Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Meaning and nature of psychology
Define psychology
Define psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The novella Turn of the Screw was written by Henry James and originally published in 1898. The story is a ghost tale, involving a Governess and two children. There is much debate as whether the Governess in this story is sane or insane. According to Oxford Dictionaries, insanity is a “state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior, and social interaction” (Oxford Dictionaries). The Governess can be considered insane since she has disturbed perceptions, exhibits abnormal behavior, and has unnatural social interactions. The Governess is insane since her perception is impaired. Throughout the novel, the Governess claims that there are ghosts haunting her and the children. For example, while the Governess and Mrs. Grose are by the lake, …show more content…
the Governess believes that there is a ghost watching them. Despite the Governess’s beliefs, Mrs. Grose states, “She isn’t there, little lady, and nobody’s there-and you never see nothing, my sweet” (James 71). Mrs. Grose holds firm that there is no ghost. This occurrence demonstrates how the Governess is insane since she sees a ghost that Mrs. Grose cannot see. The most reasonable explanation is that the ghosts are a figment of the Governess’s imagination. Another instance that demonstrates the Governess’s flawed perception is when she thinks Flora can see the ghost but is keeping it to herself. In response to Mrs. Grose asking if Flora has admitted to seeing a ghost, she says, “She kept it to herself… she was perfectly aware” (James 30). Here, the delusional Governess believes that Flora sees the ghosts even though Flora never says she can see them and never shows any hard behavioral evidence that she can see them. The Governess imagines these ghosts and tries to push her beliefs onto the other characters, making her insane. The argument that the Governess is insane is supported by the fact that her behavior becomes abnormal after she starts to see the supposed ghosts.
One behavioral issue that highlights the Governess’s insanity is her constant obsession with the children. For example, while watching over Miles, she thinks to herself, “what, under my endless obsession, I had been impelled to listen for was some betrayal of his not being at rest” (James 61). This quote exemplifies the Governess’s abnormal paranoia as she stays up and listens to Miles because she crazily suspects him of working with the ghosts and being possessed by them. This idea manifests in her head because she believes that since the children were close to Peter Quint and Miss Jessel before, the ghosts must be back for the children. The Governess just assumes this of the children, despite evidence of the contrary as they are described as pure and beautiful children in the beginning of the story and always deny the presence of the ghosts. Furthermore, the Governess’s insanity and obsession with the children manifests itself into more physical occurrences. For example, she physically handles Flora when she “[grips the] little girl with a spasm” (James 41). The Governess cannot control her behavior and grabs Flora because she believes that Flora is lying about her knowledge about the ghosts. The Governess’s delusions cause her to be physical with Flora, even though she is supposed to be her caretaker. This physical action …show more content…
strays away from acceptable discipline, since Flora does nothing wrong and it is just the Governess that imagines Flora’s wrongdoing of being with the ghosts. The Governess’s insane behavior is not only unwarranted, it negatively affects the children in very real ways. The Governess is also insane since she exhibits unnatural social interactions. The Governess has issues conveying her feelings and making rational decisions. When the Governess consults Mrs. Grose about seeing the ghosts, Mrs. Grose suggests contacting the Uncle for assistance. However, the Governess refuses to bother the Uncle, since she wants to maintain her undertaking to “give [the Uncle] no worry” (James 48). Although this seems noble on the outside, the Governess’s decision is not the best considering the circumstances. If any other sane person were in charge, they would have contacted the Uncle immediately if they believed ghosts to be threatening the safety of the children. Even with the possibility of the Uncle not believing her, the Governess should have contacted him since she truly believed that the children were in danger. After all, the Uncle is the only family the children have. The Governess also interacts abnormally when she encounters the ghost of Miss Jessel. When she thinks she sees Miss Jessel in the room, the Governess addresses her, “You terrible… woman!” (James 58). Given the Governess’s behavior throughout the story of being paranoid about the ghosts and freezing up with any encounter of them, it would be expected for her to be terrified of Miss Jessel and flee. Instead, she starts talking to the ghost and believes she can communicate with her. The Governess not only believes in ghosts, but she starts interacting with them. The Governess’s behavior with Miss Jessel shows how much the Governess’s belief in these ghosts has changed her ability to act and make decisions in a natural manner. Some proponents of the Governess’s sanity may argue that at the end of the novel, Miles can see the ghost as he yells “Peter Quint-you devil,” validating the Governess’s sanity (James 86).
