More handpicked essays just for you.
Books vs movies compare contrast
Analysis the character of Bilbo Baggins 3000 words paper
Books vs movies compare contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Books vs movies compare contrast
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey People quite often say that books are a lot better than movies are. In most cases this statement is true, including The Hobbit. The movie is told from Bilbo’s perspective, which completely changes the movie up. When we meet the characters in the movie they don’t have hats, they do not greet Bilbo like we think they do, and some of them do not even have overcoats. In the film Bilbo looks nothing like the book portrayed him to look like. Frodo does appear in the movie, Bilbo informs Frodo about an adventure he had went on a long time ago. Also Fili and Kili looked nothing alike in the movie which had me second-guessing myself on who they were a couple of times. Gandalf never approached Bilbo about coming on
an adventure. Thorin, one of the dwarves on the adventure, was the last dwarf to arrive at Bilbo’s house and arrived alone. The movie never gives an explanation of why Bilbo decided to go on the adventure, which leaves many viewers wondering why Bilbo did go on the journey. Bilbo goes after a group of goblins because they stole their ponies and ate them, not because he was going to steal from them. Also Gandalf gives Bilbo the knife that he stole in the book. During the Warg attack Bilbo climbs the trees with ease and needs no help. All of the dwarves end up on a single tree and as the fire rages the Pale Orc arrives and wants to kill Thorin. Bilbo fights him with his tiny sword until the eagles swoop in and saves all of the dwarves including Thorin.
For example, in the book, Grendel attacks due to his aversion to God whilst in the movie Grendel’s actions are due to his hypersensitive state. This change in story takes God out of the picture giving a filtered and non secular viewpoint. Additionally, in the book, when Grendel slays the Danes in the night, he does so while they're sleeping. Whereas in the movie he simply bursts into Heorot, while all Danes bear witness, killing, eating, and bludgeoned everyone and anyone. Painting a bloodier and darker aspect to Grendel than the original story. Another example would be when Grendel’s arm is ripped off, Beowulf does so with his bare hands in the book. In the movie Grendel’s arm is severed as he is fleeing Heorot, torn and ripped from its body as the door was forcibly shut on
It is a fool-proof system born to ensure absolute safety…but when it crumbles, would you go against everything it stands for just to save it? This is the platform that Philip K. Dick, author of the sci-fi short story "The Minority Report" (MR), has given us. Set in a futuristic New York City, we see Police Commissioner John A. Anderton as the founder of a promising new branch of policing: Precrime, a system that uses "Precogs" (mutated and retarded oracles) to predict all future crimes. However, the system appears to backfire when Anderton himself is accused to kill a man he's never even heard of. The movie adaptation by the same name also centers on a younger Chief Anderton, a respected employee of Precrime, predicted to murder a complete stranger who he was unaware existed. Amidst scandal, betrayal, and distrust, both Andertons must run from the justice system they've worked so hard to put in place, and admit to themselves, as well as to society, that a perfect system cannot be born of imperfect humans. Though the basis of the film's plot and major conflict stayed true to the story's, many changes were made to the personalities and roles of the characters, as well as the nature and detail of the main conflict and the sub-conflicts.
“The Glass Castle” based of the memoir written by Jeannette Walls, the movie was directed by Destin Daniel Cretton, and the writing credits include Cretton, Andrew Lanham, and of course Jeannette Walls. Released on August 13th, 2017, twelve years after the memoir was published. When I was told we were reviewing the movie version of “The Glass Castle” I was hesitant on being amazed by it, this is due to movies are never exactly like the book. The Atlantic released an article titled, “The Trouble with Making Books We Love into Movies” and in it the explain why the people who read the book don’t always get what they want, stating, “The movie is the adaptation
In The Hobbit, four races, live a tumultuous world where dragons and magic take place, these four races hobbits, dwarves, elves, and humans. They’re different and yet alike, among many different aspects. The Hobbit by J.R.R Tolkien, is about Bilbo Baggins, a hobbit, who is enlisted into an adventure with a Thorin & Co. a group of Dwarves, and Gandalf a wizard. Through his journey, he would encounter many new things and come out a different person. The many races and their distinct differences stack against each other and make for an interesting set of people and morals with those people.
The Glass Castle follows the life of the Walls family, providing insight into their strange, yet non-fictional lives. Both the book and movie portrayals focus specifically on Jeanette, the writer of the novel and the movie’s protagonist. The story starts in New York, focusing on Jeanette’s life as a successful writer living in luxury. She has a seemingly perfect life - until it is interrupted after spotting her homeless parents rifling through the trash as she drove by in a cab. The book and movie go into flashback, telling the story of her rough childhood and the ways in which she and her siblings stuck together to avoid extreme poverty and a lifestyle of nomadity.
A movie that came out in 2002 was Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. This movie was based off the best-selling novel, which was written in 1997 by J.K. Rowling, called Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. If you were to read this book and watch the movie you would find many differences, but the main difference between the two is that the book gives more information to the reader than the movie gives to the viewer. If someone was to watch the movie instead of reading the book, that person would not be able to have an accurate perception of the book because so many things in the book are changed in the movie or parts are left out of the movie completely. This is mainly because the book has more characters and chapters, which are able to keep the reader informed and interested. Still, the movie is shorter so that people who want a quick summary of the storyline can get it,
There is a famous expression about three demands of writing fiction. It goes, “Make them laugh, make them cry, make them wait.” By following these needs, an author can spark interest in his or her work. In the novels The Catcher in the Rye and Lord of the Rings, the novelists utilize the latter requirement, “Make them wait.” This essay will show how the authors use that specific demand in their novels.
