The Golden Age Of The Song Dynasty

914 Words2 Pages

AP World HW #11
Between 500 CE and 1300 CE, China established international dominance, respective to the world of third-wave civilizations. However, East Asia’s rise to authority consisted of several changes that ultimately reinvented global perception of the region. Culturally, what was considered the “golden age” of the Song dynasty was also fraught with new patriarchal restrictions on women, societal opinions becoming increasingly misogynistic. Regarding the disruption in cultural opinion was the prominence of Confucianism, which had originally died out in favor of a more liberal mindset imposed by the surrounding steppe nomads. The most critical change was the definitions of masculinity and femininity; as Confucianism advocated education as one’s most valuable asset, women were seen as temptresses, distractions to men’s scholarly pursuits. Subsequent to what is considered a Chinese “golden age” is also a blemish on the country’s past, as practices that arose during this time were blatantly cruel, at least from a modern perspective. A product of this mindset was the new tradition of foot binding, which was both a mark of elitism and subordination, each central to Confucian philosophies. This process was created out of societal objectification of women, as women with smaller feet were allegedly more attractive to men and had a higher chance of marrying into a wealthy family, but also out of economic hierarchies, since peasant women could not have their feet bound because they needed full mobility to provide for their families on the fields. Economical changes usurped the previously woman-dominated field of textile production, and the greater chance for household prosperity limited social cohesion due to jealousy and tension. Ch...

... middle of paper ...

... The reputation and seeming cohesion of the Chinese empire masked the flaws in civilization and reaffirmed the idea that Chinese processes were correct, leading to international adoption of their structures. The self-empowering nature of the tribute system reinforced the notion that barbarians were backwards, slovenly, dirty people, whereas the Chinese were advanced, admirable, and superior. Furthermore, the tribute system as a political change increased diffusion and acceptance of Chinese ideals and changed international norms. This then shapes history, why we think the Chinese were far more powerful and sophisticated than the barbarians. The changes caused by the tribute system are significant because it made China emblematic of “civilization,” creating both historical and modern understanding that Chinese life, and urban life in general, is the key to dominance.

Open Document