However, even though Miles yells this out, he cannot actually see any ghosts. This is supported by the fact that Miles asks, “Where?” in this same scene (James 86). Miles looks around but cannot see any evidence of a ghost. He only yells out Peter Quint’s name as a guess in response to the Governess’s questioning, since he knows the Governess has been seeing the ghosts. Also, grammatically, Miles is calling the Governess the devil and not Peter Quint. Miles calls the Governess the devil since he believes that she is corrupted by her insanity and that she is the real threat to him and everyone else in the story, not some imaginary ghosts. This sudden final outburst pushes Miles over the edge and allows him to express his true beliefs. Others may argue that the Governess’s obsession with the children is her just being a good and protective caretaker. While it is true that the Governess may be driven to protect the children, she is still insane as she takes her protectiveness too far. For example, she believes, “London will set [Flora] up,” as she decides to send Flora away (James 79). She separates the children due to her crazy idea that they are communicating with the ghosts. This can be seen as an unnecessary and excessive measure that the Governess takes, since there is no need for the
children to be separated. There is no evidence that the children can see the ghosts, and the children always get along and are the only two left of their nuclear family. The Governess’s insanity drives her to take unnecessary measures and separate a perfect connection. Overall, the Governess can be considered insane as she exhibits many instances o flawed perception, abnormal behavior, and unnatural social interaction. Despite opposing arguments, it is undeniable that the Governess is insane
The issue whether the governess was insane or not may never be solved. Not only because critics seem to be able to find as much evidence as possible to prove their arguments but also, the reliability of the account of the governess colors the whole story with great ambiguity. We are not certain of the state of mind of the governess when she wrote down the story and when she related the story to Douglas. However, as we closely examine the state of mind of the governess, her reliability does appear to be in question. Beidler provided two readings of The Turn of the Screw and in the second one he declared: ¡§the governess saw only what she wanted to see¡¨ (Beidler 9). She was so exhausted from her prolonged insomnia that she envisioned a story with ghosts for herself to fulfill her growth as a governess.
In the governess's insane pseudo-reality and through her chilling behavior, she managed to bring downfall to Flora and Miles, the children of Bly. With compulsively obsessive actions, irrational assumptions, and demented hallucinations, the governess perceived ghosts bearing evil intentions were attempting to corrupt and destroy the children she had taken the role of care for. In reality, the governess herself brought tragedy to the children through her own selfishness and insanity.
In conclusion, it is not the ghosts, as the governess suspected, that are corrupting the children, but the governess herself, through her continually worsening hysteria that is corrupting the children. Both Peter Quint and Miss Jessel are not real ghosts that have the peculiar habit of appearing before the governess and the governess alone but they are merely the signs of the fragmenting mental state of the governess.
