Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reasons why people commit crimes
An essay explaining why lizzie borden is guilty
An essay explaining why lizzie borden is guilty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reasons why people commit crimes
Lizzie Borden is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of slaughtering her father and stepmother in cold blood.
She had very compelling motives for doing this. One of her motives was that she had a lot to gain, including upwards of $10 million in today’s money (“9 things you may not know about Lizzie Borden” p. 1), which would be like winning the lottery if she got the money by legitimate means. This would be very good for her because, even though her father had $10 million (in todays money), he didn’t invest in amenities such as indoor plumbing and other such amenities (“9 things you may not know about Lizzie Borden” p.1). That coupled with the copious amount of money that she would have inherited would definitely make some one at least consider
…show more content…
Her alibi changed most of the times she told it, first stating she “...was in the barn...to get a piece of iron” , then she said she had been“...eating pears under a tree...” , and she also claimed she had “...been in her room mending lace...” (“Could A Women Do That?” p.43-45). When her alibi changed, it showed that she was possibly lying because if she was telling the truth, she would have a memory of what she was doing at the time and not have to try and memorize what she had said before. Unless Lizzie Borden had an amazing memory, she wouldn’t have been able to remember that, and she obviously didn’t because her alibi changed when she was asked about it. And she couldn’t have been doing all of that at the same …show more content…
There was an axe that had a freshly broken handle and the blade was covered in ashes, implying that it had recently been cleaned and then put in a fire as to cover the fact that it had been cleaned (“Could A Women Do That?” p.45). Because the blade had been cleaned, it implies that it was used as the murder weapon because if it had been cleaned, it wouldn’t be suspected to have been used as the weapon because it didn’t have anything that could relate it to the crime. Also, some people say that Lizzie couldn’t have done it because she wouldn’t have been able to hide the weapon, but this shows that she just cleaned it instead of hiding it, which she would have had ample time for in the ninety minutes between
The first reason that Lizzie Borden is guilty is that Lizzie Borden switched up her story many times. In the inquest testimony Lizzie says “I was in the kitchen” (3). She was asked if she was sure about that and then she changed her story. She said she couldn’t remember if she was in there or in the dining room (3). Lizzie then changes her answer again
When she was falsely accused in her case, the FBI thought she was the one who started it all. The FBI didn’t look at all of the evidence that was found at the crime or what she had said. They falsely accused her of the crime because they thought she was the one that robbed the bank and did extortion. There were gaps in her statement, and she couldn’t think straight. She was saying random words because she was so terrified of what happened to her. The SLA brainwashed her, and she didn’t know anything after they were done with her. She didn’t even know what day it was, so she does not know what happened in her case.
Lizzie was well aware of the disadvantages of being a woman condemned to a narrow societal image and used her unrecognized intelligence to her advantage. By murdering her father and stepfather she was able to gain everything she could have wanted; a large house on the hill, tremendous wealth, and rid herself of a detested stepmother. Although it is a morbid circumstance, Lizzie Borden proved herself to be a clever women of her era. She played the male system, knowing that regardless of what the facts say, the male ego was much more powerful. To question moral, innocent Lizzie meant the men in power must question their ways of thinking and everything they had worked so hard to create, the perfect woman.
When viewed from a strictly medical, psychological aspect, Andrea Yates medical history indicates that after the birth of her first child, she began to suffer from various forms of depression and suicide attempts. If one only examines the paper trail and doesn’t think beyond what the medical history does or does not indicate, then perhaps, Andrea would be innocent by reason of mental insanity as the 2006 acquittal suggest. However, when viewed form a legal aspect there are several inconstancies that challenge if this former nurse was insane or if she in fact premeditated the murder of her children as well as her acquittal.
lived in demanded her to give up her conspirator or bear the consequences of the
The most essential and influential part to revolutionary societal change is martyrdom. Martyrdom is the most important part for a societal change to happen because the significance of multiple dying for their beliefs brings more attention to the injustice, hence a change in society, laws, and culture occur.
