Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dystopia vs utopia compare and contrast
Features of a dystopian society
Dystopia vs utopia compare and contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dystopia vs utopia compare and contrast
A cooperative world where everyone works together. Enjoyable for sure, perhaps even perfect. Yet, is it even possible in the current world? In the current world, utopias are impossible since there would be a limitation and an insufficiency of materials, the lack of freedom and individuality would lead to rebellion, and the state of humanity’s technology is not advanced or developed enough.
A limited population is a key factor in utopias, but in reality, it would only lead to the society failing to be self-sufficient. In Lois Lowry’s, The Giver, Jonas’s community exists in a cycle-like fashion where each child and each single member of society follow the same exact path in life. Likewise, there is no new jobs or occupations. Each child the
…show more content…
age of eleven knows what is out there for generations on, with no exception. (Lowry 50-53) Although this seems to work it’s way out for them, it is important to know they have little to no geographical influence. The current world is completely different, and is no doubt constantly changing. This would make living in isolation difficult, since there would be no help from outside civilizations in times of need. Without help, it would become much harder to fight natural forces such as drought when a society is by itself, which could lead to crop loss and starvation. In Lissa Price’s, Starters, Callie lives in a world where the vaccination, a necessity of life in the current state, is running out. To use it effectively, they give it to the weaker members of society. However, this turns Callie’s life atrocious as she becomes the minority when the people without the vaccination die. (Price, Epilogue) This shortage leads to many turning to stealing, theft, and an overall higher crime rate, which is certainly not utopian. In order to deal with a shortage, a society must take into consideration the majority above the minority. This is a dangerous recipe as it can lead to harm of the minority or worse, rebellion. Rebellion is one of the most destructive things, and utopias and rebellion seem to go hand in hand. A common theme in dystopian societies, a lack of freedom and individuality led to rebellion.
In The Giver, Jonas learns new ideas that lead to frustration. It is not the idea itself, but the struggle of everyone not having the knowledge he has. It was the absolute separation between him and his peers that made a sort of anger form. (Lowry 99-101) It is from this anger and frustration that rebellion surfaces. The anger that there has been error and that no one else understands it, but they should leads to the feeling of injustice. Since this type of injustice can only come when around other members of society, it is almost certain this will happen in a civilization where people interact with each other. Likewise, in Starters, Callie finds the need to seek revenge when influenced. So desperate, she even goes to the level of assassination just get back what she had. (Price 246-249) This need comes from the utter realization of injustice. As previously stated, she is the oppressed minority. Different people think in different ways, and in people like Callie, their thinking can be dangerous. For example, when a person is given a choice, where neither options are acceptable, they may decide to make their own choice. This choice is often not a preferable one, and can cause a disruption that can lead to bigger complications down the road. For this time period, there is no technology that can change …show more content…
this. With emotion comes rebellion, and humanity does not have the technology to change this.
In The Giver, Jonas decides to not to take the stirring pills, which are used to help contain emotion. These pills play a big part in the society to maintain control. However Jonas decides to stop taking these pills and starts to feel the emotions again. (Lowry 129-132) When these are these are a big part of keeping the society functioning, and technology is not advanced to have them, it poses a problem. Even then, the probability of everyone taking them is not certain. Along with the fact that distribution would be a challenge of it’s own, it does not seem likely that the would be accomplishable. In Starters, Callie’s chip, the main thing controlling her, is altered to suit other’s needs. This only makes her more dangerous and leads to Callie turning to what she thought was the enemy’s side. (Price 150-152) As seen, technology can be used to shift power and destroy systems. However, it is improbable that such technology could even exist. Even now, it is common knowledge that technology is known to malfunction, but when used in such measures as to achieve peace through control, the results can be devastating. This leaves the choice of either to not have control, or have control with unavoidable risks. Sadly, both can end in ruination of a
civilization. Although desirable, utopias are impossible since there would be a limitation and an insufficiency of materials, the lack of freedom and individuality would lead to rebellion, and the state of humanity’s technology is not advanced or developed enough for the modern world. A society trying to be a utopia will have to make many choices, many of which will lead to rebellion and error. However, it’s still compelling to strive for the impossible.
undermine the realisation of utopia. Within these texts, it can be realised that no population
Utopia means a place of perfection especially in laws, government, and social conditions. That definition does not match the society in The Giver. The punishment for breaking minor rules is too much for how little the rule is. Certain people get punished for breaking the rules which is unfair. If it was a utopia everything would be the same. They hide the past of your life. The most unbelievable thing is that they kill babies that aren't good enough for them. Shocking, right? Ponder this;, if you lived in a utopian society, do you think would it be like
Living in a perfect world is like living in an anthill. An ant does not think on it’s own, make it’s own decisions, and doesn't really have any own identity, just like the utopians. It is not worth living in a perfect world. The utopian society we are introduced to in the book, The Giver, has many different characteristics that make the perfect life unbearable. Examples of these things are The Receiver, the community, and the chief elders.
“I knew that there had been times in the past-terrible times-when people had destroyed others in haste, in fear, and had brought about their own destruction” (48). In the old days, when people in Jonas’s community valued individual needs, there were lots of terrible happenings: violence; and then the society ended up with general welfare and safety. It is difficult for us to think of a world without color, freedom, music and love, but in The Giver, the society denounces these things in order to make room for peace and safety. In The Giver, by having a society based on general welfare they gave safety to their people. No violence, no criminal activities, nor homicides.
What determines a society to be either a utopia or a dystopia? Would it be everyone following the rules? In the book The Giver, by Lois Lowry, a new “Utopian” culture blossoms from the previously failed society. The Giver’s nation starts out with the intention of creating a utopian society; however, the strict limitations turn it into a dystopia where there are receivers, like Jonas, that hold the good and bad memories from the past culture. Jonas will experience great pain and great joy through his job as the Receiver instead of the whole community sharing the burden. The Giver’s world is a dystopia because of the following three reasons: they kill people that disobey the rules, they do not get to pick their own jobs, and, above all, they beat children if they do not use precise language.