with Mrs. Grose, she learns that they are ghosts and former employees of the Gentleman
The governess sees a woman on the other side of the lake and jumps to the conclusion that Flora has seen her and is choosing to act like she didn’t. The child was playing with a boat and had her back turned to the lake. Why would she think that she had to have seen her? There is no proof and does not even ask the child if she saw anything. She automatically assumes it’s Miss Jessel, the previous governess who died and that she is after Flora. She tells her story to Mrs. Grose drawing her in more deeply into believing her crazy hallucinations and Mrs. Grose asks her if she is sure its Miss Jessel and the governess replies “Then ask Flora—she’s sure!” and then immediately comes back to say “no, for God’s sake don’t! She’ll say she isn’t—she’ll lie” ((James 30). She comes to the conclusion that the child will lie about it when there is no reason to suspect that she would. Again, this is her jumping to conclusions, because there is not any proof to say that the children have seen or know anything about the ghost’s. “Thus a very odd relationship develops between the governess and the children, for the more she loves them and pities them and desires to save them, the more she begins to suspect them of treachery, until at last she is convinced that they, in league with the ghosts, are ingeniously tormenting her’ (Bontly 726). “The ghosts appear, thus, when the governess is both aware of the corruption which threatens the children and convinced of her own power to preserve them untainted” (Aswell 53). It’s the governess fabricating all this up in her mind again so she can play the part of
She believes she is actually protecting the children against an outside evil, which happens to coincide with her drive to demonstrate heroism and devotion to the master. According to Purdy, the governess conjures up ghosts because she invited them and willed them to come. Purdy feels the housekeeper plays her trump card and the governess' concern is not for the children but for all that would become of her, her bargain with the master, her relationship, and her passion for him. Purdy finds the following quotes to show her passion for the master and show that this serves as the motive of action.
One of the most critically discussed works in twentieth-century American literature, The Turn of the Screw has inspired a variety of critical interpretations since its publication in 1898. Until 1934, the book was considered a traditional ghost story. Edmund Wilson, however, soon challenged that view with his assertions that The Turn of the Screw is a psychological study of the unstable governess whose visions of ghosts are merely delusions. Wilson’s essay initiated a critical debate concerning the interpretation of the novel, which continues even today (Poupard 313). Speculation considering the truth of the events occurring in The Turn of the Screw depends greatly on the reader’s assessment of the reliability of the governess as a narrator. According to the “apparitionist” reader, the ghosts are real, the governess is reliable and of sound mind, and the children are corrupted by the ghosts. The “hallucinationist”, on the other hand, would claim the ghosts are illusions of the governess, who is an unreliable narrator, and possibly insane, and the children are not debased by the ghosts (Poupard 314). The purpose of this essay is to explore the “hallucinationist” view in order to support the assertion that the governess is an unreliable narrator. By examining the manner in which she guesses the unseen from the seen, traces the implication of things, and judges the whole piece by the pattern and so arrives at her conclusions, I will demonstrate that the governess is an unreliable narrator. From the beginning of The Turn of the Screw, the reader quickly becomes aware that the governess has an active imagination. Her very first night at Bly, for example, “[t]here had been a moment when [she] believed [she] recognized, faint and far, the cry of a child; there had been another when [she] found [herself] just consciously starting as at the passage, before [her] door, of a light footstep.” The governess herself acknowledges her active imagination in an early conversation with Mrs. Grose, when she discloses “how rather easily carried away” she is. Her need for visions and fantasies soon lead her to believe that apparitions are appearing to her. It is from this point on that she begins to guess the unseen from the seen, trace the implication of things, and judge the whole piece by the pattern. After the first appearance of Peter Quint, the governess begins to make infe...
