The House On Mango Street Sparknotes

1253 Words3 Pages

If you were given the opportunity to undergo 15 years in solitary confinement for $2 million, would you do it? This story is about a lawyer and a banker who make a bet on whether solitary confinement or the death penalty is morally right. The lawyer is driven by being able to live life even if it is uneventful, while the banker values the quality of life and the enjoyment of it. The lawyer is put into solitary confinement after this bet is made and if he makes it through, he will win $2 million. Throughout the years, the lawyer read many books and became very intelligent in many things. He also reads the Bible for a large period of time. By the time these 15 years end. The banker had been in debt due to gambling away all of his money. Due to …show more content…

This makes the banker realize the lawyers selflessness and how everything the lawyer was taught brought him to not really care about the amount of money he receives. The lawyer escapes 5 hours before the bet ends and the banker feels ashamed of himself because of how much he cares for the things that don't really matter. The banker is worse off at the end of the story because he did not really morally grow as a person. Instead, he stayed selfish. Another reason that he had it worse at the end of the story was because unlike the lawyer, the banker didn't gain any knowledge or enlightenment. In addition, the banker lost all of his wealth due to gambling away all of his money. so while the lawyer gained things, the banker lost …show more content…

As an example, in the letter the lawyer wrote to the banker before escaping, he included the phrase: “Your books have given me wisdom. All that the unresting thought of a man has created in the ages is compressed into a small compass in my brain. I know that I am wiser than all of you. Chekov, para.34. When the lawyer says e knows he is wiser than everyone, it implies that the lawyer is saying how he actually improved himself in solitary confinement, however the banker didn't. While the banker was not obtaining knowledge, the lawyer was gaining all of it. Another example that explains how he got the knowledge was when the lawyer wrote a letter saying, “My dear jailer, I write you this letter in 6 languages. Show them to people who know the language. If no mistake, fire a shot in the garden. The shot shows me that my efforts have not been thrown away (Chekov para.17). In this quote, the lawyer shows off to the banker how much he has learned through confinement so far. This quote goes on to say how within those 15 years the lawyer did something purposeful instead of wasting it. The banker, however, was technically the one that wasted 15 years gambling. Both of these quote examples compare and contrast what the lawyer gained and what the banker didn't, emphasizing what the lawyer did to have it better off by the end of the

Open Document