Think about a community where you can’t marry someone of your choice, you can’t choose your own job, and you can’t have your own kids. This sounds like a unbearable place to live, but there is one like this and it’s in the book The Giver by Lowis Lowry. This type of community would be considered a dystopia, even though some of the citizens think it is a utopia because they don’t need to worry about a lot of regular-to us - things in their lives. The people of the controlled community in The Giver get harsh punishments for small errors, the citizens don’t get to experience any emotions, and they kill or release innocent newchildren.
The Giver was an example of a dystopian society. In this community citizen doesn`t had any freedom. It had a lots of information about why it was dystopian, but today I will talk about few thing. First reason was the natural world was banished and distrusted. Second was information, independent thought, and freedom were restricted. The last was they had fear of the out side world.
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
For instance, the narrator says when talking about Jonas, “He had been trained since earliest childhood, since his earliest learning of language, never to lie,” (page one hundred eighty-two on the digital version). This is example of conformity is shown by how obedient the citizens in The Giver are to this rule. This blind obedience covers up the possibility to be an individual by eliminating the freedom to say whatever one would like and letting it represent themselves, whether it be negative or positive. Another thing noticed is in chapter one when the narrator mentions the telling of feelings, which is when every family member has to explain how they It is at this time when everyone is behaving the same way that there is no room for differences in behavior (individuality). It is possible for a person to show who they are without telling their feelings, but when they do this, they become like everyone else and lose their uniquity. In conclusion, the ability to express one’s self is removed when rules involving behavior are put in
Throughout history, people had made numerous futile attempts to create an Utopian society. The term "Utopia" depicts on an imaginary ideal state. Such a state is describe in The Giver. In The Giver, Jonas's community believes in the renunciation of personal properties, rights, one's unique characteristics and of binding personal relationships (such as marriage). This society is believed to be perfect, free of pain and sorrow; everything is under control and "same". This serene society greatly contradict with the one we live in. Our society is furnished with hatred and warfare, yet in return, we are given freedom and the privilege of having distinctive characters. Given the nature of human beings, our society is more idealistic to live in.
Lowry writes The Giver in the dystopian genre to convey a worst-case scenario as to how modern society functions. A dystopia is an “illusion of a perfect society” under some form of control which makes criticism about a “societal norm” (Wright). Characteristics of a dystopian include restricted freedoms, society is under constant surveillance, and the citizens live in a dehumanized state and conform to uniform expectations (Wright). In The Giver, the community functions as a dystopian because everyone in the community conforms to the same rules and expectations. One would think that a community living with set rules and expectations would be better off, but in reality, it only limits what life has to offer. Instead, the community in the novel is a dystopian disguised as a utopian, and this is proven to the audience by the protagonist, Jonas. Jonas is just a norma...
In the book, The Giver, by Lois Lowry, a 12 year boy named Jonas, lives in a world where everything is the same. There is not any diversity in Jonas’ world, just sameness. Even though there is no pain or suffering, Jonas does not like his world. Jonas does not like this world of sameness because he wants to make choices, he wants to feel happy and be able to see colors, feel emotions, etc. Author Lois Lowry is warning her readers if the world is the same, there would be sameness, no diversity, people should value themselves. Too much conformity can lead to a dull society.
The book The Giver is a Dystopia because the people in their community have no choices, release and because the people don't know or understand what life is. The world in the beginning of the book seems like a utopia because how smoothly it runs but it actually is a dystopia because no world or place ever is perfect. This place or the givers world still has many flaws.
The short story Harrison Bergeron helps support the idea that all Utopias are going to fail. In Harrison Bergeron characters like him find flaws in their “perfect” community and do something about it. In the Giver, Jonas is the character that rebels against the community because he is able to see past the lies set up by the elders and see the bad parts of it. Another reason it failed was because of the pain from the handicaps. Jonas’s community doesn’t experience any pain,except for Jonas and the Giver, Jonas makes a stand by escaping and leaving the memories of pain for the rest of the community.
Louis Lowry’s The Giver uses a dystopian society as a metaphor to show how one lives without pain and lacks knowledge of other places in order to give the reader a warring that society will never be perfect. “The Giver offers experiences that enhance readers levels of inquiry and reflection.” (Friedman & Cataldo pp102-112) At First glance the novel's setting seems to be a utopia, where all possible steps are taken to eliminate pain and anguish. Often the difference between a Utopia and a Dystopia is the author’s point of view. The difference between dystopia society and a utopian society is that a “dystopia is a world that should be perfect but ends up being horrible. Imagine dystopia as a world where the government gives everything to everyone for free. You would think it would be perfect, but imagine if that government oppressed everyone. Essentially a Dystopia is a utopia that has been corrupted.” (Levitas p1) A dystopian society is “Any society considered to be a undesirable, for any number of reasons. The term was coined as a converse to a Utopia, and is most used to refer to a fictional (often near-future) society where social trends are taken to a nightmarish extreme. Dystopias are frequently frequently written as warnings, or satires, showing current trends extrapolated to a nightmarish conclusion. A dystopia is all too closely connected to current day society.” As defined in The Giver (Telgan pp162-182). This is why I believe that Lowery is giving the reader a warring about how our world is changing. We have the power to stop it before it happens if we listen to warring signs and act accordingly. If we don’t listen to those signs our society will become a nightmarish environment, to live in. “ The Giver demonstrates how conflict can force us to examine our most important beliefs about what is right and true. Conflicts can change our worldly view of thing.” (Freidmane & Catadlo pp102-112)