Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book and movie comparison
Comparing and contrasting a novel and movie
Book and movie comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book and movie comparison
With various weeks of on and off reading and a brief analysis after several handfuls of chapters The High Window kept me on the edge of the seat, but fell short to effectively reach its full potential with the conclusion conclusively being the issue. With a vague and left in the air conclusion for certain characters Chandler didn’t completely satisfy me as a reader but didn’t ultimately lose me. He aimed the novel away from typical cliché mystery novels and took a different approach toward a mixed styled inverted detective story and whodunit novel. Unlike similar novels, however The High Window briefly reflected how the real world actually is and kept away from being too fiction although being a novel. Despite that, with the conclusion my major complaint Chandler makes up for the brief and rushed conclusion by giving the reader a slight resemblance of how life literally is and as a mystery novel Chandler goes beyond boundaries and explicitly displays how cruel and dark society can actually get.
Nonetheless, despite being a surprisingly acceptable novel I noted that at times novels are occasionally dragged out and can frequently be skipped around. With The High Window concisely supporting this observation, the novel is bluntly understood after reading the first three chapters and the last three chapters of the novel instead of going over all 36 chapters. This in my opinion is irritating as a reader, but is comprehensible since the novel revolves
…show more content…
around mystery and is ideally supposed to hook the reader instead of urging the reader to skip around. However, I feel like Chandler’s unordinary writing style conclusively hooks the reader and although defined by an anonymous source Chandler depicts his novel toward a blended inverted detective story and a whodunit type novel. As a result, it’s safe to say Chandler develops a well blended novel, but rushes several character plots and forgets about others. However, this isn’t uncommon with the genre he’s working with and although it does bug readers like me Chandler is able to ultimately answer the major questions about Marlowe’s case. Despite that like most things, everything eventually comes to an end, unfortunately but for The High Window I felt as if the ending wasn’t enough or pleasing. While wrapping up on the last few chapters of The High Window and eventually reaching page 265 I felt as if the novel was missing a few additional chapters to fully understanding the anticipated climax and pending resolution. With a sense of what’s next for Marlowe left in the open Chandler focused more on other characters and didn’t develop much of a background story for the protagonist. With this in mind, it’s slightly understandable with The High Window being considered an array of incidents of Marlowe, Chandler utilizes past and future novels to further perceive Marlowe and how he fits into the bizarre cases a private eye like himself takes on. Despite that, shifting back to my complaint was the conclusion. The conclusion for me somewhat seemed as a sense of a different story with no mystery just extra. It was rather vague, but subtle as it aimed away from the havoc and chaos of the case ultimately creating the mystery less mysterious. Nonetheless, with a romantic side of Chandler attempting to split from the novels ominous ambient, he only eventually fails after Marlowe’s remorseful dissatisfaction of how the case resulted was brought up. This in fact angered me like most readers would agree despite being a dark novel, we would hope for some sort of happy ending. But that wasn’t the case. Chandler in fact used this time to show the reader an important rule of thumb about life, it isn’t fair. Seeing Marlowe and Merle together would have made the novel slightly better, but Chandler goes beyond a boundary where most fiction authors tend to stay from and that’s tying their novel to actual life. Although fiction deprives from imagination rather than fact or history Chandler’s unorthodox style of writing is actually favorable. While using his protagonist’s remorseful decision to leave Merle a letdown for readers saying, “I had a funny feeling as I saw the house disappear, as though I had written a poem and it was very good and I had lost it and would never remember it again.” (Chandler 262). Chandler ultimately creates a slight motif which I find incredibly interesting. As Marlowe looks back at what he conclusively let go away, he feels resentment and the decision of giving Leslie a “get out of jail free card” a sense of displeasure. With this in mind Chandler reflects Marlowe’s emotions with similar experiences we as readers can relate to when dealing with decisions that will benefit some but affect others. To close, The High Window was an enjoyable novel, but the conclusion was my ultimate complaint.
It had a great plot with a memorable protagonist and upheld the mysterious atmosphere throughout the novel. Chandler’s ability to keep readers like myself on the edge of the seat was exciting as the novel unfolded with a blended style of unorthodox writing. As a result, Chandler was able to go past boundaries and tie his novel with the real world and as a reader, I could relate to experiences Marlowe had to endure and
decide.
The diverse alternation of point of views also provides the story an effective way to reach out to readers and be felt. The characterisation is effectively done and applied as Sam, Grace, and the other supporting characters play individual, crucial roles in the course of the story. All the elements of a typical young adult novel, consisting of a gap-filled relationship between children and parents, emotion-driven teenagers, and a unique conflict that makes the book distinct from fellow novels, combined with the dangerous consequences of the challenges the couple encounter, make the book different from all other of the same genre. The plot unfolds slowly giving readers enough time to adjust and anticipate the heavy conflict when it arises. It has gotten us so hooked but the only thing we could possibly dislike about it was the slow pace of plot. The anticipation was too much to handle and we were practically buzzing and bouncing to know how the story turns out as we read. It builds the anticipation, excitement, thrill, sadness, grief, loss, and longing in such an effective way to entice and hook readers further into the world of Sam and
...onally transposing indirect to direct quotation, putting words into people mouths and blending two separate eye witness's accounts. How can one read a novel for knowledge gaining purposes when the structure appears so flawed? The use of modern and old English are combined in the sentence structure. The highly academic vocabulary not only is confusing, but breaks the flow of the book when that is the evident purpose for the format of the book. The confusing order in which Starkey retells events and the ineffective and useless information that is put in for building character personalities.
