The Goldfish Conflict

956 Words2 Pages

10th ELA PERIOD 3 Ms Head How to bridge conflict Successfully ___ By Johnathan Kanzler There are many ways that conflict can erupt, however there is only 1 way that can bring a satisfactory resolution. Between the many ways we can see conflict, there are two common means of resolving these issues. These conflicts include killing a child, going missing, dumping your daughter's stature into a lake, missing out on your culture, and the legality of burning the American flag. What all these conflicts have in common is that they all reach a solution, however these solutions vary heavily from each other. These solutions can be categorized into two groups within all the conflicts given. However, between these 2 groups, one of them is an obvious and …show more content…

However he is not well mannered as he just barges into the home of a Russian man named Sergei(who does not like unexpected company) because he was infatuated with his goldfish(not knowing it is a magical goldfish). However Sergei who has past experiences with the KGB(The Committee for State Security was the main security agency for the Soviet Union) he panics thinking the boy is going to steal his magical goldfish away from him so he ends up tragically striking Yoni with a burner from the stove. The strike indefinitely killed Yoni. Which causes Sergei to struggle with his decision of whether to use his last wish and lose his only friend, the goldfish, or keep his friend but deal with the murder of Yoni. He ultimately saves the young boy’s life with his final wish after much debating with the goldfish. Showing us the best solution to this problem since the solution effectively saves the boy's life undoing Sergei’s wrong doing. Even though Sergei loses his only friend, it shows the realisticness to problem solving in which sometimes a party or both parties must sacrifice what is necessary for the Bridge to be …show more content…

But these claims are wrong when they fail to bring sufficient evidence to debunk my claim. Throughout other stories like “Without Title” we see a man who just accepts his fate instead of trying to undo his situation. He never fights nor sacrifices anything to reclaim his lost heritage; in fact, he sacrifices more when he starts a relationship with his wife by getting rid of his arrows. He sacrificed to make his situation worse, not better, and his solution is to sulk and accept his fate. In contrast, had he just made efforts to fix his misery in any shape or form, he simply crumbled and allowed his lost heritage to be his future. Why would anyone want to live an unhappy life when to just fix it you just have to make an effort or sacrifice to bridge the conflict? Effort and being informed can make your decision a lot easier in your life. Had the main protagonist just made an effort to reclaim his heritage, his life would have been a lot happier and much more fulfilling. The best way to bridge a conflict and successfully solve the conflict is to come to a solution based on fact instead of emotion, even if that solution involves

Open Document