J.R.R. Tolkien was able to successfully capture the essence of Anglo-Saxon literature throughout The Lord of The Rings Trilogy. Though he wrote these books decades later, Tolkien used his knowledge and interest of Anglo-Saxon times to create this mythical, dark, and adventurous tale. Tolkien showed many themes of which were often seen in books written during the Anglo-Saxon time period (450 A.D. – 1066 A.D.) He drew much of his inspiration from the epic poem Beowulf, which is seen all throughout The Lord of The Rings. This book is known as the greatest prime example of literature from that time period. He used similar Anglo-Saxon themes such as Good versus Evil, Christianity versus Paganism, and lastly, the idea of courage and loyalty. Tolkien, fascinated by Anglo-Saxon literature, used similar context, themes, and ideas to create a parallel between Beowulf and The Lord of The Rings.
The three selections that will be explained are Barrio Boy, The king of Mazy May, and The Hobbit. Undertaking dangerous missions can be difficult, the satisfaction of knowing that you're a good person by helping others, and yourself, drives people to undertake a mission. Different people have different situations that make people have to have different levels of courage and bravery. A good cause should be important, or something that you or somebody else cares about.
One of the biggest debates for book and movie lovers is “the book was better than the movie” or “the movie was better than the book.” I’m a movie and book lover and I often find myself having this debate.It’s a debate that can go either way and it often ends in a disagreement between the fans discussing the book or movie. The book is better than the movie and there are plenty of films from the past ten years that exhibit this.
It is not uncommon for movies to take some creative license when adapting a novel for a cinematic film. The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien is a story about the antics of a hobbit and his dwarven companions. Peter Jackson, a famous director, took this book and turned it into a three-part movie series. As The Hobbit, is a relatively short book, it is not a stretch to assume Jackson made some changes to the films. After viewing The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, and The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies, it is clear to see the differences between the book and the movie.
It is likely for one to assume that a classic piece of literature set in a fantasy oriented stage will have no merits to the youths of today. The Hobbit by J. R. R. Tolkien, however, with its crafty of usage symbolism, displays its relevance to issues that often trouble teens. As the story progresses from a children’s tale to an epic, the main character Bilbo undergoes a series of development, his experiences often overlapping with ordinary people. Reading the Hobbit will provide teens with opportunities of exploring the importance of several common but serious topics. People may encounter many of the themes presented in the book elsewhere repeatedly, but it’s possible that they never appreciated the applications it might have on themselves. When teens read the Hobbit, they perceive it as a simple fiction of adventure. Under proper guiding, they will be able to recognize and utilize the lessons of the Hobbit, and improve their attitudes and ideas about life.
In 1937 J. R. R. Tolkien introduced the world to a boring unadventurous hobbit by the name of Bilbo Baggins with his novel The Hobbit. Bilbo Baggins does the unpredictable and goes on a journey with Thorin and Company to recover the stolen treasure. Bilbo isn't the only unorthodox mythological hero. Up to the present time it was not long ago that J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was published. In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone we are introduced to a mettlesome young wizard known as Harry Potter. Harry Potter continues his family legacy and joins other young wizard and witches at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Although, both are like night and day in many ways Bilbo Baggins and Harry Potter are comparable.
The movie takes place in Middle-earth in the Kingdom of Erebor in the Lonely Mountain where the evil dragon Smaug has taken the kingdom from the dwarfs. And is where the battle for the kingdom and the blue stone (forgot what it was called) will take place. This is in the times of dragons. The dragon Smaug toke and now lives in the kingdom of Erebor in the lonely mountain where the dwarfs use to live until Smaug forced them out. Twelve homeless dwarfs lead by their former king Thorin and the wizard Gandalf the gray visit the young Hobbit Bilbo Baggins and decide to vanquish Smaug and recover Erebor and their treasure. Bilbo joins the company in an unexpected journey through dangerous lands of the Middle-Earth where they have to fight against Trolls, Orcs and other magic creatures. Bilbo also meets the Gollum and finds his lost magic ring. On their journey to the castle they lose grand. Once they reach the castle and all seems lost in the fight against Smaug Bilbo puts the lost ring on his finger and vanishes into thin air or so it seems but really the ring just made Bilbo invisible. An army of darkness heads to a kingdom.
L. Frank Baum published the original book, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, in 1900. The movie, The Wizard of Oz, was made in 1939. There are several differences between Baum’s book and the movie. One of the main differences is that the movie leaves out the back-stories of the Scarecrow, the Tin Man, and the Lion. Without reading the book, we would never know why the Scarecrow wants a brain. These are essential questions that need to be answered. By providing the back-story, the audience gains a better understanding of these characters; and why they want these things. Another difference between these two mediums, is Dorothy’s iconic ruby slippers; or are they silver? The movie depicts them as ruby slippers, but in the original book, they are actually supposed to be silver.