The parts that I found boring were when there was a lot of description going on from the author. I do realize that it is necessary to set up the scenes and locations so that us as readers can have a better understanding of what is happening in the book, however I felt like at times he went too far into detail and had me nearly sleeping at times, literally.
...nd enjoyable. The one thing that did bug me was that Youngs does not directly tie his thesis directly to the end of the book. It would have been helpful for the reader to be able to confirm Youngs’s intention for writing the book, but since he fails to re-introduce his argument in the end, it left me questioning that intention.
The ending of the novel was inspiring. The author suggests the reader to look into great novels, and even supplies a list of novels a personally suggests. He ended with a very ...
This is my personal reflection about this book. First and foremost, I would like to say that this book is very thick and long to read. There are about nineteen chapters and 278 pages altogether. As a slow reader, it is a quite hard for me to finish reading it within time. It took me weeks to finish reading it as a whole. Furthermore, it is written in English version. My English is just in average so sometimes I need to refer to dictionary for certain words. Sometimes I use google translate and ask my friends to explain the meaning of certain terms.
Typically, a novel contains four basic parts: a beginning, middle, climax, and the end. The beginning sets the tone for the book and introduces the reader to the characters and the setting. The majority of the novel comes from middle where the plot takes place. The plot is what usually captures the reader’s attention and allows the reader to become mentally involved. Next, is the climax of the story. This is the point in the book where everything comes together and the reader’s attention is at the fullest. Finally, there is the end. In the end of a book, the reader is typically left asking no questions, and satisfied with the outcome of the previous events. However, in the novel The Things They Carried the setup of the book is quite different. This book is written in a genre of literature called “metafiction.” “Metafiction” is a term given to fictional story in which the author makes the reader question what is fiction and what is reality. This is very important in the setup of the Tim’s writing because it forces the reader to draw his or her own conclusion about the story. However, this is not one story at all; instead, O’Brien writes the book as if each chapter were its own short story. Although all the chapters have relation to one another, when reading the book, the reader is compelled to keep reading. It is almost as if the reader is listening to a “soldier storyteller” over a long period of time.
...it up to each reader to draw their own conclusions and search their own feelings. At the false climax, the reader was surprised to learn that the quite, well-liked, polite, little convent girl was colored. Now the reader had to evaluate how the forces within their society might have driven such an innocent to commit suicide.
I think my favorite thing about this novel was the realistic ending. Some books try to just give you a fairy tale but this book had an ending that mad you think in the end if I was in the same position would I do the same thing. I didn’t like the fact that the novel portrayed mental illness in a way to say that it needed to be hidden and protected. I thought this novel was very believable for the time period that it was set in. I think the ending to this novel was perfect it was an accurate ending to this
A normal novel has smooth transition. Vonnegut wrote this book without any smooth transition. This novel is very complicated. The topics that are mention are hard to understand. The book was a bit difficult to follow. Slaughter House-Five's character's needs more depth. More description is necessary. There was too much jumping around in time in Billy’s life. I thought that this book was going to be better than it actually was.
I thoroughly enjoyed this novel and believe it to be one of the best books I have ever read. It was extremely well written and challenging for me to understand at times. It conveys that dark side of human ambition very well, and it has given me much to think about.
Kempf’s reading style is also a strong positive to this novel; he uses a fair amount of transitional phrasing and adjectives to really paint a vivid picture for the reader. A lot of sifi readers don’t properly portray their vision of the fictional world they’ve created and therefore it becomes hard for the reader to correctly envision where the author wants to take him or
The novel progresses at rapid rate and the irregular pace can be likened to that of a drug addiction novel. As if the author himself in select chapters in the book has decided to 'shoot up on smack' before typing away on his keyboard. The other way the n...
In a nutshell: Beautifully written, with a fantastic twisted plot, but I personally wish the love triangle had played a smaller role.
Structurally speaking the novel is divided into three parts with the unequal lengths of time covered by each of three sections. The first and the third -`The Window' and `The Lighthouse' each occupy less than a day. On the other hand, the middle section, `Time Passes' deals with a span of about ten years. But, there is coherence in the structure, first and third part are well connected. This unity is achieved by the power of an individual's mind to bring all elements of living and feeling together and make sense of them; Lily Briscoe mainly plays this part in the last section. Secondly, the apparent device of ending the `The Window' on night and starting the `The lighthouse' with morning unite the two sections.