Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An Analysis of Types of Love in The Hunchback of Notre-Dame
Themes of the hunchback Notre Dame
An Analysis of Types of Love in The Hunchback of Notre-Dame
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Victor Hugo novel The Hunchback of Notre-Dame written in 1831 can be classified as either as a romantic love story or a beautiful tragedy. The novel is set in and around Paris France in the late fifteenth century, with it’s main attraction being the Cathedral of Notre-Dame. Hugo’s characters show great love and loyalty to each other but then at the same time, they judge each other and use each other for personal benefits.
Novel:
Characters
Quasimodo- He gives the title of this novel it meaning. He was born a disfigured hunchback, with one useful eye and the other covered by a wart. His mother abandoned him as a baby, then adopted by Claude Frollo. He grew up in Notre-Dame and at fourteen; he received the title of bell ringer. He considers this a high honor and he took his position very seriously. Unfortunately, the bells are what have taken his hearing from him. He very rarely ventures out of the cathedral because the people are cruel and despise him. The rare occasion that his does live the cathedral; he is elected as the Pope of Fools. His undying loyalty to Frollo gets him into trouble with the law and this starts a series of events that lead to love and death.
Esmeralda- A young gypsy street dancer who is a caring, passionate person, is the center of the drama that is displayed throughout the novel. Her kindness towards Quasimodo in his time of need shows the reader how good of a person she can be. Quasimodo and Frollo share a love for her that she does not return. She is in love with another man that does not love her. Charged with a murder and then sentenced to death by hanging, she is rescue thanks to her admirer Quasimodo. In the end, her hate for Claude Frollo seals her fate and she dies on the gallows.
Claude Fro...
... middle of paper ...
... novel. Even though the series of events differ from the novel, the film really bring to life the atmosphere of the festival and how Esmeralda is introduced to the viewer. Hugo goes into great detail about the bells in Notre Dame and I believe that Disney did not address the bells as much in the movie. It seems as if they focused more on the characters and their story and less on the architect of Norte Dame. Both the novel and the movie are both well executed in their own aspects and are both enjoyable.
Works Cited
Hugo, Victor. The Hunchback of Notre Dame. Golgotha Press, 2010. Apple iBooks.
Kirk Wise, Gary Trousdale. Dir. Buena Vista Pictures. Perf. Tom Hulce, Demi Moore, Jason Alexander, Tony Jay. Walt Disney Pictures. 1996. Netflix.
Olin H. Moore. How Victor Hugo Created the Characters of Notre-Dame de Paris.
PMLA , Vol. 57, No. 1 (Mar., 1942), pp. 255-274
Both book and movie capture good moments and ideas of Esquivel. I would say the book was more entertaining and memorable for me. The novel never rests or drags on, and although it evolves around many tragedies a dying love and lovers, in the end you truly feel happy for the way things turn to be. So does the movie, the end of it is very powerful, I might have not got attached to its characters but I fell in love with the magical fairy tale and romance of Like Water For Chocolate.
Esperanza is the heart and soul of this story. She changes and develops new habits over the course of the book. Because of how the book is written, she’s also the main character who gives the story it’s unity. Everything in the story is told in her perspective anyway so she could be the narrator and the protagonist. Even the stories about other characters have some sort of connection with Esperanza. She is The House On Mango Street, she is Esperanza.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Esperanza tries to be a good friend to Sally, but ends up appearing immature and silly. Esperanza feels shame, as she “wanted to be dead”, to “turn into the rain”, and have “my eyes melt into the ground like black snails” (Cisneros 97). With sensory-rich imagery, the author uses similes and metaphors to describe Esperanza’s feelings of utter mortification as she embarrasses herself in front of Sally. Esperanza becomes confused about her newfound sexuality and her loss of innocence when she begins acting strangely, yet awkwardly around boys. She doesn’t know whether to act like a child or an adult because although she wants to be mature and glamorous like Sally, and she gets exposed to the harsh nature of society. The disillusioned view of becoming mature and having boys notice her is especially realized by Esperanza when she gets raped at a carnival. Through detailed imagery, Cisneros describes the dirtiness of the boy, elaborating on “his dirty fingernails against my skin” and “his sour smell again” (Cisneros 100) and the confusion and anger from Esperanza. After this experience, Esperanza blames Sally instead for covering up the truth about boys and is heartbroken about the real truth of sexuality and men. It is clear that Esperanza vividly remembers this awful experience, and just reflecting on this experience causes her thoughts to
Esperanza is a determined character by working hard and dreaming a lot to make it a better situation. (When Esperanza points out that she needs money
Esperanza, the most liberated of the sisters, devoted her life to make other people’s lives better. She became a reporter and later on died while covering the Gulf Crisis. She returned home, to her family as a spirit. At first, she spoke through La Llorona, a messenger who informed La Loca that her sister has died. All her family members saw her. She appeared to her mother as a little girl who had a nightmare and went near to her mother for comfort. Caridad had conversations with her about politics and La Loca talked to her by the river behind their home.
