Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout his novel The God We Never Knew, author Marcus J. Borg defines his view of God as one of panentheistic origin. Panentheism is a belief system that affirms “both the imminence and transcendence of God” (Borg 32) by combining theism, the idea that God is a supreme being, with pantheism, the theory that God is everything. Utilizing a panentheistic method of thought allows one to understand that God is in everything and everything is in God. An expression of what Borg calls panentheism can be seen in the painting Canticle of the Sun II by John Coburn, inspired by a song composed by Francis of Assisi. Examples of panentheistic thought are found both in the painting, through its use of interconnected shapes, and in the song, through Francis …show more content…
of Assisi’s references to God as being part of multiple aspects of natural life. Both works provide viewers with the insight as to how panentheism can be utilized in order to understand complex religious ideas. In his painting Canticle of the Sun II, John Coburn makes several references to panentheism that are demonstrated through the use of color and shape.
The palette of color that Coburn utilizes in the work are earth tones that give the piece a natural, aesthetic quality. The deep greens, vivid oranges, and dark browns are all found in nature, whether it be in foliage, sunlight, or silt. Coburn painted these colors into free-flowing shapes that interact with each other in the work, as the shapes are not confined to the three boxes in the background of the painting. Instead, the shapes are in the forefront, and extend past the rectangular barriers and interact with other shapes in the work. This combination of color and shape distinctly represent panentheism as they portray the interaction of God within the world and of the world being within God. The orange circular figure, clearly representative of the sun, is providing nourishment to the green plant-like shapes beneath it, allowing for the growth of vegetation. This relationship of sun to plant is a metaphor to the relationship of God with human beings. Just as the sun helps the plants develop, God helps humans evolve and mature. The integral connection between the sun and the plant parallels the necessary relationship between God and humans, a relationship that would not be fully developed if God was not in everything and everything was not within God. The combination of color and shape within Canticle of the Sun II illuminates the subtle presence of panentheistic thought throughout the painting, allowing viewers to understand the complexity of the relationship between God and man
beings. The song written by Francis of Assisi that provided Coburn inspiration for Canticle of the Sun II also contains several references to panentheistic ideology. Francis of Assisi refers to God both as being part of the Earth and to the Earth as being part of God. For example, he states that God should be praised “through our sister Mother Earth, who feeds us and rules us…” (“Canticle”). Praising God through Mother Earth logically implies that God and Mother Earth are somehow connected. God created the Earth which nourishes the people, and therefore everything that is fed by the Earth contains a part of God. An additional instance in which the idea of panentheism is present is when Francis states that God should be praised through all forms of weather, “through which You [God] give all Your creatures sustenance” (“Canticle”). Due to the fact that God creates the weather, and the weather in turn allows crops to grow, God is indirectly present in the food that humans consume. This represents the God is in everything aspect of panentheism because the presence of God is found in things that God does not craft directly, such as our food. God transcends any earthly substance, but at the same time we are always in the presence of Him, demonstrating the fact that everything is in God as well. Evidently, the song written by Francis of Assis that inspired Coburn to paint Canticle of the Sun II contained several references to panentheism that illustrate the importance of understanding the dualistic nature of God in our lives. Both Canticle of the Sun II by John Coburn and the song written by Francis of Assisi contain references to panentheistic ideology, whether they are explicitly stated or interpretable depending on the observer. These works clearly demonstrate that through panentheism, it is effortless for people to notice the transcendence and immanence of God. The examples in these works irrefutably display the duality of God and how panentheism can be used to make sense of this complex nature of understanding religion.
