role of zoos is no longer to keep animal, but to protect them.
Importance of Zoos: Rhetorical Analysis of "Let 's Keep Zoos: Learning stewardship is a good thing."
Peoples Trust article “Zoos & Conservation” touched surface solely on zoos located in Britain. What about the rest of the world? Luckily there is a group called the World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA) that inspects zoos and aquariums making sure that they are fit for conservation. For instance, the Giza Zoo In Cairo was shut down for killing two gorillas that may have been infected with disease and for extra pay putting visitors in danger so they could pet any animal they requested. Now if one of these animals were to attack a visitor then they would put down the animal in which is just doing what its instincts tell them.
Considering the many challenges animals face in the wild, it is understandable that people may be eager to support zoos and may feel that they are protective facilities necessary for animal life. In the article “ Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals”, Author Robin Ganzert argues that Zoos are ethical institutions that enrich the lives of animals and ultimately protect them. Statistics have shown that animals held in captivity have limited utilitarian function resulting in cramped quarters, poor diets, depression, and early death for the animals thus, proving that Zoos are not ethical institutions that support and better the lives of animals as author Robin Ganzert stated (Cokal 491). Ganzert exposes the false premise in stating
Stotts uses scholarly articles, newspaper articles and historical monographs to show the changing ideologies and perception of zoological parks in America. He addresses the reasons adults and children alike were attracted to these parks. Stotts addresses the appeal of the zoo to American families, which extends upon the social history of the United States. Furthermore he addresses how zoos came to become sanctuaries, preservers and protectors of America’s wildlife for future generations.
As a conclusion, the offer of ‘Adopt an Animal’ helps Australia Zoo satisfy target audience’s needs and maximum their profit. Customers not only can make a difference for the animals but also get what they want.
Zoo’s still remain as important part of any community and to the hearts of young children every year. It is estimated that more people annually visit zoos than enter all U.S. national Parks and that approximately and that 35% of people who attend zoos are adults.
Zoos have been with us throughout our history, and can provide a good barometer of public beliefs and values at any given time. Therefore it seems necessary to explore whether in today’s society contemporary zoos are a means of educating and conserving or still seek to control and exhibit animal others for human benefit. In order to make this assessment there are a number of contributing factors. Firstly it is important to establish context by considering the history of zoos and looking at the changes from the early menageries to contemporary zoos who strive to be institutions of refuge for animals facing twenty-first century global challenges. This links into how the physical space of zoos has changed over time and whether these advancements have made any crucial difference to the welfare of animals. Following this conservation, education and scientific research will be explored in detail in order to assess whether they provide good enough motives for keeping animals in captivity. I will seek to argue that although attempts have been made to point zoos in the direction of conservation and education, in my opinion the concepts of dominance and human superiority are still at the core of modern zoos.
...provide a habitat for animals that had there’s destroyed. Furthermore they need to improve their captive breeding programs and abandon the failed programs. Zoos need to address the concern that animals are not living up to there actual life span and either release them into there natural habitat or find an alternative. Animal stress is also of big concern because it is causing physiological harm.
"How Zoos Are Saving Our Animals." – Features – ABC Environment (Australian Broadcasting Corporation). N.p., n.d. Web. 03 May 2015.
What about zoos in other regions of the world? This question is a good one; as it applies to regional views. Zoos all over the world have different rules; for visitors and their animals, depending on who and where they are located. China has a main focus on saving their giant pandas from extinction; note they are vulnerable, but can end up endangered once more. Some zoos run on donations; Cheyenne Mountain zoo and Dartmoor zoo, while others are federally paid; Denver zoo. Each zoo has a mascot to be the main view; Cheyenne mountain has a giraffe, Denver has a lion, Australia zoo has a crocodile, but under that mascot are other animals branched out. This means that no zoo is a like; they may have the same animals, but their rules and lifestyle are entirely different.
Zoos today say that one of their main goals is to conserve endangered species and eventually reintroduce them back into the wild. However, Benjamin Beck, former associate director of biological programs at the National Zoo in Washington, found that over the past century only 16 of 145 reintroduction programs worldwide ever actually restored any of the animals back to the wild (qtd. in Fravel). He also found that a majority was carried out by the government and not the actual programs themselves. Beck noted that the billions of dollars the zoos were receiving were going towards hi-tech exhibits and marketing strategies to get people to go to the zoos. So which zoos are actually attempting to save the lives they claim to be? According to David Hancocks, a former zoo director with 30 years’ experience, many zoos that are not affiliated with the AZA do not spend hardly any of their fu...
Since approximately 1250 B.C., ancient Egyptians had created and practiced the capture and display of animals in what are now known as zoos (Fravel). Records describe such exotic animals as birds, lions, giraffes, and tigers in captivity (Fravel). Since then, zoos have continued to entertain millions with the exciting chance to view exotic animals up close and personal. Even in ancient Greece, exotic animals were on display in fighting arenas, and in enclosed viewing areas. Originally in America, zoos were just created so that royalty and the wealthy could flaunt their exotic animals to the public (Leolupus). Today, with species threatened and habitats disappearing worldwide, zoos are serving a new purpose other than the mere exhibition of animals – conservation. (Fravel). When you think of a zoo, you either think of a fun, entertaining place that provides close-up and exciting exhibits of wild animals that you would otherwise never get the chance to see, or a place where people keep suffering, unhappy animals captive just for entertainment and display. However, despite whichever view you hold, and despite the stereotypes, some zoos have evolved to serve alternative and helpful purposes. Although some zoos face controversy due to allegations such as lack of space and quality care, neglect, and cruelty, some zoos have programs specifically designed to help and protect animal species. For example, these zoos have programs that help such conservation efforts as breeding.
Some people may argue that zoos protect animals and species under this polluted world, however, do animals in zoos really need our “help”? Yes, but surely not that many. According to Captive Animals Protection Society (CAPS), 79% of animals in United Kingdom zoos and over 70% of elephants in European zoos are wild-caught. It seems that zoos need them rather than they need zoos.
Supporters of zoos argue that they help to conserve endangered species, but in fact they are not very good at this. Even the world famous panda-breeding programme has been very costly and unsuccessful. Also, zoo life does not prepare animals for the challenges of life in the wild. For example, two rare lynxes released into the wild in Colorado died from starvation even though the area was full of hares, which are a lynx’s natural prey.