Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on the invention of electricity
Reflection about the history of electricity
Reflection about the history of electricity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on the invention of electricity
A history of how society masters, uses and abuses electricity, and the ultimate expansion of electricity across North America, are Phillip F. Schewe's main subjects in The Grid: A Journey through the Heart of Our Electrified World. Phillip Schewe holds a Ph.D. in particle physics and is the Chief Science Writer for the American Institute of Physics. He has written for numerous national magazines and newspapers. When not engaged in research or scholarly writing, the author is an accomplished playwright whose plays have been staged in New York and Washington, D.C. The modern Grid is the industrial age’s greatest achievement, and Schewe has tried to explain how people in the modern world have come to take it for granted. In this book, he has brought …show more content…
Schewe compels the audience to think about how it would feel to be in a situation where elevators and subways suddenly stopped working, people are forced to sit in darkness in homes and offices with no televisions, computers, or air conditioning. It was both interesting and scary to read about how as many as 50 million people took electricity for granted before the backout, and still continue to do so, because of how prevalent it has been in our lives. He explains how we have always taken electricity for granted, just like “the air we breathe”. But after all the hardships caused because of the Blackout, people started to think about how and why electricity should not be taken for granted. Schewe has done a wonderful job of educating his audience of complicated theories and terminology of electricity by breaking them down, and using very colorful comparisons and metaphors. For example, he describes how the presence of charge in electricity could spread itself miles away, “like tasting the tartness of a lemon without having the lemon”. He explains to us how important Thoreau, poets and historians are as well, as they have helped us to tell us what our technology
In doing so, he ensures that the readers walk away from his writing thinking of the unnecessarity of technology and how it distracts one from nature. He encourages the reader to think about what they can do to minimize the amount of technology in their life so they may be more attuned to nature. In short, Robert Louv wisely uses rhetorical devices to form a persuasive
If we would see above the earth, clouds swirling above the earth and how everything is in motion. He talks about cells and how they can catch energy. The earth made its own membrane and needed time for the formation of oxygen.
The United States, as well as the world, is more and more dependent on electronics. Everything around us runs on electricity; from the cars we drive, our dependency on mobile electronics we use, all the way down to the cappuccino machines that make our favorite beverages. We love our electronics. Last year alone “retail sales of consumer electronics fell just short of $1 trillion in 2011,” reports John Laposky of TWICE magazine, and those sales “are predicted to hit $1.04 trillion in 201...
Barry opens up this section with a metaphor, stating that “all real scientists exist on the frontier,” and continuing on to compare scientific research to the western frontier. As the western frontier was new and undiscovered in early America until people became bold enough to venture out there, scientific research is new and undiscovered as well until one has the boldness to explore the work. This metaphor relating to the frontier allows Barry to clearly paint a picture of his characterization of scientific research. As he continues on in explaining the unknown, Barry writes a series of rhetorical questions relating to the metaphor of the frontier. As the rhetorical questions continuously follow one another, they mimic the job a scientist would have in inquiring date within an experiment. These questions not only make the reader think thoroughly about the roles of scientists, but also force the reader to think like a scientist his or herself. This comparison of scientific research to the frontier, as well as the rhetorical questions within it, allow Barry to portray the unknown factor within science, emphasizing the boldness and curiosity a great scientist must have in order to be truly
In the passage from All the Light We Cannot See, Anthony Doerr conveys the bleak reality of growing up during the economic collapse in Essen, Germany during the 1930’s. The passage focuses on Werner and Jutta, two siblings living in a children’s home during this era. Doerr’s heavy use of imagery, especially his description of the miners, foreshadows an eventual loss of innocence for both children. Additionally, Doerr uses foil to emphasize the contrast between the perspectives of the children and miners and to highlight the deteriorating conditions in Essen.
The author wrote a book about what he went through as a young boy so many years ago and how he overcame so many problems that he went through.
This paper is a discussion of the role played by the ideals of the Enlightenment in the invention and assessment of artifacts like the electric battery. The first electric battery was built in 1799 by Alessandro Volta, who was both a natural philosopher and an artisan-like inventor of intriguing machines. I will show that the story of Volta and the battery contains three plots, each characterized by its own pace and logic. One is the story of natural philosophy, a second is the story of artifacts like the battery, and the third is the story of the loose, long-term values used to assess achievement and reward within and outside expert communities. An analysis of the three plots reveals that late eighteenth-century natural philosophers, despite their frequent celebration of 'useful knowledge,' were not fully prepared to accept the philosophical dignity of artifacts stemming from laboratory practice. Their hesitation was the consequence of a hierarchy of ranks and ascribed competence that was well established within the expert community. In order to make artifacts stemming from laboratory practice fully acceptable within the domain of natural philosophy, some important changes had yet to occur. Still, the case overwhelmingly shows that artifacts rightly belong to the long and varied list of items that make up the legacy of the Enlightenment.
mistakes are not caused by him, but by the adult world. This book is totally opposite of
about the past. Toward the end of the book the quote, “He would come back some day; they
Wind is a great renewable source, but just out of reach, literally. The best wind is soaring high above, out of reach, and we do not have windmills that tower high enough to reach the wind that will produce worthwhile electricity. However, I object to his theory that we have reached our limit of resources and innovations. I speculate that we do not know everything and have not created nor discovered every possible answer or resource to the world’s energy crisis.
Throughout Thomson’s life he made many contributions to science. These include discoveries in thermodynamics and the age of the Earth, as well as innovating the Transatlantic Cable and inventing a tide meter. After exploring thermodynamics for some time, he developed the second law of thermodynamics. This law states that there cannot be a reaction that is completely efficient; a portion of the energy is lost to heat in each reaction. It also says that heat flows to areas that...
...free thought to a degree that has never before been available to us. This will bring about a new age of enlightenment, so to speak. He concludes by saying ‘the sea, our sea, lies open again; maybe there has never been such an open sea.’
Note how he lumps together "phantasm, species, or whatever". This is very sloppy, but influential nonetheless. And notice how he maintains that the object of our knowledge is the idea, and not real being (as it was for the Greek and Mediaeval thinkers).
Of all the scientists to emerge from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries there is one whose name is known by almost all living people. While most of these do not understand this mans work, everyone knows that his impact on the world is astonishing.
Humbled at last by his enemies, the father of modern science wasn’t wholly subdued. His discoveries impacted the world as we see it. Without his sacrifice and motive to fight for what he believed in, we wouldn’t be as advanced as we are today in modern science. Although society advanced by increased knowledge, having more scientific answers, and increased new developments because of the freedom to deviate from established theories, there were some negative effects. Society had lost their innocence and belief in their traditional faith. Galileo’s battle against the Church was worthwhile for generations to come. Without his inventions, theories, or introduction to the concept of theory experimenting, the world of modern science wouldn’t exist as we know it today.