Wayne, transforms this painting into a three dimensional abstract piece of art. The focal point of the painting are the figures that look like letters and numbers that are in the front of the piece of art. This is where your eyes expend more time, also sometimes forgiving the background. The way the artist is trying to present this piece is showing happiness, excitement, and dreams. Happiness because he transmits with the bright colours. After probably 15 minutes on front of the painting I can feel that the artist tries to show his happiness, but in serene calm. The excitement that he presents with the letters, numbers and figures is a signal that he feels anxious about what the future is going to bring. Also in the way that the colors in the background are present he is showing that no matter how dark our day can be always will be light to
For example, he uses texture, color and organic forms to make the landscape look as real as possible. Most of the shapes are formed by shifts in colors and line because the canvas are two-dimensional. The viewer can observe that the painting is dominated by greys, browns, ochers, and other natural colors such as green and yellow to give the scene a more nature-like look. All the components and objects painted in this piece appear to have the same texture and color as the ones found in real life, such as rocks suggesting a rough hard texture and clouds being soft, which probably means that Vernet took in consideration real landscapes and places he might have seen in real life. While using different shades of grey, and painting dark clouds, Vernet was able to convince that a storm was approaching but he also decided to add source of light coming from the upper left corner by using a golden yellow color to create a sense of warmth, which creates a nice contrast between the light and the coldness from the overall shadows that seem to dominate the artwork, creating variety; however, the repetition of colors such as greys gave the whole piece a sense of unity and they also express the shadows of a stormy day. We
Additionally, Lie placed tall trees in the foreground of the painting to give a sense of the scale between the observer’s perspective and surrounding objects. Furthermore, Lie used dark, cold colors, such as purple, blue and black, to depict the feeling of a winter’s afternoon. Lie also used snow on the ground as an obvious indicator of the time frame in which the painting is occurring. However, in contrast to the dark cold colors used, Lie also used subtle hints of orange, yellow and red to show that there is some presence of light in the piece. The background of the painting is a sheen of yellow, suggesting the presence of light and the forming sunset.
In the article,"An Atheist Manifesto," by Sam Harris he discusses how God does not exisit because if he did exist there would not be any evil in this world. As I was reading this article I found it very intresting how Harris is so negative and believes that everything that happens is God's fault. "....at this very moment that an all-powerful and all-loving God is watching over them and their family. Are they right to believe this? Is it good that they believe this?No,.." stated Harris. He should understand that God gave us a gift called "free will," and with that gift it comes with a price that we should live with the consequeces by the descisions we make as human beings. I liked this article because it showed me the other side of the coin
The content of this painting represents a Christian worldview because of all the symbolism inside the piece. The most predominant image in this painting is the light house, which is also the focal point of the piece. The viewers eyes are first drawn t the clouds in the top right corner of the painter before following the ocean waves to the shore that lead to the light house. A light house has always been a symbol of guidance as it is a beacon that guides sailors safely back to shore. Kinkade uses the light house in this painting to symbolize the love of God. The light house is shining brightly in his picture even though it’s not dark yet. In the same way God will always be a light to those to wish to follow Him. God will always lead us back to him and be a guide for our live. He will make sure that we always survive temptations. As the light house guides the ships out of the storm, God will always guide his people to the promise land.
The representation of the new age of exploration, which serves as an allusion to man’s potential, is starkly contrasted with the depiction of Icarus that serves as an allegory for man’s limits, indicating the shift from a euro-centric universe. This painting is an oil canvas landscape of the sun setting on the horizon of the ocean sea, while the ships were sailing through the body of water. The focus on humanism during this period is clearly portrayed by the presence of the plowman, shepherd, and fisherman performing their daily task. Lighter colors are used, which differ from the darker colors that were emphasized during the Dark Age or Medieval period. Shadows can be seen on the ground next to the plowman, showing the increasing artistic methods that begin to be utilized.
"EXPLORING THEOLOGY 1 & 2." EXPLORING THEOLOGY 1 2. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 May 2014.
The theme can be generally recognized in this piece through color, space, and especially through use of light. The colors used in this piece are mostly calm toned, whereas the robes and shawls worn are pale blues, corals, and beiges. There are however, some harsh colored objects such as Mary’s navy blue shaul and deep coral gown, as well as Christ’s coral necklace that stand out from the rest of the colors. Mary’s veil and the angel on the lefts’ hair are translucent in certain streams of light coming from the windows throughout the room. The artists suggests that the light is dedicated not to represent the divine but to rather represent a more natural juxtaposition on the piece. The space that the characters stand in is fully used by the subjects but also has a very interesting doorway with heightened perspecti...
From the beginning, the four characters in the aftermath of a shipwreck do not know "the colour of the sky" but all of them know "the colours of the sea." This opening strongly suggests the symbolic situations in which human beings are located in the universe. The sky personifies the mysterious, inconceivable cause of reality , which humans cannot understand, and the sea symbolizes the earthy, mundane phenomenon, which humans are supposed to perceive. The symbolic picture generated by the above conflict implies the overall relationship between the individual and nature. In fact, the daily life of human beings is at the mercy of the uncontrollable waves of the sea; while, at the same time, the essential part of reality remains unknown to feeble, helpless humans.
