Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on ww2 genocides
Genocide literature review
Genocides in history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Wouldn’t it be scary if someone suddenly decided that you should disappear because he thinks you do not have the right to live because of your race or religion? Scary yes, but definitely possible. The word genocide, which is also known as ethnic cleansing, is certainly not uncommon to anyone living in this not so perfect world, full of violence, hatred and discrimination. Throughout the decades, genocide has taken place in more than one occasion, causing wars, slaughters and mass destruction of cities and towns. I think that genocide is by far the worst crime in humanity. Hatred, superiority and personal memories are all behind genocide.
Everyday, I get more surprised on how some very powerful leaders can act so cruelly and kill thousands of innocent people just because of their ethnicity, race or religion. The political leaders who committed genocide do not seem very smart to me because strong and powerful countries do not differentiate between colour and religion. Equality is the most important aspect leading to a united, strong country despite the different races or religions in that country. Instead of killing, chasing and dividing up their countries, these leaders should have created a powerful and united country.
To fully understand genocide, one must first try to define it. Genocide is “the effort to destroy the essential foundations of the life of national groups whose objectives would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups” (Charny 2). The crime of genocide dates from a very long time ago. The first time a genocide crime happened is not dated or even remembered and it is “lost in antiquity” (Charny 41). That raises the issue that maybe humans were created with all that hatred inside them. But again there is no evidence about this.
Personally, when I first heard the term genocide, the first picture that came up to my mind was the picture of the German dictator Hitler. Hitler hated Jews and saw them as the reason behind every disaster in the world. In his biography on Hitler, Schramm wrote that there is a theory explaining the reasons behind Hitler’s hatred towards Jews, he said t...
... middle of paper ...
..., yet the US acts like one strong country. Never have I heard that the Mormons in the state of Utah want their independence or that the US wants to get rid of them just because they are a minority. Also, more and more countries are joining the European Union and that is the best example on how a united continent will increase in power.
Genocide does sound like a nightmare, but unfortunately it happens all around us and it is hard to prevent it. Nazis, Turks and Serbs are just mere examples of how all human beings can act selfishly. God created all men and women equal. It does not matter whether I am black, white, Muslim, Jewish or even Buddhist. This is one world, one place and it is about time people start collaborating and live in peace despite their differences.
Works Cited
Chaliand, Gerard and Ternon Yves. The Armenians: From Genocide to Resistence. London:Zed, 1983.
Charny, Israel W. Genocide: A Critical Bibliographic Review. London: Mansell, 1988.
Harff, Barbara. Genocide and Human Rights: International Legal and Political Issues. Denver: University of Denver, 1984.
Schramm, Percy Ernst. Hitler: The Man and the Military Leader. Chicago: Quadrangle, 1971.
Millions upon millions of people were killed in the holocaust, that is just one of many genocides. There are many similarities between different genocides. Throughout history, many aggressors have started and attempted genocides and violence on the basis of someone being the "other".
Beecroft, Rachel H. "Armenian Genocide." World Without Genocide. William Mitchell College of Law, 6 Aug. 2013. Web. 14 Apr. 2014. .
Beeeeeep. The heart monitor flatlined as the pancreatic cancer patient was injected with serum by the nurse. Through a painless procedure, his suffering was permanently ended. However, the precious life of this individual was also permanently ended due the use of one controversial technology: euthanasia. Mary Shelley, author of Frankenstein, takes a stance against such advancements; she chooses to compare technology to a monster because of the way it corrupts society. The use of Euthanasia relates directly to Shelley’s view of technology; in the discussion surrounding both topics, technological advancement is discouraged due to the major implications that it places on society and the user itself.
The thing that makes the question difficult to answer is that both Heraclitus and Parmenides make valid points as to why their way is correct but at the same time they do have flaws in their view points. Heraclitus’ view on change is that he believed that the universe was dictated by logos or reason and the physical version of logos would be fire. The changing of reality was the one fundamental regularity within the universe and as a result guided Heraclitus to the notion that all things are always in a state of constant flux and the only thing that doesn’t change is change itself. Parmenides’ view on change is very different compared to Heraclitus’ view because Parmenides concluded that something that exists cannot also not exist. Parmenides
...rime of Genocide." "A Problem from Hell": America and the Age of Genocide. New York: Perennial, 2003. 62-63. Print.
SAINATI, TATIANA E. "Toward A Comparative Approach To The Crime Of Genocide." Duke Law Journal 62.1 (2012): 161-202. Academic Search Premier. Web. 25 Nov. 2013
Narration: Opponents of the death penalty believe it is an ineffective way to stop crime and that there are better ways to punish crime and keep society safe.
Springer, Jane. Genocide: A Groundwork Guide. Toronto, Ontario: Groundwood Books / House of Anansi Press, 2006. (Accessed March 7, 2014).
cases. Cases where the death penalty has been chosen as the inmates’ sentence cost $1.26 (The
Using capital punishment would put an end to the killer’s suffering, and let him leave the world peacefully. With the death penalty in place, the victim’s family can finally get closure. Families that have been through the intense experience of losing a loved one might call for lex talionis, or eye for an eye. They could believe that the killer took their loved one from them and the only acceptable recourse would be to take the murderer’s life. This retaliation for the family might be the most important reason to instill the death penalty in today’s
Death penalty might sound like the immoral thing to do; however it’s effective. When a criminal is sentence to the death sentence, it spreads fear between criminals who committed a similar crime. It also, decreases the amount of criminals that were thinking about committing that particular crime. In the article, “The Death Penalty Deters Crime and Saves Lives” Muhlhausen explains to us how death penalty sa...
By placing convicts on death row, America has found a just way of preventing repeat offenders while decreasing the rate of homicide as justice deteriorates crime rates. For instance, “There is overwhelming proof that living murderers harm and murder again, in prison and after improper release. No one disputed that living murderers are infinitely more likely to harm and murder again than are those that are executed murderers” (Williams). Accordingly, with the chance of facing the death penalty and going on death row, criminals are discouraged from committing the crime they are proceeding in, apprehensive of being placed on death row. Revealing likewise, this also shows that punishing criminals by benefiting them with shelter, food, and basic accommodations does not discourage them from committing more crimes after an improper release occurs. Continuing on, “For every inmate in America who was executed on Death Row, seven innocent lives were spared because other criminals were deterred from committing murder”(Williams)....
The fact is that the criminal had the choice between right and wrong, and by choosing to do the wrong thing, he or she gave up the right to dictate his or her future. Death penalty cases do cost extra than a life without parole sentence; however, because there are a greater number of life without parole sentences, the costs even out. The deterrence of crime that the death penalty creates is not seen very well in statistics because of some flaws in the research. Although the statistics are not in favor nor against capital punishment, common sense is in favor of the death penalty. Ernest Van Den Haag, a supporter of the death penalty once said, “People fear nothing more than death.” This fear of death has the ability to dissuade criminals. If criminals weren’t afraid of death, they wouldn’t put so much effort into receiving life in prison instead of the death penalty. Serious crimes are discouraged and deterred by the death
crime as proved by the study done by Naci Mocan. Also, as we say today “what goes around
Capital punishment can be a difficult topic to approach because people tend to have extreme views on it. The death penalty is a benefit to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves as retribution to criminals, and is in no way immoral. In general, the anti death penalty arguments often do not hold up when examined more thoughtfully. It is important that the nation is united on this issue, rather than having the it divided. The death penalty can be an incredibly advantageous apparatus in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society. It is crucial that we begin to pass legislation making capital punishment legal throughout the United States so that justice can be served properly.