... first identifies her difficulty with her society, and then accepts and at the same time defies it. In “Boys and Girls” the reader sees a young girl that is investigating her possibilities in life. In “Beautiful and Cruel” the reader sees a woman who has become independent from the boundaries of her society. Esperanza is tied down by the “anchor,” and then casts it off with her refusal to wait for the “ball and chain.” Esperanza changes from a little girl who makes wishes about her future, to a woman who takes her future in her hands as she begins a “war” on the limitations that she face in her Latino society.
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
Women all around Esperanza, such as Minerva and Sally, are held hostage, within their own acceptance of an unjust cultural fate. For example, Minerva is a young girl who constantly prays for better luck, and a happier life, but enables her husband to take advantage of her, and therefore sets the path for her unsatisfactory life. “ One day she is through and lets him know enough is enough. Out the door he goes. Clothes, records, shoes. Out the window and the door locked. However, that night he comes back and sends a big rock through the window. Then he is sorry and she opens the door again. Minerva finds herself forgiving without truly seeing that her husband is sorry. She used marriage as a way out from her undesirable life, yet her married life still carries the same characteristics. And so, without fighting for a satisfactory life she settles with the hand she is dealt.
Mersault, the narrator and protagonist, is The Stranger. He has cut himself off from the world. As he narrates the novel is divided into two parts. In part 1 he deals with everyday affairs except for two important events. At the beginning of the novel his mother has died. He is struggling to make ends meet, therefore he sent his mother to a nursing home in Marengo. This has brought criticism from the community. At the funeral he does not feel the grief as is expected nor is he concerned with the formalities of mourning. The next day Mersault starts an affair with Marie, who at one time been a typist in his office. They have a wonderful time eating, swimming, watching movies and making love. People, i.e. society is aghast that he has not observed what is considered a proper mourning period for his mother.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
As the era of literature slowly declines, the expert critiques and praise for literature are lost. Previously, novels were bursting at the seams with metaphors, symbolism, and themes. In current times, “novels” are simply short stories that have been elaborated on with basic plot elements that attempt to make the story more interesting. Instead of having expert critical analysis written about them, they will, most likely, never see that, as recent novels have nothing to analyze. Even books are beginning to collect dust, hidden away and forgotten, attributing to the rise of companies such as Spark Notes. An author deserves to have his work praised, no matter how meager and the masses should have the right to embrace it or to reject it. As much of this has already been considered, concerning Les Misérables, the purpose of this paper is to compare, contrast, and evaluate Victor Hugo’s use of themes and characterization in his novel, Les Misérables.
Esperanza is a very strong woman in herself. Her goals are not to forget her "reason for being" and "to grow despite the concrete" so as to achieve a freedom that's not separate from togetherness.
Taymor, Julie, dir. Titus. Prod. Jody Allen. Fox Searchlight Pictures, 2000. Film. 25 Feb 2014.
Recovered memories of childhood trauma and abuse has become one of the most controversial issues within the field of psychology. Controversy surrounding repressed memory - sometimes referred to as the memory wars – reached its’ peak in the early 1990s, where there was a rise in the number of people reporting memories of childhood trauma and abuse that had allegedly been repressed for many years (Lindsay & Read, 2001). There are a number of different factors that have contributed to the dispute surrounding recovered memories. Firstly, there is an ongoing debate about whether these types of memories actually exist or whether these accusations arose as a result of suggestive therapeutic procedures. In particular, this debate focuses on two main