...nts of space mirrors the substantial and unpredictable spacing within the poem. To finalize this painting explication several important colours have been employed for their symbolic purposes. The complex of the colours dark blue, black, red, and light yellow have each a connotation which is primarily associated to light v.s darkness. Light yellow, represents hope, enlightenment, knowledge- aspects artists long for and dark blue- representing peace, calmness and stability- elements that have been abandoned by artists in their search for self fulfillment. The final element is red which ties in with the colour black where black represents failure, death and the dual nature of the red pigment in this case is the reflection of sacrifice and passion- acts that artists are forced to effectuate in their absurd search for beauty, perfection, and self fulfilment.
Because of the under development of science, Ancient Greeks used mythologies and associated to the gods anything that they could not explain or understand, which also have revealed many aspects of their culture and society, including their views toward gods. Through the survived works of ancient Greeks, one can see that the concept of exchange plays a center role in the relationship between human beings and gods; and that the ancient Greeks had absolutely and undeniably respect for their gods, who are human-like and demand to be glorified.
At first glance, many facets of science and religion seem to be in direct conflict with each other. Because of this, I have generally kept them confined to separate spheres in my life. I have always thought that science is based on reason and cold, hard facts and is, therefore, objective. New ideas have to be proven many times by different people to be accepted by the wider scientific community, data and observations are taken with extreme precision, and through journal publications and papers, scientists are held accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work. All of these factors contributed to my view of science as objective and completely truthful. Religion, on the other hand, always seems fairly subjective. Each person has their own personal relationship with God, and even though people often worship as a larger community with common core beliefs, it is fine for one person’s understanding of the Bible and God to be different from another’s. Another reason that Christianity seems so subjective is that it is centered around God, but we cannot rationally prove that He actually exists (nor is obtaining this proof of great interest to most Christians). There are also more concrete clashes, such as Genesis versus the big bang theory, evolution versus creationism, and the finality of death versus the Resurrection that led me to separate science and religion in my life. Upon closer examination, though, many of these apparent differences between science and Christianity disappeared or could at least be reconciled. After studying them more in depth, science and Christianity both seem less rigid and inflexible. It is now clear that intertwined with the data, logic, and laws of scien...
“Agnosticism is the philosophical position that it is impossible to know about the nature or existence of God.” The term was invented in 1869 by Thomas H Huxley from the Greek “agnostos”. So one can define the difference between an Atheist and an Agnostic is simply as the Atheist emphasizes that there is no God, whereas the Agnostic maintains only that he does not know. Agnosticism is not a position one can take like theism or atheism, rather it’s more like an rational process.
Contemporary atheism is a positive and new humanism trying to re-found and re-construct the entire human universe of thought and values. It shows the possible abuses of religion and points out all concepts of God are only imperfect means to see him. What they say about God couldn't possibly be. Atheists are avoiding responsibility. God is not like anything we know so stop talking about him. Everything you're saying about God is wrong and invalid. The most important problem is the problem of the attributes of God more than his existence. How can we know God? We must be believers in the irrational world where we are presuppositionalless. Contemporary atheism is a new philosophical anthropology. It commands us to guard a more authentic vision of what man is. Man is a contingent, historical, and finite being. Philosophical anthropology is the meaning of contemporary atheism. Contemporary atheists say that people live with a rational structure of consciousness. We approach everything with an idealistic nature. We only know things by their relationships to other things. We only know how x determines y and not what x is by itself. We only know by imposing categories on things, therefore we do not really know God because we cannot impose categories on him. God is unlike anything else so we cannot know him in relationship with something else. The problem of God centers on the idea of alienation and the critique of real or possible abuses in religion. God is looked upon as an illusion and essentially an alienation. If our anthropology is limiting then our theology may be abusive. We are the problem if that is the case. God does not exist in the minds of atheists. They're saying get rid of all your ideas of God because they are invalid. Alienation can be positive and negative. On the positive side, I am still becoming. I am all that I have yet to become. I am incomplete. I am the result of my past choices. On the negative side, society is going to try to stop me from becoming. We trust our minds to keep us in touch with reality. What we don't realize is that our minds may be covering up what is really there.
“Why shouldst thou think … thy [beams so] reverend and strong,” the speaker questions, comparing the sun to the beauty of his lover (Donne 11-12). In the presence of love, the sun’s illuminating power is dimmed, “all honor’s mimic, [and] all wealth alchemy”—everything that could be seen as powerful is ultimately not at all (Donne 24). To go even further, Donne has the speaker reference themselves as the Earth, as all that needs to be warmed by the sun, and “these walls thy sphere,” insinuating that they are all in the world that matters (Donne 30). The two lovers are the earth, and the sun is merely the object that warms