Grose and Flora first. The governess is taken aback by Flora’s beauty, calling her “ the most beautiful child [she] had ever seen,” (James 7). Then, Miles returns home from school two days later, along with a letter stating that he had been dismissed school for being “an injury” to other students. Off the bat, James reveals the Governess’s compassion for not only the children, but their uncle as well. This could establish the governess as an unreliable narrator, setting the tone for the reader to begin distrusting her perspective. Soon after, the governess sees the ghost, later identified as Peter Quint by Mrs. Grose, for the initial time. Hallucinations are one of the most known symptoms of schizophrenia. The governess keeps the meeting to herself, locking herself in her room to think whenever she can, “There were hours, from day to day--or at least there were moments, snatched even from clear duties--when I had to shut myself up to think,” (James 18). The Governess is withdrawing from friends, like Mrs. Grose and the children, and from social events, such as her clear duties, this is another symptom of
In another conversation with Mrs. Grose, the governess rebukes a comment with “Won’t, if he has the chance, turn on me? Yes, I venture still to think it” (219). The governess is questioning the integrity of Miles, and the relationship they have together. Here is another instance of James leaving the characters to wrangle with ideas in their own heads. This can relate back to the ambiguity James uses. The governess's insecurity over her relationship with Miles elicits several subjects of contention in the book. The self doubt prominent in the Governess’s life is projected onto the reader, which reflects an eerie feeling on to content. With every close relationship being called into question, an ominous feeling is cast onto the tale that escalates how frightening scenes are. The themes of insecurity and trust can also play hand in hand. A lack of trust in Flora also exacerbated the insecurity of the Governess. The governess discusses a sighting by saying “Miss Jessel stood before us on the opposite bank exactly as she had stood the other time” (212). This is ignored by Flora, which is indicated by the Governess thinking “The revelation then of the manner in which Flora was affected startled me in truth” (212). With the children not admitting to sightings of the ghosts, the governess is just further driven into a realm of questioning and self doubt. Though James
Vision: The Governess is unable to rely on her vision because when she first see’s Peter Quint she believes that he is just her imagination. Also, her vision makes her harm the children when she is trying to protect. She sees the children as the ghosts and tries to get rid of the ghost by beating them but she is harming the children when doing so.
The governess behaves in a rational manner and therefore could not be deemed insane by the widespread definition of sanity. As a sane person, the governess acts with rationality. Though she feels that the ghosts may
In the book, The Turn of the Screw, by Henry James, there are many different views on what is actually occurring. A woman was offered a job as the governess by the owner of a large estate. He told her that all she needed to do was to watch his niece and nephew and also take care of the estate. She took the job because she was enticed by the man and was eventually introduced to the others on the estate. Soon after she became acquainted with the others on the grounds, she started noticing strange situations transpiring. There is little mentioned by the others in the book to allow for a strong interpretation of the circumstances appearing to the governess which leads me to believe that she has a mental illness and shows multiple signs of
In his 1948 essay, Robert Heilman explores the suggestion that The Turn of the Screw is a symbolic representation of the conflict between good and evil. Heilman interprets the apparitions of Peter Quint and Miss Jessel as evil forces. He explains that the ghosts only appear to the governess because evil lurks in subtlety before it strikes. It is the duty of the governess to "detect and ward off evil." She must protect the children from the awful ghosts. The governess describes Miles and Flora as beautiful little cherubs whose only fault is their gentleness (James, 18-19). Heilman views the children's beauty as a "symbol of the spiritual perfection of which man is capable." Heilman explains the ghosts' attempts to reach the children by explaining that evil forces will always try to conquer and possess the human soul. Heilman continues to draw from the descriptions of Miles and Flora to support his theories. He points out that the two children are described as having an "angelic beauty" and a "positive fragrance of purity" (James 9, 13). The governess describes them as if they are perfect and beautiful in every way. This repeated vision of beauty, radiance, and innocence parallels the image of Eden. The house at Bly also resembles this image, "I remember the lawn and the bright flowers..." (James 7). The governess makes mention of the "golden sky" and of Flora's "hair of gold," which Heilman believes connects Bly and Flora with these images of golden hues (James 7, 9).
In an attempt to make sense of the ambivalence within The Turn of the Screw it is vital to first illustrate such ambivalence within the text itself. The first example being whether or not the governess actually sees ghosts and if not are they are a mere figment of her imagination. Important to note here is the fact that the governess serves as both narrator and protagonist. This raises uncertainty as the ghosts are only visible to her throughout the text, therefore leaving us as readers with mixed feelings as to the credibility of the governess as a...
Mother asks, “Is there a ghost inside my child?” is a headline that is similar to how the novel The Turn of the Screw, by Henry James, is played out. Psychoanalytic criticism interprets the governess as being sane. This is because she is taking her job to the next level by acting like a mother toward the children. She is over-protecting Miles and Flora because she believes the ghosts of Quint and Miss Jessel are trying to get the children. The governess is also acting like this because she feels the need to over-protect the children because she never had a mother figure in her life.