There are many ways to decide what makes a man guilty. In an ethical sense, there is more to guilt than just committing the crime. In Charles Brockden Browns’ Wieland, the reader is presented with a moral dilemma: is Theodore Wieland guilty of murdering his wife and children, even though he claims that the command came from God, or is Carwin guilty because of his history of using persuasive voices, even though his role in the Wieland family’s murder is questionable? To answer these questions, one must consider what determines guilt, such as responsibility, motives, consequences, and the act itself. No matter which view is taken on what determines a man’s guilt, it can be concluded that Wieland bears the fault in the murder of Catharine Wieland and her children.
what they believe. This is shown when she subsequently identified him at trial ("A.B. Butler"). She
Mary Surratt lied to the authorities. She lied about knowing Lewis Paine, according to A Burned Letter. This shows that Mrs. Surratt lied to keep Paine out of trouble, but they both got arrested anyways. Also according to A Burned Letter, during the first police visit, Mary Surratt didn’t seem to care about Abraham Lincoln’s assassination. The second visit was drastically different. She seemed utterly shocked with the news of president Lincoln’s assassination. This indicates that Mrs. Surratt knew about the plot and blatantly lied to the authorities.
Guilt is powerful thing. A person’s whole life can be destroyed seconds after being exposed to the strength of guilt. Even though admitting a sin can seem more difficult than not, that confession can often make a world of difference in the long run. In The Scarlet Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne, Hester Prynne, and Reverend Dimmesdale, have two very different ways of dealing with guilt. These differences in action are what change the courses of their lives. The actions taken by one character are successful, though the actions of the other put his life in ruins. Hester confesses her sin in public, while Dimmesdale does not. This simple choice made causes a drastic change in each of their lives. When comparing the lives of Hester and Dimmesdale,
Did she lie about her alibi? YES, she was in the house not the barn
In the Crucible there are many shameful characters, but for me the most shameful is Abigail. I find two reasons that Abigail is the most shameful character because she got all of her friends to perform cruel rituals with her in the forest, and to top all that her and her friends all lied about not doing this cruel ritual and put other people's lives in jeopardy.
“We must tell the truth Abby! You’ll only be whipped for dancin’ and other things!”. This was said by Mary Warren in The Crucible. It shows two of her character traits, that she is anxious and honest. Mary Warren was a teenage girl caught in the wrong place at the wrong time while she was “just watching” her friends dance in the woods. Throughout the play she was very conflicted with whether she should tell the truth or follow what Abigail told her to do. I can relate to Mary Warren because we both can be anxious, we have tendencies to be a follower rather than a leader, and we both can be honest.
Often we are told that our wrongdoings will prevent us from going to heaven. In the world of religion, the people who act as saints are the ones who achieve a celestial life. However, that does not put a halt to people’s sinful acts. Sins often make us feel a sort of pleasure and happiness in the moment, yet our guilt overshadows those thoughts afterwards. It is the thought of doing something outrageous that excites us, not the action of doing it. In spite of this, one cannot expect a person to be fully virtuous for that is not how nature molded us. Achieving happiness from a corrupted act becomes a problem, once it is done constantly, but I see no wrongdoing in gaining some contentment once in awhile from our vices. Consequently, I believe there is no way to solve the problem completely, only ways to diminish it by reminding ourselves that guilt may haunt us sometimes.
“For him the universe did not extend beyond the circumference of her petticoat” (Flaubert) Madame Bovary is a nineteenth century novel that explores the life, decisions, and downfall of Emma Bovary. Gustave Flaubert elegantly describes Madame’s viewpoint through her tasteless actions of deceit and laundering, as well as her dissatisfaction towards her marriage. Though nearly every action is consumed with how Emma perceived it and what part Emma had to play in it, the narcissistic air of the writing does not overwhelm her husband’s, Charles, important role in the ultimate collapse of their marriage. In fact, Charles’ character is the ember that sparks the fire which ends in the collapse of their marriage and his emotional downfall. His characterization, described by Emma, not only drives Emma’s downfall but his own as well.