Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book analysis the giver
Book report on the giver
Literature as a mirror of society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book analysis the giver
The Giver was about a boy named Jonas who was elected the job of receiver. This book reminds me of another book called The City Of Amber. This book was about a strict town that was so limited on resources they had assigned how much paper each person got. Much like Jonas the main character did not like the lifestyle they were living. Both story’s consisted of strict towns where the people really did not have a say in politics. And they both solved their problem in a similar way/path. Both story’s resolution involved exploring new places. For Jonas it was exploring regions and different climates. While The City of Amber encountered climbing high to find a new village above there heads. Two different problems can often be solved the same way.
The Giver: A novel that revolves around an eleven year old. Jonas grows up in an arranged environment where everything is planned and nothing is incompatible. Given a special job Jonas and the Giver create a plan to change the way their world is organized.
The Giver is about a boy named Jonas who was chosen to be the community’s next Receiver of Memory. He lived in a community where everything was chosen for the citizens, and everything was perfect. During Jonas' training, he realized that the community was missing something and that there was more in the world. Jonas wanted everybody to know that. The Giver book was then made into a movie.
Imagine a community that you live took away your personal rights; the things that you know and even the way that you think. This is happening to a boy named Jonas not only him but also the inhabitants of Jonas’s community. In the book The Giver Jonas and his community is living with no personal rights. I believe that the inhabitants of Jonas’s community and Jonas should be given personal rights. The community should be given personal rights because they can learn from their mistakes, to have memory and to have emotions. Those are the reasons why I believe that the community should be given personal rights.
Even though both the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry and modern society are both unique in their own ways, our society is a better society to live in. Our society gives us more freedom to choose for our own benefits and
The Giver provides a chance that readers can compare the real world with the society described in this book through some words, such as release, Birthmothers, and so on. Therefore, readers could be able to see what is happening right now in the real society in which they live by reading her fiction. The author, Lowry, might build the real world in this fiction by her unique point of view.
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
The Giver is actually one of my all-time favorite books, so I’ve looked into why she left the book so inconclusive in the past. The Giver is basically about a boy named Jonas who lives in a perfect society. He lives in a household with his two parents and his little sister Lilly. When he becomes a 12, he goes through a huge ceremony and all the elders assign them their jobs. In this community, there is no lying, stealing, racism, pain, sunlight or color. Jonas was chosen to be The Receiver, and he didn’t know what to do because this job was such a big deal. Jonas then goes through training with the current Receiver, who is now The Giver. Training consists of The Giver passing down the memories from when the community was not what it is today. Memories that are passed down are things that are normal to us. Memories of sun, snow, pain, and sorrow.
The Giver presents a community that appears to be perfect on the surface. Jonas's community is free of warfare, pain, sorrow and other bitterness we suffer in our society. The world seems to be secure and undergoes little conflict. Such a community seems flawless and is the idealistic society that we longed to live in. However , through Jonas's training, the imperfections of the Utopian community are revealed. The community allows little individual freedom and choice. In allowing only one person, the Receiver, to bear the memories of the world, the community frees itself from suffering and conflict. As a result, it gives up the ability to experience true feelings, passion, individual privacy, freedom and knowledge. To maintain the community's order, strict rules are applied to the inhabitants. "Releases" ( a less offensive term for kills) are performed to the citizens who jeopardize the stability and peace of the community. The inhabitants' careers and spouses are chosen by the Elders (or government).
The Giver by Lois Lowry and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley have many similarities. They both take place in futuristic utopias where happiness is the overall goal. Jonas and Bernard, the major characters in the novels, are both restless individuals who want change. Despite the close similarities, there are many contrasts in the two novels. The childhood, family, and professions arrangements are differently portrayed in the similar novels The Giver and Brave New World.
“The Giver.” Novels for Students. Ed. Diane Telgen and Kevin S. Hile. Vol. 3. Detroit, MI: Gale Research,1998. 167-81. Print.
The book The Giver is a dystopian book because you don’t get to make any of your own decisions. You would never know the truth about release. You would never experience life how you should experience it. The world may seem perfect from someone’s view inside the community, but from the outside it is harsh and horrible. Their world could be turned into a utopia eventually, but as of right know it is a
1In the book “The Giver” the government control and suppression of its people. What can happen if we don’t remain active in our government through voting. Many other choices that we are given. The government can also, take over our lives by taking away our basic rights and freedoms. The Giver in what government can become if we do not put our voice out there.
Life is a very valuable asset, but when lived on someone else’s terms its nothing but a compromise. The seemingly perfect image of Utopia which combines happiness and honesty with purity, very often leads in forming a dystopian environment. The shrewd discrepancy of Utopia is presented in both the novel ‘The Giver’ by Lois Lowry and the film ‘The Truman Show’ directed by Peter Weir. Both stories depict a perfect community, perfect people, perfect life, perfect world, and a perfect lie. These perfect worlds may appear to shield its inhabitants from evil and on the other hand appear to give individuals no rights of their own. By comparing and contrasting the novel ‘The Giver’ and the film ‘The Truman Show’, it can be derived that both the main characters become anti-utopian to expose the seedy underbelly of their Utopian environment which constructs a delusional image of reality, seizes the pleasures in their lives and portrays a loss of freedom.
As I was reading the book the Maze Runner I was frequently reminded of the Giver. In both books the time is sometime in the future and is in a community separate from the rest of the world. Both communities have their own way of functioning separate from the rest of the world. In both stories there is one main character, in the Giver Jonas, and in the Maze Runner, Thomas, who help change the norm of the society. In both stories there were a specific group of people assigned to govern the community and the people (Elders and the Keepers). In both the Giver and the Maze Runner our interests assign different jobs and everyone does their job so the society can function properly. The Giver seems tried to be a Utopian Society while The Maze Runner is the complete opposite and is a Dystopian Society. In the Giver there are no endangerment or threatening situations while in the Glade there is danger everywhere around you. The reasons why I believe that the Giver and Maze Runner are similar are because they are both separate societies that function differently and are isolated from the rest of the world and have their own way of functioning.